State of California v. State of Washington
| Decision Date | 10 November 1958 |
| Docket Number | O,No. 12,12 |
| Citation | 358 U.S. 64,79 S.Ct. 116,3 L.Ed.2d 106 |
| Parties | STATE OF CALIFORNIA, plaintiff, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON. riginal |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Mr. Wallace Howland, Asst. Atty. Gen. of California (Messrs. Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen. and Leonard M. Sperry, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., on the brief), for plaintiff.
Messrs. John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen. of Washington and Thomas R. Carlington (Mr. Franklin K. Thorp, Asst. Atty. Gen., on the brief), for defendant.
Messrs. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen. and Paxton Blair, Sol. Gen. for State of New York, as amicus curiae.
On motion for leave to file bill of complaint.
The motion for leave to file bill of complaint is denied. U.S.Const. Amend. XXI, § 2; Indianapolis Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control Commission, 305 U.S. 391, 59 S.Ct. 254, 83 L.Ed. 243; Joseph S. Finch & Co. v. McKittrick, 305 U.S. 395, 59 S.Ct. 256, 83 L.Ed. 246; Mahoney v. Joseph Triner Corp., 304 U.S. 401, 58 S.Ct. 952, 82 L.Ed. 1424; State Board of Equalization of California v. Young's Market Co., 299 U.S. 59, 57 S.Ct. 77, 81 L.Ed. 38.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corporation
...or prevent the traffic and distribution of intoxicants within its borders has remained unquestioned. See California v. Washington, 358 U.S. 64, 79 S.Ct. 116, 3 L.Ed.2d 106. Thus, in Ziffrin, Inc. v. Reeves, 308 U.S. 132, 60 S.Ct. 163, 84 L.Ed. 128, there was involved a Kentucky statute, 'a ......
-
California v. Rue
...of Revenue v. James B. Beam Distilling Co., 377 U.S. 341, 344, 346, 84 S.Ct. 1247, 1249, 1250, 12 L.Ed.2d 362; California v. Washington, 358 U.S. 64, 79 S.Ct. 116, 3 L.Ed.2d 106; Ziffrin, Inc. v. Reeves, 308 U.S. 132, 60 S.Ct. 163, 84 L.Ed. 128; Mahoney v. Joseph Triner, Corp., 304 U.S. 401......
-
American Travelers Club, Inc. v. Hostetter
...59 S.Ct. at 255, 83 L.Ed. 243 (this case, along with Triner and Finch, was cited by the Supreme Court in California v. Washington, 1958, 358 U.S. 64, 79 S.Ct. 116, 3 L.Ed.2d 106). Cf. State Board of Equalization v. Young's Market Co., supra, 299 U.S. at 64, 57 S.Ct. at 79, 81 L.Ed. 38 (also......
-
Reynolds v. Louisiana Bd. of Alcoholic Beverage Control
...the traffic and distribution of intoxicants within its borders has remained unquestioned. See (State of) California v. (State of) Washington, 358 U.S. 64, 79 S.Ct. 116, 3 L.Ed.2d 106. Thus, in Ziffrin, Inc. v. Reeves, 308 U.S. 132, 60 S.Ct. 163, 84 L.Ed. 128, there was involved a Kentucky s......