360 F.2d 211 (2nd Cir. 1966), 274, Annenberg v. Alleghany Corp.

• Docket Nº: 274, 305, 30147, 30213.
• Citation: 360 F.2d 211
• Party Name: Jeanette ANNENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ALLEGHANY CORPORATION and the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Co., Defendants-Appellees. Sandor SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cyrus S. EATON, Walter J. Tuohy, Cyrus S. Eaton, Jr., Clinton W. Murchison, Anita O'Keeffe Young, as Executrix of the estate of Robert R. Young, Deceased, Defendants-Appellees, and
• Case Date: May 19, 1966
• Court: United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Page 211

360 F.2d 211 (2nd Cir. 1966)

Jeanette ANNENBERG, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ALLEGHANY CORPORATION and the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Co., Defendants-Appellees.

Sandor SCHWARTZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Cyrus S. EATON, Walter J. Tuohy, Cyrus S. Eaton, Jr., Clinton W. Murchison, Anita O'Keeffe Young, as Executrix of the estate of Robert R. Young, Deceased, Defendants-Appellees, and Robert Bowman, Allan B. Kirby, Alleghany Corporation and the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., et al., Defendants.

Nos. 274, 305, 30147, 30213.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 19, 1966

Argued March 30, 1966.

Norman Annenberg, New York City, for appellant Annenberg.

Rogers, Hoge & Hills, Sidney P. Howell, Jr., Marie V. Driscoll, New York City, for Alleghany Corporation.

Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City (Carl E. Newton, James M. MacNee, III, M. Lauck Walton, New York City, of counsel), for Chesapeake & Ohio Ry.

J. Milton Fainer, Sidney L. Garwin, Bertram Bronzaft, New York City, for appellant Schwartz.

Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City (Carl E. Newton, M. Lauck Walton, New York City, of counsel), for appellees Eaton, Tuohy and Eaton, Jr.

Satterlee, Warfield & Stephens (Henry J. Formon, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for appellee Murchison.

Lord, Day & Lord, New York City (Thomas F. Daly, William E. McCurdy, Jr., New York City, of counsel), for appellee Young.

Before WATERMAN, MOORE and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In No. 30213, plaintiff Schwartz appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in Schwartz v. Bowman, his stockholder's derivative action against several defendants on behalf of Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., in which case motions by each of the defendants-appellees for dismissal of the complaint and for summary judgment pursuant to Rules 12(b) and 56(b) F.R.Civ.P. were granted.

In No. 30147, plaintiff Annenberg, who had brought her stockholder's derivative action on behalf of Alleghany Corporation, appeals from the granting on the same day by the same court of a...