360 West 11TH LLC v. Acg Credit Company II, LLC, 2227N.

Decision Date18 December 2007
Docket Number2227N.
Citation2007 NY Slip Op 09939,46 A.D.3d 367,847 N.Y.S.2d 198
Parties360 WEST 11TH LLC et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. ACG CREDIT COMPANY II, LLC, Respondent-Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Since the purpose of a preliminary injunction is to maintain the status quo pending a hearing on the merits, rather than to determine the parties' ultimate rights (see Matter of 35 N.Y. City Police Officers v City of New York, 34 AD3d 392, 393-394 [2006]), the motion court exercised its discretion appropriately in granting plaintiffs' motion to the extent of directing defendant to place into escrow a certain sum of money. However, inasmuch as the denial of injunctive relief as to the entirety of the sum disputed by the parties would disturb the status quo, we modify to the extent indicated.

We have considered the arguments raised by defendant on the cross appeal and find them unavailing.

Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Lofty Apartment Corp. v. R.A.V. Barouck LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 3, 2012
    ...component of the total relief plaintiff seeks. Lehev v. Goldburt, 90 A.D.3d 410, 411 (1st Dep't 2011); 360 W. 11th LLC v. ACG Credit Co. II, LLC, 46 A.D.3d 367 (1st Dep't 2007); Sithe Energies, Inc. v. 335 Madison Ave., LLC, 45 A.D.3d 469, 470 (1st Dep't 2007). See Jones v. Park Front'Apts.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT