364 U.S. 656 (1961), 73, Radiant Burners, Inc. v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.,
|Docket Nº:||No. 73|
|Citation:||364 U.S. 656, 81 S.Ct. 365, 5 L.Ed.2d 358|
|Party Name:||Radiant Burners, Inc. v. Peoples Gas Light & Coke Co.,|
|Case Date:||January 16, 1961|
|Court:||United States Supreme Court|
Argued December 7, 1960
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
Under § 4 of the Clayton Act, a manufacturer of gas heaters brought a suit for treble damages against a trade association and ten of its members which are pipeline companies, gas distributors and manufacturers of gas burners, claiming that the defendants had combined and conspired to restrain interstate commerce in the manufacture and sale of gas burners in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act. It alleged that: the association tests burners and issues a seal of approval for those which pass its tests; such tests are not objective, but are influenced by some of the defendants which are in competition with plaintiff; the association has improperly refused to approve plaintiff's gas burners; two of the defendants which are gas distributors refuse to provide gas for use in plaintiff's burners; and plaintiff's gas burners have thus been effectively excluded from the market.
Held: it was error for the District Court to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, 359 U.S. 207. Pp. 657-660.
273 F.2d 196 reversed.
Per curiam opinion.
The question here is whether petitioner's complaint stated a claim upon which relief could be granted. Petitioner is engaged at Lombard, Illinois, in the manufacture and sale in interstate commerce of a ceramic gas burner, known as the "Radiant Burner," for the heating of houses and other buildings. Claiming that American Gas Association, Inc. (AGA), a membership corporation doing business in the Northern District of Illinois and in other States, and 10 of its numerous members1 who also are doing business in the Northern District of Illinois, combined and conspired to restrain interstate commerce in the manufacture, sale and use of gas burners in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, petitioner brought this action against those parties for treble damages and an injunction in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.2
The complaint included the following allegations: American Gas Association...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP