Dohahue v. District of Columbia, 10940.

Citation368 A.2d 1147
Decision Date25 January 1977
Docket NumberNo. 10940.,10940.
PartiesMatthew E. DONAHUE, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Appellee.
CourtD.C. Court of Appeals

Matthew E. Donahue, pro se.

John R. Risher, Jr., Corp. Counsel, Henry E. Wixon and Melvin J. Washington, Asst. Corp. Counsels, Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before NEWMAN, Chief Judge, and FICKLING and MACK, Associate Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This appeal challenges an order of the Tax Division of the Superior Court dismissing appellant's petition contesting an assessment of personal property taxes for fiscal year 1974 on the ground that the petition was not filed within six months after the date of assessment. We affirm the dismissal.

The trial judge found that a notice of assessment stating the amount of personal property taxes owed by appellant for fiscal year 1974 was mailed by the District of Columbia and received by the appellant no later than October 12, 1973, the date of appellant's first (of two) tax payment installments.1 Subsequently, on February 5, 1975 appellant filed a petition in the Tax Division appealing this assessment.

The appeal procedure for contesting the personal property tax assessment at issue is set out in D.C.Code 1973, § 47-2403, which provides in pertinent part:

Any person aggrieved by any assessment by the District of any personal-property . . . tax or taxes, or penalties thereon, may within six months after payment of the tax, together with penalties and interest assessed thereon, appeal from the assessment to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. The mailing to the taxpayer of a statement of taxes due shall be considered notice of assessment. . . .

In National Graduate University v. District of Columbia, D.C.App., 346 A.2d 740 (1975), we reviewed the legislative history of D.C.Code 1973, § 47-2403 and concluded "that the six month time requirement of [the statute] applies to appeals from assessments of allegedly exempt property and that the period begins to run from the mailing of the notice of assessment." Id. at 742 (footnote omitted). Furthermore, while the instant case does not present the issue of allegedly exempt property, we previously suggested, and now hold, "that the period for all appeals under § 47-2403 runs from the mailing of the assessment, the clause `after payment . . .' to be read as `provided payment has been made.'" Id. at 743 n. 7 (emphasis added).

Thus in light of our interpretation of D.C.Code...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Peoples Drug Stores v. District of Columbia
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • December 15, 1983
    ...it was "constrained to affirm the trial court's dismissal" in light of the interpretation given § 47-2403 in Donahue v. District of Columbia, 368 A.2d 1147 (D.C. 1977) (per curiam).2 Upon consideration by the full court, we now overrule Donahue (except to the extent necessary to address the......
  • Floyd E. Davis Mortg. Corp. v. D.C., 80-511.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • February 11, 1983
    ...-3303 (1981)] on July 2, 1975. Implementing D.C.Code § 47-2403 (1973), and relying upon our prior decisions in Donahue v. District of Columbia, 368 A.2d 1147 (D.C.App.1977), and National Graduate University v. District of Columbia, 346 A.2d 740 (D.C.App.1975), the trial court measured the s......
  • Daro Realty v. Dist. of Columbia Zoning, 88-737.
    • United States
    • D.C. Court of Appeals
    • September 7, 1990
    ... ... DARO REALTY, INC. and Dupont Circle Citizens Association, Petitioners, ... DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ZONING COMMISSION, Respondent, ... Fourways of Washington, Inc., Intervenor ... No ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT