373 F.3d 372 (3rd Cir. 2004), 03-3388, Prometheus Radio Project v. F.C.C.

Docket Nº:03-3388, 03-3577, 03-3578, 03-3579, 03-3580, 03-3581, 03-3582, 03-3651, 03-3665, 03-3675, 03-3708, 03-3894, 03-3950, 03-3951, 04-4072, 04-4073, 04-1956.
Citation:373 F.3d 372
Party Name:PROMETHEUS RADIO PROJECT v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; United States of America Prometheus Radio Project, Media General, Inc., National Association of Broadcasters, Network Affiliated Stations Alliance, ABC Television Affiliates Association, CBS Television Affiliates Association and NBC Television Affiliates, Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. a
Case Date:June 24, 2004
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 372

373 F.3d 372 (3rd Cir. 2004)

PROMETHEUS RADIO PROJECT

v.

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; United States of America Prometheus Radio Project, Media General, Inc., National Association of Broadcasters, Network Affiliated Stations Alliance, ABC Television Affiliates Association, CBS Television Affiliates Association and NBC Television Affiliates, Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. and Fox Television Stations, Inc., Viacom Inc., National Broadcasting Company, Inc., and Telemundo Communications Group, Inc., Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., Media Alliance, Paxson Communications Corporation, National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States, Tribune Company, Paxon Communications Corporation, Emmis Communications Corporation, Center for Digital Democracy and Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting, Clear Channel Communications, American Hispanic Owned Radio Association, Civil Rights Forum on Communications Policy, League of United Latin American Citizens, Minority Business Enterprise Legal Defense and Education Fund, Minority Media and Telecommunications Council, National Asian American Telecommunications Association, National Association of Latino Independent Producers, National Coalition of Hispanic Organizations, National Council of La Raza, National Hispanic Media Coalition, National Indian Telecommunications Institute, National Urban League, Native American Public Telecommunications, Inc., PRLDEF-Institute for Puerto Rican Policy, Unity: Journalists of Color, Inc. and Women's Institute for Freedom of the Press.

No. 03-3388, 03-3577, 03-3578, 03-3579, 03-3580, 03-3581, 03-3582, 03-3651, 03-3665, 03-3675, 03-3708, 03-3894, 03-3950, 03-3951, 04-4072, 04-4073, 04-1956.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

June 24, 2004

Argued Feb. 11, 2004.

Page 373

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 374

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 375

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 376

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 377

[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Page 378

Shelby D. Green, White Plains, NY, for National Council of the Churches of Christ in the United States.

Samuel L. Spear, Spear Wilderman Borish Endy Spear & Runckel, Philadelphia, PA, for Prometheus Radio Project.

Angela J. Campbell, (Argued), James A. Bachtell, Karen Henein, Institute for Public Representation, Washington, DC, for Media Alliance and Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, Inc.

Glen B. Manishin, (Argued), Stephanie A. Joyce, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Vienna, VA, for Consumers Union and Consumer Federation of America.

Robert A. Long, Jr., Kevin C. Newsom, Heidi C. Doerhoff, Covington & Burling, Washington, DC, for CBS Television Network Affiliates Association, NBC Television Affiliates and Network Affiliated Stations Alliance.

Wade H. Hargrove, Mark J. Prak, Brooks, Pierce, Mclendon, Humphry & Leonard, Raleigh, NC, for ABC Television Affiliates Association.

Henk Brands (Argued), Patrick S. Campbell, John H. Longwell, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, DC, for Fox Entertainment Group, Inc., Fox Television Stations, Inc. and Viacom Inc.

Michael K. Kellogg, Mark L. Evans, Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd & Evans, PLLC, Washington, DC, for National Broadcasting Company, Inc. and Telemundo Communications Group, Inc.

Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. (Argued), Ian Heath Gershengorn, Elaine J. Goldenberg, Jenner & Block, LLC, Washington, DC, Henry L. Baumann, Jack N. Goodman, Jerianne Timmerman, National Association of Broadcasters, Washington, DC, for National Association of Broadcasters.

John R. Feore, Jr., Michael D. Hays, Kenneth D. Salomon, M. Anne Swanson, Theodore L. Radway, Jason E. Rademacher, Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Millcreek Broadcasting, LLC, Media General, Inc., Simmons Media Group and Paxson Communications Corporation.

John E. Fiorini III,[d] Helgi C. Walker,d [*] Eve Klindera Reed,d* Andrew G. McBride,* Richard J. Bodorff,* James R. Bayes,[dd] Kathleen A. Kirby,dd Richard E. Wiley,dd (Argued), Martha E. Heller,dd Wiley Rein & Fielding LLP, Washington, DC, Kathryn R. Schmeltzer, (Argued), Barry H. Gottfried, (Argued), Tony Lin, Paul A. Cicelski, Scott R. Flick, Christopher J. Sadowski, Shaw Pittman LLP, Washington, DC, for Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. and Univision Communications Inc.

Miguel A. Estrada, (Argued), Michael J. Edney, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC, for Clear Channel Communications, Inc.

Carter G. Phillips, (Argued), R. Clark Wadlow, Richard D. Klingler, James P. Young, Anita L. Wallgren, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, Washington, DC, Crane H. Kenney, Tribune Company, Chicago, for Tribune Company.

Jerome M. Marcus, (Argued), Jonathan Auerbach, Berger and Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA, Dianne Smith, Capitol Broadcasting Company, Inc., Raleigh, NC, for Capitol Broadcasting Company, Inc.

Page 379

David Honig, Nicolaine Lazarre, (Argued), Fatima Fofana, Julie Smith, Minority Media and Telecommunications Council, Washington, DC, for American Hispanic Owned Radio Association, Civil Rights Forum on Communications Policy, League of United Latin American Citizens, Minority Business Enterprise Legal Defense and Education Fund, Minority Media and Telecommunications Council, National Asian American Telecommunications Association, National Association of Latino Independent Producers, National Coalition of Hispanic Organizations, National Council of La Raza, National Hispanic Media Coalition, National Indian Telecommunications Institute, National Urban League, Native American Public Telecommunications, Inc., PRLDEF-Institute for Puerto Rican Policy, Unity: Journalists of Color, Inc. and Women's Institute for Freedom of the Press.

Stephen D. Gavin, Katrina C. Gleber, Patton Boggs LLP, Washington, DC, for Nassau Broadcasting Holdings, Inc., and Nassau Broadcasting II, LLC.

David A. Irwin, Irwin, Campbell & Tannenwald, Washington, DC, for Family Stations, Inc., Sunbelt Communications Company, Press Communications, LLC and Diversified Communications.

James L. Winston, Rubin, Winston, Diercks, Harris & Cooke, Washington, DC, for National Association of Black Broadcasters, Inc. and Rainbow Push Coalition, Inc.

R. Hewitt Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Makan Delrahim, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Catherine G. O'Sullivan, Nancy C. Garrison, James J. Fredricks, United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Washington, DC, for United States of America.

John A. Rogovin, General Counsel (Argued), Daniel M. Armstrong, Associate General Counsel, Jacob M. Lewis, Associate General Counsel (Argued), C. Grey Pash, Jr., Nandan M. Joshi, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC, for the Federal Communications Commission.

Before SCIRICA, Chief Judge, AMBRO and FUENTES, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

NOTE--Some parts of this form are wider than one screen. To view material that exceeds the width of this screen, use the right arrow key. To return to the original screen, use the left arrow key.

Table of Contents

I. Background 382
A. The 1934 Communications Act and Early Broadcast Ownership Regulation 382
B. Deregulation Initiatives 383
C. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 384
D. Regulatory Review Since 1996 384
E. The Commission's 2003 Report and Order 386
F. The Order's Modification of Broadcast Media Ownership Rules 386
1. Local Television Ownership 386
2. Local Radio Ownership 387
3 & 4. Newspaper/Broadcast and Radio/Television Cross" Ownership 387
5. National Television Ownership 388
6. Dual Network Rule 388
G. Procedural History of the Current Appeals 388
H. Subsequent Legislation 389
II. Jurisdiction and Standard of Review 389
A. Standard of Review Under the Administrative Procedure Act 389
B. Standard of Review Considerations Under Section 202(h) 390
1. 'Determine whether any such rules are necessary in the public interest.' 391
2. 'Repeal or modify any regulations it determines to be no longer in the public interest.' 394
C. Conclusion 395
III. Mootness and the National Television Ownership Rule 395
IV. Cross" Ownership Rules 397
A. Regulatory Background and the 2002 Biennial Review 397
B. The Commission's decision not to retain a ban on newspaper/broadcast cross-ownership is justified under § 202(h) and is supported by record evidence 398
1. Newspaper/broadcast combinations can promote localism 398
2. A blanket prohibition on newspaper/broadcast combinations is not necessary to protect diversity 399
C. The Commission's decision to retain some limits on common ownership of different-type media outlets was constitutional and did not violate § 202(h) 400
1. Continuing to regulate cross-media ownership is in the public interest 400
2. Continuing to regulate cross-media ownership does not violate the Fifth Amendment 401
3. Continuing to regulate cross-media ownership does not violate the First Amendment 401
D. The Commission did not provide reasoned analysis to support the specific Cross" Media Limits that it chose 402
...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP