Brulotte v. Thys Company
Decision Date | 17 February 1964 |
Docket Number | No. 707,707 |
Citation | 376 U.S. 905,11 L.Ed.2d 605,84 S.Ct. 666 |
Parties | Walter C. BRULOTTE et al., petitioners, v. THYS COMPANY |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Edward S. Irons, for petitioners.
George W. Wilkins, for respondent.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington granted limited to Questions 1 and 2 presented by the petition which read as follows:
'1. Whether it is a misuse to include in a license agreement a provision which perpetuates the monopoly of a licensed patent by a requirement that royalties be paid for the use of the invention after the patent has expired and the invention had been dedicated to the public.
The case is placed on the summary calendar.
To continue reading
Request your trial- Lewis v. Cardwell
-
Georgia Ass'n of Retarded Citizens v. McDaniel
... ... See Franks v. Bowman Transportation Company, 424 U.S. 747, 752-55, 96 S.Ct. 1251, 1258-60, 47 L.Ed.2d 444 (1976) (employment discrimination ... ...
-
United Farm. of Fla. H. Proj., Inc. v. City of Delray Beach
... ... 1972, 461 F.2d 1171, 1172-1173 (en banc) ; United States v. Pelzer Realty Company, Inc., 5th Cir. 1973, 484 F. 2d 438, 443; Burton v. Wilmington Park Authority, 1961, 365 U.S. 715, ... ...
-
Powelton Civic Home Own. Ass'n v. DEPARTMENT OF H. & U. DEV.
... ... 414 (1943) ... In the Scenic Hudson case, the Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. had obtained a license from the Federal Power Commission ("FPC") to construct a ... ...