377 F.2d 428 (5th Cir. 1967), 23895, White v. Murtha
|Citation:||377 F.2d 428|
|Party Name:||James H. WHITE, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Las Olas Inn Corporation, Bankrupt, Appellant, v. Francis J. MURTHA and Floyd C. Webb et al., as Trustees of the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, Appellees. Francis J. MURTHA and Floyd C. Webb et al., as Trustees of the Central States, Southeast and Southwest Areas Pension Fund, A|
|Case Date:||May 15, 1967|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit|
J. Edward Worton, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
Robert C. Ward, Miami, Fla., for appellees, Ward & Ward, Miami, Fla., of counsel.
Before PHILLIPS, [*] THORNBERRY and DYER, Circuit Judges.
ORIE L. PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge:
This case arises out of a petition seeking an order directing the Trustees of a Teamsters Union Pension Fund 1 to turn over to the Trustee in Bankruptcy 2 certain funds and property which he claimed were assets of the bankrupt and which came into the possession of the P.F. Trustees, and the claim of the P.F. Trustees to setoffs against their liability to turn over such funds. The matter was before this court on a former appeal by the Trustee from a decision of the district court involving such right to setoffs. See White, Trustee v. Murtha, et al., 5 Cir., 343 F.2d 831. The facts, up to the date of the order of the district court reviewed on the former appeal, are fully stated in the opinion of the appellate court and need not be detailed here at length. 3
Vaughan Connelly was the owner of the Everglades Hotel in Miami, Florida. It was under lease to the Las Olas Inn Corporation, which was controlled by Connelly. The P.F. Trustees held a mortgage on the hotel property. Connelly defaulted in payments on the mortgage debt and the P.F. Trustees instituted a foreclosure suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. While the foreclosure suit was pending, a Chapter XI petition was filed by Connelly and the Inn Corporation. The court approved the petition and continued Connelly in possession of the hotel property. The foreclosure action proceeded to a final decree and a foreclosure sale. The P.F. Trustees were the highest bidders at the sale and the property was struck off to them. On confirmation of the sale on December 12, 1960, possession was delivered by the debtor to the P.F. Trustees. A few weeks later, the Inn Corporation was adjudicated a bankrupt in straight bankruptcy and White was elected and confirmed as its Trustee.
The Referee held he had summary jurisdiction and directed the P.F. Trustees to turn over to the Trustee $8,452.55, being the amount of the food and beverage inventory on the date the P.F. Trustees took possession; $3,622.05 cash coming into the hands of the P.F. Trustees; $1,666, the pro rata value of beverage licenses; and $47,744.91 for accounts receivable accrued before, but collected after the transfer of possession. On review, the district court sustained the determination of the Referee that the assets referred to above were part of the bankrupt estate, but decided further that
the P.F. Trustees could setoff against their liability to the Trustee any amounts which they had paid 'in discharging obligations incurred by Connelly while he was debtor in possession during the pendency of the Chapter XI proceeding.' (See opinion of this court on former appeal, 343 F.2d 832.)
In the opinion in the former case, this court further said:
'The Trustee challenges the allowance by the district court of a set-off against the Pension Fund's liability to the Bankruptcy Trustee for amounts paid by the Pension Fund in satisfaction of operating expenses incurred by Connelly as debtor in possession under the Bankruptcy. Such expenses would normally be entitled to a first-priority status as expenses of administration of the bankrupt estate. Ingels v. Boteler, 9th Cir., 1938, 100 F.2d 915, aff'd, 308 U.S. 57, 60 S.Ct. 29, 84 L.Ed. 78, rehearing denied 308 U.S. 521, 60 S.Ct. 29, 84 L.Ed. 442.
'The district court determined that the Referee had failed to allow the Pension Fund to set-off the expenditures...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP