Elfbrandt v. Russell, 553

Decision Date15 June 1964
Docket NumberNo. 553,M,553
PartiesBarbara ELFBRANDT v. Imogene R. RUSSELL et al. isc
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

W. Edward Morgan, for petitioner.

Robert W. Pickrell, Atty. Gen. of Arizona, Philip M. Haggerty, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Norman E. Green, for respondents.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arizona.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona for further consideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, 84 S.Ct. 1316.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Elfbrandt v. Russell, 656
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 18 Abril 1966
    ...remanded the cause for reconsideration in light of Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, 84 S.Ct. 1316, 12 L.Ed.2d 377. See 378 U.S. 127, 84 S.Ct. 1658, 12 L.Ed.2d 744. On reconsideration the Supreme Court of Arizona reinstated the original judgment. 97 Ariz. 140, 397 P.2d 944. The case is here......
  • Monroe v. Trustees of the California State Colleges
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 30 Diciembre 1971
    ... ... a timely challenge to his exclusion or discharge from public employment (see, e.g., Elfbrandt v. Russell (1963) 94 Ariz. 1, 381 P.2d 554, vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of ... ...
  • State v. Cota
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • 24 Noviembre 1965
    ...rights of free speech and press. Elfbrandt v. Russell, 94 Ariz. 1, 381 P.2d 554, judgment vacated on other grounds 378 U.S. 127, 84 S.Ct. 1658, 12 L.Ed.2d 744, reinstated 97 Ariz. 140, 397 P.2d From the above discussion it follows that the unconstitutionality of A.R.S. § 13-532, the obscene......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT