379 U.S. 19 (1964), 412, Tancil v. Woolls

Docket Nº:No. 412.
Citation:379 U.S. 19, 85 S.Ct. 157, 13 L.Ed.2d 91
Party Name:Gladys Quander TANCIL et al. v. William P. WOOLLS et al., Judges. No. 386. VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al. v. E. Leslie HAMM et al.
Case Date:October 26, 1964
Court:United States Supreme Court
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 19

379 U.S. 19 (1964)

85 S.Ct. 157, 13 L.Ed.2d 91

Gladys Quander TANCIL et al.

v.

William P. WOOLLS et al., Judges.

No. 386.

VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al.

v.

E. Leslie HAMM et al.

No. 412.

United States Supreme Court.

October 26, 1964

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.

Facts and opinion, Hamm v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections, D.C., 230 F.Supp. 156.

COUNSEL

Robert Y. Button, Atty. Gen. of Virginia, R. D. McIlwaine III, Asst. Atty. Gen., William J. Hassan and Ralph G. Louk, for Hamm and others.

Allison W. Brown, Jr., for appellants Tancil and others and appellees Virginia Bd. of Elections and others.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Mr. Justice BRENNAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP