379 U.S. 19 (1964), 412, Tancil v. Woolls
|Docket Nº:||No. 412.|
|Citation:||379 U.S. 19, 85 S.Ct. 157, 13 L.Ed.2d 91|
|Party Name:||Gladys Quander TANCIL et al. v. William P. WOOLLS et al., Judges. No. 386. VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al. v. E. Leslie HAMM et al.|
|Case Date:||October 26, 1964|
|Court:||United States Supreme Court|
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Facts and opinion, Hamm v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections, D.C., 230 F.Supp. 156.
Robert Y. Button, Atty. Gen. of Virginia, R. D. McIlwaine III, Asst. Atty. Gen., William J. Hassan and Ralph G. Louk, for Hamm and others.
Allison W. Brown, Jr., for appellants Tancil and others and appellees Virginia Bd. of Elections and others.
The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Mr. Justice BRENNAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP