Tancil v. Woolls Virginia State Board of Elections v. Hamm

Decision Date26 October 1964
Docket NumberNo. 412,No. 386,386,412
PartiesGladys Quander TANCIL et al. v. William P. WOOLLS et al., Judges. VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al. v. E. Leslie HAMM et al
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Robert Y. Button, Atty. Gen. of Virginia, R. D. McIlwaine III, Asst. Atty. Gen., William J. Hassan and Ralph G. Louk, for Hamm and others.

Allison W. Brown, Jr., for appellants Tancil and others and appellees Virginia Bd. of Elections and others.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm in No. 412 is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Justice HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Mr. Justice BRENNAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted in No. 386.

To continue reading

Request your trial
35 cases
  • Holloway v. City of Va. Beach
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • 31 Marzo 2021
    ...of race.); Hamm v. Virginia State Board , 230 F.Supp. 156 (E.D. Va. 1964) (three-judge court), aff'd sub nom. Tancil v. Woolls , 379 U.S. 19, 85 S.Ct. 157, 13 L.Ed.2d 91 (1964) (holding that Virginia laws unconstitutionally required the separation of names by race on voter registration, pol......
  • Jackson v. Godwin
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 23 Julio 1968
    ...Thus it is that racial classifications have been held invalid in a variety of contexts. See, e. g., Tancil v. Woolls Virginia Board of Elections v. Hamm, 319 U.S. 19, 85 S.Ct. 157 (designation of race in voting and property records); Anderson v. Martin, 375 U.S. 399 84 S.Ct. 454, 11 L.Ed.2d......
  • Smith v. Board of Education of Morrilton Sch. Dist. No. 32
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 14 Septiembre 1966
    ...While the Supreme Court has recognized that race in certain contexts may have proper and valid significance, Tancil v. Woolls, 379 U.S. 19, 85 S.Ct. 157, 13 L.Ed.2d 91 (1964), affirming per curiam Hamm v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections, 230 F.Supp. 156, 158 (E.D.Va.1964); McLaughlin v. Sta......
  • Palmer v. Thompson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • 25 Noviembre 1969
    ...to make it invalid." In Hamm v. Virginia State Board of Elections, E.D.Va.1964, 230 F.Supp. 156, aff'd Tancil v. Woolls, 379 U.S. 19, 85 S.Ct. 157, 13 L.Ed.2d 91 (1964), the Virginia law under attack required that lists of voters and property tax assessments be kept separately for each race......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Reconnecting doctrine and purpose: a comprehensive approach to strict scrutiny after Adarand and Shaw.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 149 No. 1, November 2000
    • 1 Noviembre 2000
    ...utilize the example in which there are only two racial groups in the relevant jurisdiction, "black" and "white." (122) Tancil v. Woolls, 379 U.S. 19 (1964) (per curiam), aff'g Hamm v. Virginia State Bd. of Elections, 230 F. Supp. 156 (E.D. Va. (123) Hamm, 230 F. Supp. at 158. (124) Id. (125......
  • Principles, practices, and social movements.
    • United States
    • University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 154 No. 4, April 2006
    • 1 Abril 2006
    ...the power of the State behind a racial classification that induces racial prejudice at the polls"). (34) For example, in Tancil v. Woolls, 379 U.S. 19 (1964), the Supreme Court affirmed per curiam the lower court decision from Hamm v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 230 F. Supp. 156, 158......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT