City of Auburn v. Union Waterpower Co.
Decision Date | 29 October 1897 |
Citation | 90 Me. 576,38 A. 561 |
Parties | CITY OF AUBURN v. UNION WATERPOWER CO. |
Court | Maine Supreme Court |
(Official.)
Report from supreme judicial court, Androscoggin county.
Proceeding by the city of Auburn against the Union Water-Power Company for the taking of water for public purposes, under the provisions of Priv. & Sp. Laws 1891, c. 82. On petition of the company, damages were assessed by the county commissioners at the sum of $24,500, and the city appealed. Submitted on report. Petition dismissed.
The fourth section of the act authorized the taking, and provides that, in any case in which damages are to be allowed, if the city and the landowner were unable to agree upon the damages to be paid for such taking, application should be made to the commissioners of the county of Androscoggin, "who shall cause such damages to be assessed in the same manner and under the same conditions, restrictions, limitations and rights of appeal as are by law prescribed in the case of damages for the laying out of highways so far as such law is consistent with the provisions of this act."
The case was submitted to the law court on report, the parties stipulating that, if the Union Water-Power Company was not entitled to damages, judgment should be rendered in favor of the city as the appellant, but that, if it should be determined by the law court that the Union Water-Power Company was entitled to damages, then the amount of such damages should be determined at nisi prius.
The petition of the Union Water-Power Company, praying for an assessment of damages, represented that "it is the owner of certain water rights, water sources, and easements in the waters of 'Wilson Pond,' so called, situated in Auburn, in said county, and of certain lands and rights of flowage around said pond and' the outlet stream thereof, and also of certain lands, dams, water power, water rights, and privileges upon said outlet stream, and of the right to hold, accumulate, and store the waters of said pond by means of said dams, and to draw off the same by means of gates and sluices in said dams.
"And said company alleges that the city of Auburn, acting under and by virtue of the power and authority conferred upon it by chapter 82 of the Private and Special Laws of Maine, approved February 19, 1891, have taken the waters of said pond for the uses and purposes specified in said act, by means of pipes leading from said pond to various parts of the city, of the dimensions and locations particularly specified in the notice of such taking filed by said city in the registry of deeds for this county," etc.
An appeal from the award of damages, made by the county commissioners, having been taken by the city of Auburn, a complaint on appeal by the city was duly filed in this court below on the third Tuesday of January, 1896.
The material portions of the appeal are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Opinions of the Justices
...Brastow v. Mockport Ice Co., 77 Me. 100; Fernald v. Knox Woolen Co., 82 Me. 56, 19 Atl. 93, 7 L. R. A. 459; Auburn v. Water Power Co., 90 Me. 584, 38 Atl. 561, 38 L. R. A. 188; Conaut v. Jordan, 107 Me. 227, 77 Atl. 938, 31 L. R. A. (N. S.) 434. The right of the individual to fish and fowl ......
-
Stanton v. Trustees of St. Joseph's College
...use, without the payment of just compensation. The court, adopting in part language from City of Auburn v. Union Water Power Co., 90 Me. 576, 587, 38 A. 561, 566, 38 L.R.A. 188 (1897), discussed the problem in this "The waters of great ponds and lakes are not private property. They are owne......
-
Laughlin v. City of Portland
...compensation for those plants was raised by taxation or by loan, and again the purpose is obviously public. Auburn v. Union Water Power Co., 90 Me. 576, 38 Atl. 561, 38 L. R. A. 188; Mayo v. Dover & Foxcroft Village Fire Co., 96 Me. 539, 53 Atl. 62; Kennebec Water District v. Waterville, 97......
-
Kennebunk, Kennebunkport and Wells Water Dist. v. Maine Turnpike Authority
...law as set forth in Hamor v. Bar Harbor Water Co., 78 Me. 127, 3 A. 40, and not by the law as set forth in City of Auburn v. Water Power Co., 90 Me. 576, 38 A. 561, 565, 38 L.R.A. 188. The former decision lays down the principles of law which determine the extent of the rights conferred upo......