Stuyvesant Insurance Company v. Kelly
| Citation | 382 F.2d 991 |
| Decision Date | 03 October 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 29,Docket 30683.,29 |
| Parties | The STUYVESANT INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Audrey R. KELLY, Commissioner of Insurance of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Defendant-Appellant, and Dean Construction Company, Inc., and The New Atlantic Beach Hotel and Cabana Club, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, and Helen T. Johnson, as Administratrix of the Estate of Alma W. Taylor, deceased, Hilda Berg, Sidney Berg, Frank L. Newburger, Jr., and Dorothy E. Newburger, Defendants. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit) |
David A. Ticktin, New York City (Ticktin & Bleich, New York City, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.
Richard Rodwin, New York City (Rodwin, Rodwin & Gelin, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellant.
Leo Fixler, New York City, for defendants-appellees.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, WATERMAN and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges.
Audrey R. Kelly, Commissioner of Insurance of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, appeals from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York granting summary judgment in favor of Dean Construction Company, Inc. and The New Atlantic Beach Hotel and Cabana Club, Inc., Stuyvesant v. Dean Construction Co., 254 F.Supp. 102 (S.D.N.Y.1966).
Although we note that there was a minor error in the district court opinion in stating that the Commissioner of Insurance had filed notice of appeal to the New York Court of Appeals from the decision of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court reported as Dean Construction Co. v. Agricultural Ins. Co., 22 A.D.2d 82, 254 N.Y.S.2d 196 (1964), this was in no way germane to the determination of the issues. We affirm for the reasons stated in Judge Bryan's decision.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pearlstein v. Scudder & German
...this suit. Cf., e. g., Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Dean Constr. Co., 254 F.Supp. 102 (S.D.N.Y. 1966), aff'd mem. sub nom. Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Kelly, 382 F.2d 991 (2 Cir. 1967). Pearlstein did attempt to raise his federal issue in the state court by means of a motion to reopen the judgment aft......
-
U.S. Fidelity and Guar. v. Braspetro Oil Services, Docket No. 02-9185.
...Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., 173 F.2d at 309; Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Dean Constr. Co., 254 F.Supp. 102 (S.D.N.Y.1966), aff'd, 382 F.2d 991 (2d Cir.1967) (per curiam). Instead, the Sureties filed an action seeking a declaratory judgment that they were not liable under the Bonds, and waited for t......
-
Rubinbaum Llp v. Related Corporate Partners
...WL 6779, at *3; Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Dean Constr. Co., Inc., 254 F.Supp. 102, 108 (S.D.N.Y.1966), aff'd sub nom., Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Kelly, 382 F.2d 991 (2d Cir.1967). The Brannons are "claimants" for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1335 and 28 U.S.C. § 2361 because they are potential cla......
-
Hausler v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 09–cv–10289 (VM).
...liability" (Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Dean Const. Co., 254 F.Supp. 102, 108 (S.D.N.Y.1966), aff'd sub nom. Stuyvesant Ins. Co. v. Kelly, 382 F.2d 991 (2d Cir.1967) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)), given the Fundacion Trustees' multiple affirmative admissions, in this proceedi......