387 U.S. 427 (1967), 1186, Schackman v. Arnebergh
| Citation | 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 |
| Party Name | Harry SCHACKMAN et al. v. Roger ARNEBERGH. |
| Case Date | May 29, 1967 |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Page 427
COUNSEL
[87 S.Ct. 1622] Burton Marks, for appellants.
Roger Arnebergh, pro se, Bourke Jones and Robert B. Burns, for appellees Arnebergh and others.
Harold W. Kennedy, George Wakefield and Martin E. Weekes, for appellees Younger and others.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen. of California, pro se, and A. Barry Cappello, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee Lynch.
OPINION
PER CURIAM.
Appellants seek review by this Court of the refusal by the District Court to convene a three-judge District Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ss 2281--2284. We have held that such review is available in the Court of Appeals, Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, 82 S.Ct. 1294, 8 L.Ed.2d 794, and not in this Court. Buchanan v. Rhodes, 385 U.S. 3, 87 S.Ct. 33, 17 L.Ed.2d 3.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Motion granted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Holiday Magic v. Warren
...three-judge court. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U.S. 713, 82 S.Ct. 1294, 8 L.Ed.2d 794 (1962); Schackman v. Arnebergh, 387 U.S. 427, 87 S.Ct. 1622, 18 L.Ed.2d 865 (1967); Money v. Swank, 432 F.2d 1140 (7th Cir. 1970); Hargrave v. McKinney, 413 F.2d 320 (5th Cir. 1969); s......