Stanley v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Decision Date07 November 1994
Docket NumberNo. 93-3987,93-3987
Parties, Unempl.Ins.Rep. (CCH) P 14188B William STANLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Dianne R. Newman (argued and briefed), Sternberg, Newman & Associates, Akron, OH, for plaintiff-appellant.

Marlon A. Primes (argued and briefed), Office of the U.S. Atty., Cleveland, OH, for defendant-appellee.

Before: SUHRHEINRICH, SILER, and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges.

SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff William Stanley ("claimant") appeals from the district court order affirming the determination of the Secretary of Health and Human Services ("Secretary") that he was not disabled and therefore not entitled to disability insurance benefits. For the reasons that follow, we AFFIRM.

I.

William Stanley was born on May 24, 1940. He has a high school degree and has worked as an anodizer at Goodyear Aerospace for most of his adult life. Claimant also has a history of treatment for kidney stones. He underwent a jejunoileostomy in 1976, and developed kidney stones thereafter. He received disability benefits from 1982 through 1987 until he returned to work. Claimant filed the present application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act on November 9, 1988, citing arthritis and recurrent passing of kidney stones. On June 18, 1990, he appeared pro se before an administrative law judge ("ALJ"). The ALJ denied claimant's request on August 20, 1990, finding that he was not disabled because he was able to perform a significant number of skilled sedentary jobs in the economy. Claimant, this time through counsel, sought review by the Appeals Council. The Appeals Council vacated the ALJ's decision and remanded the case, directing the ALJ to obtain additional medical evidence regarding claimant's depression, and if necessary, to seek additional vocational expert testimony.

A second hearing was held on August 14, 1991. On October 25, 1991, the ALJ issued a decision denying benefits. The ALJ found that claimant was insured for disability benefits through at least December 31, 1992, and that he had engaged in substantial gainful activity during the period from May 24, 1989 to December 23, 1989, since his onset date of March 25, 1988. The ALJ also found that claimant's impairments, which consisted of multiple kidney stones, multiple joint arthritis, and a history of depression, did not meet or equal a condition in the listings; and that his subjective complaints of disabling pain were not supported by objective medical evidence, did not meet the factors set forth in Social Security Ruling ("SSR") 88-13 and were not credible. Finally, the ALJ determined that Stanley had the residual functional capacity to perform sedentary work activities that were of a relatively low stress nature, and although he could not perform his past relevant work as an anodizer, he had the capacity to perform skilled jobs such as a production clerk, floor inspector, and assembler.

The Appeals Council denied claimant's request for review, and the ALJ's decision became the final decision of the Secretary. Claimant filed a complaint in federal court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 405(g). Per stipulation of the parties, the magistrate judge made a final determination upholding the Secretary's decision.

II.

This court's review of the Secretary's denial of Stanley's claim is strictly limited by 42 U.S.C. Sec. 405(g). Where the record as a whole contains substantial evidence to support the Secretary's determinations, the Secretary's decision must be affirmed. Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427, 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). "Substantial evidence" is defined as "such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion." Id.

Claimant challenges the ALJ's findings that claimant's testimony about disabling pain, other symptoms and functional limitations were not supported by the objective medical evidence and were not credible. In evaluating subjective complaints of disabling pain, this court looks to see whether there is objective medical evidence of an underlying medical condition, and if so, then

1) whether objective medical evidence confirms the severity of the alleged pain arising from the condition; or,

2) whether the objectively established medical condition is of such a severity that it can reasonably be expected to produce the alleged disabling pain.

Jones v. Secretary, Health & Human Servs., 945 F.2d 1365, 1369 (6th Cir.1991) (quoting Duncan v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 801 F.2d 847, 853 (6th Cir. 1986)). In addition, SSR 88-13 acknowledges that when dealing with the inexact measure of an individual's pain There are situations in which an individual's alleged or reported symptoms, such as pain, suggest the possibility of a greater restriction of the individual's ability to function than can be demonstrated by objective medical evidence alone.

In such cases, reasonable conclusions as to any limitations on the individual's ability to do basic work activities can be derived from the consideration of other...

To continue reading

Request your trial
466 cases
  • Doyle v. Carolyn W. Colvin Comm'r of Soc. Sec.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Michigan)
    • July 28, 2014
    ...verifies the severity of the pain. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529; SSR 96-7p, 1996 WL 374186, at *2; Stanley v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 39 F.3d 115, 117 (6th Cir. 1994); Felisky, 35 F.3d at 1038-39; Duncan v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 801 F.2d 847, 853 (6th Cir. 1986). The ALJ ascer......
  • Erb v. Colvin, CASE NO. 4:13-cv-14798
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Michigan)
    • January 29, 2015
    ...the severity of the pain. See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1529, 416.929; SSR 96-7p, 1996 WL 374186, at *2; Stanley v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 39 F.3d 115, 117 (6th Cir. 1994); Felisky, 35 F.3d at 1038-39; Duncan v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 801 F.2d 847, 853 (6th Cir. 1986). The ALJ asce......
  • Johnson v. Carolyn W. Colvin Comm'r of Soc. Sec., CASE NO. 2:13-cv-14797
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Michigan)
    • January 30, 2015
    ...verifies the severity of the pain. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529; SSR 96-7p, 1996 WL 374186, at *2; Stanley v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 39 F.3d 115, 117 (6th Cir. 1994); Felisky, 35 F.3d at 1038-39; Duncan v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 801 F.2d 847, 853 (6th Cir. 1986). The ALJ ascer......
  • Eiland v. Astrue, CASE NO. 1:11-CV-1519
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Ohio
    • May 25, 2012
    ...warranted, and the ALJ was not bound by testimony showing such conditions were disabling. See Stanley v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 39 F.3d 115, 118 (6th Cir. 1994).Page 34 Here the ALJ reasonably determined that there were jobs in the economy that Plaintiff was capable of doing by pos......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Issue Topics
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Social Security Disability Collection - James' Best Materials. Volume 2
    • May 5, 2015
    ...such a severity that it can reasonably be expected to produce the alleged disabling pain. Stanley v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs ., 39 F.3d 115, 117 (6th Cir. 1994). Seventh Circuit The Seventh Circuit recently noted that: [a]pplicants for social security benefits who claim to be disa......
  • Issue topics
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Social Security Issues Annotated. Vol. II - 2014 Contents
    • August 3, 2014
    ...such a severity that it can reasonably be expected to produce the alleged disabling pain. Stanley v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs ., 39 F.3d 115, 117 (6th Cir. 1994). Seventh Circuit The Seventh Circuit recently noted that: [a]pplicants for social security benefits who claim to be disa......
  • Issue topics
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Bohr's Social Security Issues Annotated - Volume II
    • May 4, 2015
    ...such a severity that it can reasonably be expected to produce the alleged disabling pain. Stanley v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs ., 39 F.3d 115, 117 (6th Cir. 1994). Seventh Circuit The Seventh Circuit recently noted that: [a]pplicants for social security benefits who claim to be disa......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Bohr's Social Security Issues Annotated - Volume II
    • May 4, 2015
    ...1312.5 Stanistreet v. Chater , 21 F. Supp.2d 1129, 1136 n. 17 (C.D. Cal. 1995), § 1207.1 Stanley v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs. , 39 F.3d 115, 117 (6th Cir. 1994), § 1205 Starks v. Bowen , 873 F.2d 187, 190 (8th Cir. 1989), §§ 107.5, 107.16, 1107.5 Stark v. Weingerger , 497 F.2d 1092......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT