Eichelberger v. Barnhart, 04-1074.

Citation390 F.3d 584
Decision Date08 December 2004
Docket NumberNo. 04-1074.,04-1074.
PartiesBertha EICHELBERGER, Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Appellee.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
390 F.3d 584
Bertha EICHELBERGER, Appellant,
v.
Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Appellee.
No. 04-1074.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted: September 17, 2004.
Filed: December 8, 2004.

Page 585

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Page 586

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

Page 587

James H. Green, argued, Kansas City, MO, for appellant.

Aaron M. Morgan, Office of General Counsel, Social Security Admin., argued, Kansas City, MO (Jennifer L. Mills, Special Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, on the brief), for appellee.

Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BEAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

SMITH, Circuit Judge.


Bertha Eichelberger appeals a district court1 order affirming an administrative decision denying her social security disability benefits. We find no error and affirm.

I. Background

Eichelberger ceased working on March 20, 2000, complaining of shortness of breath, pain in her shoulder and lower back, a rotator cuff tear, high blood pressure, numbness in her hands and feet, and problems with balance. At that time, Eichelberger was 53 years old, had a high school diploma, and one year of college education. Her relevant work history included employment as a bench assembler, forklift operator, warehouse worker, packer, and production assembler. Eichelberger became primary care giver for her

Page 588

grandchild just prior to leaving her last employment.

Eichelberger sought medical attention and her primary care physician referred her to an orthopedic surgeon, Dr. Scott R. Luallin, for her neck, shoulder, and back complaints. Dr. Luallin attributed her right shoulder pain to a tear of the rotator cuff coupled with a chronic attritional type tear and recommended surgery. To alleviate the pain in her lower back and neck, Dr. Luallin suggested physical therapy. Eichelberger made appointments for physical therapy in early July. On July 6 and 10, however, Eichelberger cancelled her scheduled appointments stating that her grandchild was ill.

On September 1, 2000, Dr. Luallin surgically repaired Eichelberger's right shoulder. About a week later, Dr. Luallin rated Eichelberger's rehabilitation potential as good. He proposed a physical therapy regimen for Eichelberger that consisted of two treatment sessions a week for eight weeks-a total of sixteen treatments. Eichelberger did not complete the prescribed course of physical therapy. She attended one full session and a portion of another before leaving for non-health related reasons. By the end of September, Eichelberger had regained some functionality in her shoulder permitting her to again braid her granddaughter's hair and resume driving. However, Eichelberger told the therapist that she could still not do her household chores.

On September 15, 2000, Eichelberger filed an application for Social Security disability benefits. The Commissioner of Social Security denied her application and she requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ").

In January 2001, Dr. Luallin noted that Eichelberger's physical therapy progress was slow but steady. His examination revealed reasonably good strength to external rotation and Jobe's testing.2 Dr. Luallin suggested that Eichelberger continue with physical therapy. On February 5, 2001, Dr. Luallin observed that Eichelberger had only attended two of her prescribed physical therapy appointments and recommended that she continue with physical therapy. During her March examination, Dr. Luallin remarked that while Eichelberger did not appear to be putting forth her full effort, her range of motion was increasing and she had good shoulder strength and Jobe's testing. On June 26, Dr. Luallin commented that Eichelberger appeared to have pain associated with weather changes, but stated that he was pleased with her progress and encouraged her to independently do the prescribed exercises.

On September 27, 2001, Eichelberger again complained of shoulder pain with weather changes, and Dr. Luallin noted a mild positive impingement. At that time, Eichelberger's shoulder strength remained good and her Jobe's and external rotation testing remained positive. Dr. Luallin indicated that Eichelberger was stable and recommended that she continue to do her prescribed exercises and return when necessary.

On April 4, 2002, an ALJ conducted a hearing on Eichelberger's claim for social security disability benefits. After the hearing, Eichelberger returned to Dr. Luallin and complained of pain in her neck and back. Dr. Luallin observed that Eichelberger had complained of neck and back pain for many years and that she had facet arthritis in her lower back that had been treated with physical therapy. Dr. Luallin performed an examination and once again prescribed physical therapy.

Page 589

Thereafter, an MRI of Eichelberger's neck revealed multilevel degenerative disc changes with the most prominent abnormality at C4-5 and C5-6. Eichelberger also complained of pain in her knee and an x-ray revealed mild lateral joint-space narrowing. Dr. Luallin prescribed medicine and recommended icing for Eichelberger's knee. In addition, he recommended continued physical therapy for her back.

On June 27, 2002, the ALJ affirmed the Commissioner of Social Security's decision to deny Eichelberger disability benefits. Eichelberger filed for review with the Appeals Council of the Social Security Administration.3 The Council denied review on September 27, 2002, and Eichelberger appealed the ALJ's decision to federal district court. The district court agreed with the ALJ, and entered summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security.

II. Discussion

We uphold the Commissioner's determinations unless they are not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. Harvey v. Barnhart, 368 F.3d 1013, 1015 (8th Cir.2004). By statute, "[t]he findings of the Commissioner of Social Security as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive." 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Substantial evidence is "less than a preponderance but is enough that a reasonable mind would find it adequate to support" the conclusion. Krogmeier v. Barnhart, 294 F.3d 1019, 1022 (8th Cir.2002); see also Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427, 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). In assessing the substantiality of the evidence, we must consider evidence that detracts from the Commissioner's decision as well as evidence that supports it. Black v. Apfel, 143 F.3d 383, 385 (8th Cir.1998). Under this standard, we do not reverse the Commissioner even if, sitting as finder of fact, we would have reached a contrary result; "[a]n administrative decision is not subject to reversal merely because substantial evidence would have supported an opposite decision." Baker v. Heckler, 730 F.2d 1147, 1150-51 (8th Cir.1984). "If, after review, we find it possible to draw two inconsistent positions from the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2425 cases
  • Englerth v. Colvin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • 29 Septiembre 2016
    ...and the claimant is determined to be not disabled.'" Goff v. Barnhart, 421 F.3d 785, 790 (8th Cir. 2005) (quoting Eichelberger v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 584, 590-91 (8th Cir. 2004)). In this sequential analysis, the claimant first cannot be engaged in "substantial gainful activity" to qualify f......
  • Johnston v. Colvin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • 30 Septiembre 2016
    ...and the claimant is determined to be not disabled.'" Goff v. Barnhart, 421 F.3d 785, 790 (8th Cir. 2005) (quoting Eichelberger v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 584, 590-91 (8th Cir. 2004)). In this sequential analysis, the claimant first cannot be engaged in "substantial gainful activity" to qualify f......
  • Frieden v. Colvin
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • 11 Septiembre 2015
    ...and the claimant is determined to be not disabled.'" Goff v. Barnhart, 421 F.3d 785, 790 (8th Cir. 2005) (quoting Eichelberger v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 584, 590-91 (8th Cir. 2004)). In this sequential analysis, the claimant first cannot be engaged in "substantial gainful activity" to qualify f......
  • Stephens v. Astrue
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • 14 Mayo 2012
    ...and the claimant is determined to be not disabled.'" Goff v. Barnhart, 421 F.3d 785, 790 (8th Cir. 2005) (quoting Eichelberger v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 584, 590-91 (8th Cir. 2004)). In this sequential analysis, the claimant first cannot be engaged in "substantial gainful activity" to qualify f......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Case Index
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Bohr's Social Security Issues Annotated - Volume I
    • 4 Mayo 2015
    ...502 F.3d 532 (6th Cir. Sept. 24, 2007), 6th-07 Dukes v. Barnhart , 436 F.3d 923 (8th Cir. Feb. 7, 2006), 8th-06 Eichelberger v. Barnhart , 390 F.3d 584 (8th Cir. Dec. 8, 2004), 8th-04 Hill v. Colvin , 753 F.3d 798 (8th Cir. June 2, 2014), 8 th -14 Masterson v. Barnhart , 363 F.3d 731 (8th C......
  • Case index
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Social Security Issues Annotated. Vol. I - 2014 Preliminary Sections
    • 2 Agosto 2014
    ...532 (6 th Cir. Sept. 24, 2007), 6 th -07 Dukes v. Barnhart , 436 F.3d 923 (8 th Cir. Feb. 7, 2006), 8 th -06 Eichelberger v. Barnhart , 390 F.3d 584 (8 th Cir. Dec. 8, 2004), 8 th -04 Masterson v. Barnhart , 363 F.3d 731 (8 th Cir. Apr. 9, 2004), 8 th -04 Moore v. Barnhart , 405 F.3d 1208 (......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Bohr's Social Security Issues Annotated - Volume II
    • 4 Mayo 2015
    ...v. Secretary of Health and Human Services , 969 F.2d 534, 540 (7th Cir. 1992), §§ 210.3, 210.4, 601.2, 1210.5 Eichelberger v. Barnhart , 390 F.3d 584 (8th Cir. Dec. 8, 2004), 8th-04 Eichstadt v. Astrue, 534 F.3d 663 (7th Cir. July 17, 2008), 7th-08 Eiting v. Apfel , 44 F. Supp.2d 1008 (E.D.......
  • Table of cases
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Archive Social Security Issues Annotated. Vol. II - 2014 Contents
    • 3 Agosto 2014
    ...v. Secretary of Health and Human Services , 969 F.2d 534, 540 (7th Cir. 1992), §§ 210.3, 210.4, 601.2, 1210.5 Eichelberger v. Barnhart , 390 F.3d 584 (8th Cir. Dec. 8, 2004), 8th-04 Eichstadt v. Astrue, 534 F.3d 663 (7th Cir. July 17, 2008), 7th-08 A-21 TABLE OF CASES Eiting v. Apfel , 44 F......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT