390 U.S. 412 (1968), 1113, Mcsurely v. Ratliff
|Docket Nº:||No. 1113.|
|Citation:||390 U.S. 412, 88 S.Ct. 1112, 19 L.Ed.2d 1272|
|Party Name:||Alan McSURELY et al. v. Thomas B. RATLIFF et al. October Term, 1967.|
|Case Date:||March 18, 1968|
|Court:||United States Supreme Court|
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.
Former decision, 389 U.S. 949, 88 S.Ct. 313; 390 U.S. 914, 88 S.Ct. 845.
Facts and opinion, D.C., 282 F.Supp. 848.
Dan Jack Combs, Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler and Morton Stavis, for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, for the United States.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The stay heretofore granted, 390 U.S. 914, 88 S.Ct. 845, is continued for 30 days in order to afford the appellants an opportunity to apply to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for a stay. If such timely application is made, the stay entered by this Court shall remain in effect until the Court of Appeals acts on that application.
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP