390 U.S. 412 (1968), 1113, Mcsurely v. Ratliff

Docket Nº:No. 1113.
Citation:390 U.S. 412, 88 S.Ct. 1112, 19 L.Ed.2d 1272
Party Name:Alan McSURELY et al. v. Thomas B. RATLIFF et al. October Term, 1967.
Case Date:March 18, 1968
Court:United States Supreme Court
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 412

390 U.S. 412 (1968)

88 S.Ct. 1112, 19 L.Ed.2d 1272

Alan McSURELY et al.

v.

Thomas B. RATLIFF et al.

October Term, 1967.

No. 1113.

United States Supreme Court.

March 18, 1968

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.

Former decision, 389 U.S. 949, 88 S.Ct. 313; 390 U.S. 914, 88 S.Ct. 845.

Facts and opinion, D.C., 282 F.Supp. 848.

COUNSEL

Dan Jack Combs, Arthur Kinoy, William M. Kunstler and Morton Stavis, for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, for the United States.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The stay heretofore granted, 390 U.S. 914, 88 S.Ct. 845, is continued for 30 days in order to afford the appellants an opportunity to apply to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for a stay. If such timely application is made, the stay entered by this Court shall remain in effect until the Court of Appeals acts on that application.

...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP