United States v. Garrett
| Decision Date | 23 April 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 15223.,15223. |
| Citation | 395 F.2d 769 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert James GARRETT, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit |
Thomas A. Foran, U. S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Phillip H. Ginsberg, George E. Bullwinkel, Raymond J. Smith, Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, DUFFY, Senior Circuit Judge, and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.
There has been received and filed in the office of the Clerk of this Court the opinion and certified copy of the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States dated March 18, 1968, Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247. The said judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States provided as follows:
"IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment be, and the same is hereby, reversed as to petitioner Garrett, and that the same be remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court."
On consideration whereof, it is ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment entered by this Court on December 7, 1966 in appeal No. 15223, United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Robert James Garrett, Defendant-Appellant, 7 Cir., 371 F.2d 296, be vacated and set aside.
It is further ordered and adjudged by this Court that the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, entered therein against defendant Robert James Garrett, be reversed, and that this cause be, and the same is hereby remanded to the said United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, as ordered in the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States entered on March 18, 1968.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Townsend
... ... The United States Supreme Court has declared that it is unwilling to prohibit the employment of the method of ... ...
-
United States v. Grimes, 22382.
...88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968) (ownership of suitcase containing incriminating evidence), on remand sub nom. United States v. Garrett, 395 F.2d 769 (5th Cir. 1968). 4 His insanity defense was substantial, and he duly moved for bifurcation at trial. Compare Pope v. United States, 372 F......
-
Harper v. State of Missouri
... ... STATE OF MISSOURI et al., Appellees ... No. 25613 ... United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ... June 14, 1968. William Thomas Harper, pro ... ...
-
Trial Proceedings and Motions
...sufficient to support a finding of the condition necessary to show relevancy. Simmons v. United States, 390 U. S. 377 (1968), on remand 395 F.2d 769 (7th Cir. 1968), appeal after remand 424 F.2d 1235 (7th Cit. 1970). An accused by testifying on a preliminary matter, on a motion to suppress,......
-
Trial proceedings and motions
...su൶cient to support a inding of the condition necessary to show relevancy. Simmons v. United States, 390 U. S. 377 (1968), on remand 395 F.2d 769 (7th Cir. 1968), appeal after remand 424 F.2d 1235 (7th Cit. 1970). An accused by testifying on a preliminary matter, on a motion to suppress, do......
-
Trial Proceedings and Motions
...sufficient to support a finding of the condition necessary to show relevancy. Simmons v. United States, 390 U. S. 377 (1968), on remand 395 F.2d 769 (7th Cir. 1968), appeal after remand 424 F.2d 1235 (7th Cit. 1970). An accused by testifying on a preliminary matter, on a motion to suppress,......
-
Trial proceedings and motions
...su൶cient to support a inding of the condition necessary to show relevancy. Simmons v. United States, 390 U. S. 377 (1968), on remand 395 F.2d 769 (7th Cir. 1968), appeal after remand 424 F.2d 1235 (7th Cit. 1970). An accused by testifying on a preliminary matter, on a motion to suppress, do......