State v. Jacobson

Decision Date28 April 1981
Docket NumberNo. 80-234,80-234
Citation398 So.2d 857
PartiesThe STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Alan Max JACOBSON, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Janet Reno, State Atty. and Theda R. James, Asst. State Atty., for appellant.

Snowden, Kornreich, Reichenthal & Midgall and Charles H. Snowden, Miami, for appellee.

Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and NESBITT, JJ.

BARKDULL, Judge.

The state brings this appeal from an order of the Dade County Circuit Court, which granted a motion to suppress in favor of the movant, defendant Alan Jacobson.

This is a typical Miami International Airport drug courier profile case, in which Officers Johnson and Pearson of the Dade County Public Safety Department Airport Narcotics Detail, while in plainclothes, observed defendant Jacobson and his companion (one Baker) at 12:45 P.M. on July 31, 1979, at the National Airlines Ticket counter. Defendant Jacobson and Baker were inquiring at the ticket counter about a National flight to Los Angeles, a known "narcotics source" city. Because the defendants appeared "obviously nervous and hurried", were carrying very little luggage for a trip to the west coast, had arrived late at the airport (missing a scheduled flight), and had approached the National Airlines ticket counter holding a Western Airlines ticket, Officers Johnson and Pearson determined, from their long experience in such narcotics matters, to approach the defendants. Officer Johnson approached Baker and Officer Pearson approached defendant Jacobson. Officer Pearson identified himself to Jacobson, who agreed to talk with the officer, agreed to show the officer his airline ticket (a one-way ticket from Miami to Los Angeles) and his driver's license, and acknowledged that he was from Florida although he responded to the other police officer (Johnson) that he was from Los Angeles. Jacobson also agreed to allow the officers to search his tote bag which Officer Pearson did, finding nothing, but looking up to notice "the look of sheer fright" on Jacobson's face. As he saw Officer Johnson handcuffing defendant Baker, Jacobson then proceeded to run out of the terminal; he was pursued and eventually overtaken by Pearson and two uniformed officers who arrested Jacobson and returned him to the terminal. At the terminal, nothing further was found in the tote bag, but a pat-down of Jacobson revealed clear plastic bags (later determined to contain cocaine) attached to his legs.

At the hearing on the motion to suppress the evidence seized, the trial court determined that the initial stop was illegal and that, based on the totality of the circumstances, there was no voluntary consent. He therefore entered an order granting the defendants' motion to suppress. The State has brought this appeal from the order. We reverse.

Assuming that there was a primary illegality, the evidence with regard to the present seizure shows that it was not effectuated through an exploitation of the illegality,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • State v. Johnson
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • May 21, 1990
    ...bushes was "independent act involving a calculated risk" rather than spontaneous reaction to illegal arrest); State v. Jacobson, 398 So.2d 857, 859 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1981) (defendant fled after illegal drug-courier-profile stop; drugs found during search, on recapture, held admissible); mod.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT