United States v. Eureka & P.R. Co.
Decision Date | 23 November 1889 |
Citation | 40 F. 419 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. EUREKA & P.R. CO. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Nevada |
Syllabus by the Court.
The defendant, a railroad corporation, purchased for use upon its locomotives and cars, wood severed from the public mineral lands. Held, that such purchase and use was unlawful, and that the United States could recover from defendant the value of the wood so severed and purchased by it.
J. W Whitcher, U.S. Atty., and Henry Rivers, for plaintiff.
Wren & Chesney, for defendant.
This is an action of replevin, brought by plaintiff to recover from defendant the possession of 2,000 cords of pine, cedar, and mahogany wood, or the value thereof, alleged at the sum of $10,000, in case recovery of possession of said wood cannot be had. The complainant alleges that said wood was severed from the public lands of plaintiff, in the state of Nevada, without the consent of plaintiff; that on or about December 1, 1888 at the county of Eureka, in said state, defendant wrongfully, unlawfully, and without plaintiff's consent took all of said wood from the possession of plaintiff, to its damage in said sum of $10,000. The answer of defendant denies plaintiff's ownership of said wood, or that there was more than 550 cords of the same; denies that it was severed from the public lands of the United States; denies that at the date alleged, or at any other time, defendant wrongfully, unlawfully, or without plaintiff's consent took all or any of said wood from the possession of plaintiff. It alleges that defendant is operating its railroad, running from the town of Eureka to the town of Palisade, in said Eureka county, a distance of about 85 miles; that the wood used upon its locomotives was not cut by defendant, but the same was delivered to it by residents of the state, along the line of said road, for use upon its locomotives, and in operating its railroad; denies that said wood was or is of any greater value than four dollars per cord. The case was tried by the court, without a jury. The whole case is summed up in the findings of fact, which are as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Copper Queen Consolidated Mining Co.
... ... resident was also a citizen or not. United States v ... Smith, 11 F. 487, 8 Saw. 101; United States v ... Eureka and P.R. Co., 40 F. 419; United States v ... Richmond Min. Co., 40 F. 415 ... The act ... of Congress of June 3, 1878, does not empower ... ...
-
United States v. Richmond Mining Co.
... ... alleged value of $2,100, the same being at the yard and ... premises of the defendant at the town of Eureka, in this ... state. The complainant alleges that said coal was ... manufactured from wood cut and removed from the unsurveyed ... public timber ... ...