Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Florida Police Benev. Ass'n, MM-180

Decision Date09 July 1981
Docket NumberNo. MM-180,MM-180
Citation400 So.2d 1302
PartiesDEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY SAFETY AND MOTOR VEHICLES, Appellant, v. FLORIDA POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION and Marcus A. McGowan, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Edwin E. Strickland, Gen. Counsel, and Michael J. Alderman, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Edward S. Jaffry, of Horne, Rhodes, Jaffry, Stephens, Bryant, Horne & Chapman, Tallahassee, for appellees.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and John J. Rimes, Asst. Atty. Gen., amicus curiae.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Chief Judge.

Citing State Dept. of Administration v. Stevens, 344 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), a DOAH hearing officer in this Section 120.56 rule challenge proceeding held that the Highway Patrol's general order 40, prescribing standards of physical fitness for patrolmen, and general order 43, prescribing guidelines for supervisors in assessing discipline for deficiencies in patrolmen's conduct, are illicit rules and hence invalid, because they were not subjected to formal rulemaking under Section 120.54. 1 Fla.Admin.L.Repts. A-12 (1979). In holding that these general orders were not exempt as "internal management memoranda" from the rulemaking requirement, Section 120.52(14)(a), the hearing officer lamented the apparent application of Stevens to this case, saying:

The instant case demonstrates how Rule challenges present serious problems to the agencies in establishing and carrying out policies applicable only to agency employees which are not formally promulgated as rules. Once the agency attempts to enforce such a policy on employees who fail or refuse to comply, the policy begins to affect private interests.

We think the general orders in the present case qualify for the "internal management memoranda" exemption from rulemaking and that this case, considered in the light of judicial decisions rendered after the hearing officer ruled in this case, can and should be distinguished from Stevens. The "bumping" guidelines that Stevens characterized as rules were virtually self-executing, intended "by their own effect to create rights, or to require compliance, or otherwise to have the direct and consistent effect of law." McDonald v. Dept. of Banking and Finance, 346 So.2d 569, 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). General orders 40 and 43 on the other hand, were effective in themselves only as guidelines, subject in application to the discretion of the enforcing officer. In this case, for example, the contestant's severe overweight condition brought on a series of disciplinary responses, of increasing...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Schluter
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 1997
    ...that each was to apply only under "certain circumstances." Consequently, as in Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Florida Police Benevolent Ass'n, 400 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), these statements should be considered effective merely as guidelines, in that their applicatio......
  • Department of Revenue v. Novoa, 98-2697.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 12, 1999
    ...intended only to afford guidance and not to have the force and effect of law. See Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Florida Police Benevolent Ass'n, 400 So.2d 1302, 1303 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). See also Webster v. South Fla. Water Management Dist., 367 So.2d 734, 734 (Fla. 4th......
  • Westchester General Hosp. v. State, Dept. of Health & Rehabilitative Services, s. TT-222
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 22, 1982
    ...proceeding. Incipient, non-rule policy may be explicated at a Chapter 120.57 proceeding. Dept. of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Florida Police Benevolent Assoc., 400 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Florida Cities Water Company v. Florida Public Service Commission, 384 So.2d 1280 (Fla.1......
  • Amos v. Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Dist. IV
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 30, 1983
    ...Health and Rehabilitative Services v. Stevens, 344 So.2d 290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Florida Police Benevolent Association, 400 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Florida State University v. Dann, 400 So.2d 1304 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981).8 Florida Citi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The scarecrow in McDonald's Farm: a fairy tale about administrative law.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 73 No. 3, March 1999
    • March 1, 1999
    ...and the doctrine of stare decisis). [15] Department of Highway and Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Florida Police Benevolent Association, 400 So. 2d 1302, 1304 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1981) (characterizing the proceeding as a "marginal rule challenge"). [16] Straughn, 338 So. 2d at 834 n.3. [17] Patr......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT