Home Savings Association v. Tappan Company

Decision Date06 January 1969
Docket NumberNo. 25706.,25706.
Citation403 F.2d 201
PartiesHOME SAVINGS ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. The TAPPAN COMPANY, Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Ken Griffin, Odessa, Tex., for appellant.

Charles E. Galey, Brock, Wright, Waters & Galey, Lubbock, Tex., John P. Dennison, Pecos, Tex., for appellee.

Before BELL and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and ROBERTS, District Judge.

ROBERTS, District Judge:

Lawrence Black Homes, Inc., a contractor from Odessa, Texas, wanted to build an apartment building in Pecos, Texas. Black applied to appellant on March 14, 1966, for financing commitments on the proposed construction. A commitment letter was issued to Black on April 15, 1966, granting a loan for $305,000. at 6½ per cent interest for twenty (20) years. Another commitment letter was issued on the same day from appellant to Black, granting an interim financing loan on advances made as to the date of the final loan closing. On April 18, 1966, pursuant to the commitment letter, Black executed and delivered a note for $305,000. to appellant and a deed of trust securing the note by a lien on the land on which the apartment house was to be constructed.

Also on April 18, 1966, appellee entered into a contract with Black to furnish appliances for the apartments, for which appellee was to be paid $19,456.70. This contract was signed and witnessed by an officer of appellant. The contract provided in part:

"Terms of payment: Close of loan — not later than September 1, 1966.
Special conditions: Letter from Home Savings and Loan to pay Tappan on close."

On the same date appellant wrote the following letter to appellee.

"Home Savings Association hereby agrees to withhold from loan proceeds and pay to the Tappan Company $19,456.70 for equipment as enumerates on the builder\'s sale contract # 4128, signed by Lawrence Black Homes, Inc. and R. A. Batson, District Manager for the Tappan Company, issued April 18, 1966.
The funds will be disbursed upon completion and acceptance of the improvements by Home Savings Association and closing of the permanent loan."

Appellee performed its part of the contract by furnishing the appliances, and it submitted invoices to appellant for payment. In that regard, the following letter was written appellee by appellant on August 18, 1966:

"Thank you for the invoices submitted to be paid from the proceeds of the captioned loan.
We will forward our check upon closing of this loan in accordance with the terms of your contract with Mr. Black and our letter of commitment to you.
We have just made another inspection of the property and the progress is very good, so the loan should be closing in the near future.
If we may be of further service to you please let us know."

On September 1, 1966, there was $69,686.90 in Black's account held by appellant from which disbursements could have been made. However, appellee was never paid for the appliances and on December 15, 1966, filed suit against Black and appellant.

Black was unable to close the permanent loan because of financial problems. On June 6, 1967, appellant foreclosed its deed of trust, and a trustee's deed to the property was executed by the president of appellant conveying the property to appellant. The purchase price recited was $275,000.00. On June 28, 1967, appellant sold the apartment house to a George Johnson, the consideration being $20,000.00 cash and a note for $305,000.00 bearing 6¾ per cent interest. Appellee then joined Johnson as a defendant.

In his suit below, appellee sought to establish a constitutional lien on the land and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO v. NLRB
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • July 11, 1974
    ... ... investigation, receiving affidavits from the company to establish the objectionable conduct. The Regional 496 ... ...
  • Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. Wilson
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Texas
    • September 15, 1989
    ...loan was a condition or even a covenant effecting the defendants' performance of their obligations.39 See Home Savings Association v. Tappan Company, 403 F.2d 201, 203 (5th Cir.1968) (conditions precedent not favored under Texas law); Willow Bend National Bank v. Commonwealth Mortgage Corpo......
  • Mularz v. Greater Park City Co., 78-1969
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • June 12, 1980
    ...to be made on the occurrence of an event which does not occur, payment must be made within a reasonable time. Home Savings Ass'n v. Tappan Co., 403 F.2d 201, 203 (5th Cir. 1968); Hood v. Gordy Homes, Inc., 267 F.2d 882, 885-86 (4th Cir. 1959). See Shull v. Sexton, 154 Colo. 311, 390 P.2d 31......
  • Lockwood v. Wolf Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • October 6, 1980
    ...precedent when the alleged condition is peculiarly within the control of one of the contracting parties. See Home Savings Association v. Tappan Co., 403 F.2d 201, 203 (5 Cir. 1968). The disputed contract in Home Savings contained a promise to disburse funds "on closing" of a loan. The court......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT