Volpe v. Federation of Civic Associations

Decision Date27 March 1972
Docket NumberNo. 71-931,71-931
Citation92 S.Ct. 1290,31 L.Ed.2d 489,405 U.S. 1030
PartiesJohn A. VOLPE v. D. C. FEDERATION OF CIVIC ASSOCIATIONS
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE BURGER, concurring.

I concur in the denial of certiorari in this case, but solely out of considerations of timing. Questions of great importance to the Washington D.C., area are presented by the petition, not the least of which is whether the Court of appeals has, for a second time, unjustifiably frustrated the efforts of the Executive Branch to comply with the will of Congress as rather clearly expressed in § 23 of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968, 82 Stat. 827.* If we were to grant the writ, however, it would be almost a year before we could render a decision in the case. It seems preferable, therefore, that we stay our hand. In these circumstances Congress may, of course, take any further legislative action it deems necessary to make unmistakably clear its intentions with respect to the project, even to the point of limiting or prohibiting judicial review of its directives in this respect.

* Certain of the provisions of § 23 of the Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1968 were apparently enacted in response to the decision in D.C. Federation of Civic Assns., Inc. v. Airis, 129 U.S. App. D.C. 125, 391 F. 2d 478, in which it was held that the planning and construction of this project had to be carried out in strict compliance with the procedural requirements of Title 7 of the D.C. Code. Section 23(a) of the Act provides that "[n]otwithstanding any other provision of law, or any court decisions ... to the contrary, the Secretary of Transportation and the government of the District of Columbia shall ... construct" certain specified "routes on the Interstate System within the District of Columbia." (Emphasis added.) In § 23(b), Congress singled out four particular projects, including this one, for special treatment by providing that work on those projects was to commend "[n]ot later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this section." In an earlier phase of the litigation involved in the instant petition, the Court of Appeals rejected the petitioners' contention that § 23 rendered inapplicable the pre-construction planning and public hearing requirements set out in various sections of Title 23 of the United States Code. D.C. Federation of Civic...

To continue reading

Request your trial
155 cases
  • Long Beach City Employees Assn. v. City of Long Beach
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • 19 June 1986
  • Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, Denver, Colo., Nos. 74-1349
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 16 September 1975
  • Coalition On Sensible Transp. Inc. v. Dole
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • 24 July 1986
    ...minimize harm to parkland. D.C. Federation of Civic Ass'ns v. Volpe, 459 F.2d 1231, 1239 (D.C.Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1030, 92 S.Ct. 1290, 31 L.Ed.2d 489 (1972). The Secretary also may not wholly rely upon representations of state or local officials to take unspecified future acti......
  • Stop H-3 Ass'n v. Dole
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 21 August 1984
    ...exist, e.g., D.C. Federation of Civic Associations v. Volpe, 459 F.2d 1231, 1239 (D.C.Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1030, 92 S.Ct. 1290, 31 L.Ed.2d 489 (1972), the language, intent, and scope of FAHA lead me to conclude that Congress took the choice of planning a highway as a given unde......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • CHAPTER 12 PRACTICE BEFORE STATE MINING AGENCIES
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Natural Resources Administrative Law and Procedure (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...ex parte contacts were to be prohibited. [14] See, D.C. Fed'n of Civic Ass'ns v. Volpe, 459 F.2d 1231 (D.C. Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 1030 (1972), where the court suggested that ex parte communications were unacceptable except in actions that were "purely legislative." 459 F.2d at ......
  • Condemnation of low income residential communities under the takings clause.
    • United States
    • UCLA Journal of Environmental Law & Policy Vol. 23 No. 2, December 2005
    • 22 December 2005
    ...& LUBEROFF, supra, note 82, at 88. (89.) See D.C. Federation of Civic Assoc'n v. Volpe, 459 F.2d 1231 (D.C. Cir 1971), cert. denied 405 U.S. 1030 (1972); Zachary M. Schrag, The Freeway Fight in Washington, D.C.: The Three Sisters Bridge in Three Administrations, 30 J. URB. HIST. 648 (90......
  • CHAPTER 10 LOCALIZED LITIGATION
    • United States
    • FNREL - Special Institute Mineral Resources Permitting (FNREL)
    • Invalid date
    ...tainted by political influence. The test of D.C. Federation of Civic Associations v. Volpe, 459 F.2d. 1231 (D.C. Cir. 1971), cert. denied 405 U.S. 1030 (1972), is that if a decision was influenced "in whole or in part" by the political pressure, it is invalid. E. Choice of Venue for Litigat......
  • A Jurisdictional View of the United States Constitution
    • United States
    • Connecticut Bar Association Connecticut Bar Journal No. 83, 2009
    • Invalid date
    ...Mitchell, 333 F. Supp. 582 ( D.C. 1971), aff'd, 405 U.S. 1000, 31 L.Ed. 2d 471, 92 S.Ct. 1289 (1972) and 405 U.S. 1000, 31 L.Ed. 2d 471, 92 S.Ct. 1290 (1972). These cases were brought by broadcasters, not cigarette manufacturers. The court reasoned that banning the advertising did not depri......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT