407 F.2d 173 (2nd Cir. 1969), 153, Japan Line, Limited v. Sabre Shipping Corp.
|Docket Nº:||153, 32566.|
|Citation:||407 F.2d 173|
|Party Name:||JAPAN LINE, LTD., Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd., Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd., Nippon Yusen Kaisha, Ltd., Yamashita-Shinnihon Steamship Company, Ltd., and Maritime Company of the Philippines, Petitioners, v. SABRE SHIPPING CORPORATION, Respondent.|
|Case Date:||January 14, 1969|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit|
Argued Nov. 7, 1968.
Philip A. Ryan, Washington, D.C. (Jiro Murase, Gregor F. Gregorich and Banker & McKenzie, New York City, on the brief), for petitioners, Japan Line, Ltd., Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd., Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd., Nippon Yusen Kaisha, Ltd., and Yamashita-Shinnihon Steamship Company, Ltd.
Peter J. Gartland, New York City (A. Vernon Carnahan and Donovan, Leisure, Newton & Irvine, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner Maritime Co. of the Philippines.
Victor S. Friedman, New York City (Leon Silverman, Linda R. Blumkin and Strasser, Spiegelberg, Fried & Frank, New York City, on the brief), for respondent.
John P. Meade, Washington, D.C. (Leonard G. James, Washington, D.C., F. Conger Fawcett, San Francisco, Cal., and Graham & James, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for Pacific Coast European Conference, amicus curiae.
Before MEDINA, WATERMAN and MOORE, Circuit Judges.
MEDIAN, Circuit Judge:
There is before us a petition for a writ of certiorari, in a civil anti-trust case, to review the interlocutory rulings of Judge Ryan, in the Southern District of New York, denying applications for a stay and for other relief. In the exercise of our discretion we deny the petition, without reaching the merits. See Rule 21 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. An application for certification under 28 U.S.C., Section 1292(b) was denied by Judge Ryan.
This is an action pursuant to the provisions of Section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C., Section 15, and Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C., Sections 1, 2. The complaint requests a recovery of $49,000,000 in damages, attorneys' fees and injunctive relief. Petitioners, defendants in the action, are members of the Japan Atlantic & Gulf Conference and the New York Freight Bureau (Hong Kong) Conference. Plaintiff Sabre Shipping Corporation is an independent. The gist of the anti-trust charge is that prior to 1962 petitioners and other defendants did most of the business of shipping goods in the Hong Kong-United States and Japan-United States trade
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP