407 So.2d 907 (Fla. 1981), 61440, Ford v. State
|Docket Nº:||61440, 61450.|
|Citation:||407 So.2d 907|
|Party Name:||Alvin Bernard FORD, Petitioner/Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent/Appellee.|
|Case Date:||December 04, 1981|
|Court:||Supreme Court of Florida|
Laurin A. Wollan, Jr., Tallahassee and Raymond W. Russell, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner/appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Joy B. Shearer, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for respondent/appellee.
We have for consideration an appeal from an order of the circuit court denying a motion for post-conviction relief, an original petition for writ of habeas corpus, and an application for stay of execution.
Petitioner Ford was convicted of murder in the first degree. A separate sentencing proceeding was held before the trial jury, which recommended that petitioner be sentenced to death. The trial judge, in accordance with the jury's recommendation, sentenced him to death. The judgment and sentence were affirmed by this Court. Ford v. State, 374 So.2d 496 (Fla.1979).
The Supreme Court of the United States denied a petition for writ of certiorari. Ford v. Florida, 445 U.S. 972, 100 S.Ct. 1666, 64 L.Ed.2d 249 (1980).
Petitioner has also challenged his conviction by filing a habeas corpus proceeding in this Court, in which he joined 122 other persons under sentence of death, challenging this Court's purported review of extra record material in capital appeals. Relief was denied in Brown v. Wainwright, 392 So.2d 1327 (Fla.1981), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 102 S.Ct. ----, 70 L.Ed.2d ----, 30 Cr.L. 4066 (Nov. 2, 1981).
Petitioner further challenged his conviction and sentence in a motion for post-conviction relief filed in the circuit court. Petitioner has appealed from the order denying this motion for post-conviction relief. The state has filed a motion to quash this appeal and a motion to affirm the trial judge.
Petitioner has also filed with this Court a petition for writ of habeas corpus arguing that counsel for him failed to present to this Court meritorious issues relating directly to the validity of the conviction and sentence in this case and thereby deprived him of a meaningful direct appeal in contravention of the sixth, eighth, and fourteenth amendments to the Constitution of the United States. He asks that we grant him a belated appellate review from the judgment and death sentence of the trial court.
Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP