Keown v. The St. Louis Railroad Co.

Decision Date17 July 1897
Citation41 S.W. 929,141 Mo. 86
PartiesKeown v. The St. Louis Railroad Company, Appellant
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

141 Mo. 86 at 96.

Original Opinion of July 17, 1897, Reported at: 141 Mo. 86.

Motion for rehearing overruled.

OPINION

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

PER CURIAM.

-- In the motion for rehearing plaintiff's counsel lay stress on the observation of the court that the original conclusion in the case was expressed "with some misgivings." From that remark it is argued that the question of defendant's negligence is one about which fair minded men might differ, and hence that it is one for the jury as a question of fact.

The "misgivings" of the court were as to whether or not the case was clear enough to warrant the decision of the issue of defendant's negligence as a matter of law. We do not dispute in the slightest the rule plaintiff asserts, as to the right of plaintiff to have the benefit of the most favorable view of the facts that may reasonably be taken of them. Giving plaintiff the benefit of that view, we had some doubts as to whether or not plaintiff had a case properly entitled to be submitted to the jury on the question of defendant's negligence. We finally reached the conclusion that she had not such a case, after giving the facts the best consideration we could. We did not intend, in announcing that result, to intimate any denial of the rule invoked by plaintiff touching the state of facts necessary to warrant the judgment originally ordered on this appeal.

But the question whether or not in any case given testimony tends to prove negligence is a question for the court. And though it may sometimes be difficult of solution, the court is bound to solve the difficulty as best it can, and declare its ruling accordingly. This division did so; and on reconsideration of the subject adheres to the judgment first announced. The motion for rehearing is overruled, with the concurrence of all the judges of the first division.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Sloop v. Wabash Railroad Company
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • 7 Abril 1902
    ...be, and whether it be direct or inferential, its weight and sufficiency must be determined by a jury. Twohey v. Fruin 96 Mo. 104; Keown v. Railroad, 141 Mo. 86; George Railroad, 40 Mo.App. 433; Taylor v. Short, 38 Mo.App. 21; McQuillins Pleading and Practice, sec. 796; Thompson on Trials, s......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT