412 U.S. 430 (1973), 72-6198, Douglas v. Buder

Docket Nº:No. 72-6198
Citation:412 U.S. 430, 93 S.Ct. 2199, 37 L.Ed.2d 52
Party Name:Douglas v. Buder
Case Date:June 04, 1973
Court:United States Supreme Court
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 430

412 U.S. 430 (1973)

93 S.Ct. 2199, 37 L.Ed.2d 52

Douglas

v.

Buder

No. 72-6198

United States Supreme Court

June 4, 1973

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO

THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI

Syllabus

Petitioner, who had been given a suspended sentence for manslaughter and placed on probation for four years, with a condition that "all arrests for any reason must be reported without delay," was thereafter involved in an automobile accident in Arkansas, for which he received a traffic citation. Eleven days later, he mentioned the citation to his probation officer, who notified respondent judge. At a hearing, the prosecutor and the probation officer recommended continued probation but respondent, stating that the failure to report the accident and the citation was not in "strict compliance with the terms of the probation," revoked probation and sentenced petitioner to jail on the original counts. The Missouri Supreme Court denied a writ of prohibition.

Held: The issuance of the traffic citation was not an "arrest" under either Missouri or Arkansas law, and the finding that petitioner had violated his probation conditions was so totally devoid of evidentiary support as to violate due process. Even were it clear that respondent held Missouri law to be that a traffic citation is the equivalent of an arrest, such an unforeseeable holding, retroactively applied, would also deprive petitioner of due process. Certiorari granted; 485 S.W.2d 609, reversed and remanded.

Per curiam opinion.

PER CURIAM.

In November, 1971, petitioner, a 50-year-old truck driver with no prior offenses, pleaded guilty to two counts of manslaughter and was given a suspended sentence and placed on probation for a period of four years by the respondent Missouri Circuit Court Judge. One of the conditions of probation was that "[a]ll arrests for any reason must be reported without delay to [petitioner's] probation and parole officer." In January, 1972, petitioner was involved in a seven-vehicle chain-reaction accident on an Arkansas highway. The driver of the

Page 431

first vehicle was issued a traffic citation for failure to yield the right of way, and petitioner, along with four other drivers involved in the accident, was issued. a citation for driving too fast for existing conditions. At the next scheduled meeting with his probation officer, 11 days after the accident...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP