416 U.S. 995 (1974), 73-5842, Ciuzio v. United States

Docket NºNo. 73-5842.
Citation416 U.S. 995, 94 S.Ct. 2410, 40 L.Ed.2d 774
Party NameEugene Robert CIUZIO v. UNITED STATES.
Case DateMay 13, 1974
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

Page 995

416 U.S. 995 (1974)

94 S.Ct. 2410, 40 L.Ed.2d 774

Eugene Robert CIUZIO

v.

UNITED STATES.

No. 73-5842.

United States Supreme Court.

May 13, 1974

Rehearing Denied June 17, 1974.

OPINION

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice BRENNAN, with whom Mr. Justice DOUGLAS and Mr. Justice MARSHALL, join, dissenting.

Successive prosecutions of petitioner and one Cioffi

Page 996

resulted from an alleged agreement to sell an undercover agent $500,000 worth of counterfeit 6-cent stamps and an alleged delivery to the agent of a sample sheet of four hundred of the stamps. The first prosecution was upon a two-count indictment that charged the pair in the first count with having attempted to sell stamps known to be falsely made, forged and counterfeited, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 472, and, in the second count, with conspiracy to violate the same section. The trial on that indictment ended with a directed verdict of acquittal on the first count as to Cioffi, a dismissal of the first count as to petitioner and a mistrial on the second count when the jury could not agree upon a verdict.

Instead of proceeding to a retrial on the second count, the Government abandoned its efforts under § 472 and procured a second indictment under 18 U.S.C. § 501 based upon the very same course of conduct. The second indictment was also a two-count indictment, the first count charging that the pair 'knowingly did possess with intent to use and sell, approximately four hundred forged and counterfeited postage stamps . . .,' in violation of § 501, and count 2 charging conspiracy to violate that section. The overt acts alleged were the same as in the first indictment and the evidence at the trials was much the same.

I

Petitioner and Cioffi unsuccessfully claimed that, since the second prosecution grew out of the same transaction, the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment barred the second prosecution. In my view the rejection of this claim was error. I adhere to the position that the Double Jeopardy Clause requires [94 S.Ct. 2411] the prosecution, except in most limited circumstances not present here, 'to join at one trial all the charges against a defendant that grow out of a single criminal act, occurrence, episode or transaction.' Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436,

Page 997

453-454, 90 S.Ct. 1189, 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970) (concurring opinion); see Mullin v. Wyoming, 414 U.S. 940, 94 S.Ct. 245, 38 L.Ed.2d 166 (1973) (dissenting opinion); Grubb v. Oklahoma, 409 U.S. 1017, 93 S.Ct. 450, 34 L.Ed.2d 309 (1972) (dissenting opinion); Miller v. Oregon, 405 U.S. 1047, 92 S.Ct. 1321, 31 L.Ed.2d 590 (1972) (dissenting opinion); Harris v. Washington, 404 U.S. 55, 57, 92 S.Ct. 183, 30 L.Ed.2d 212 (1971) (concurring opinion).

II

I would grant certiorari in any event to decide another Double Jeopardy claim argued by petitioner based upon the action of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in remanding for a new trial after reversing the conviction of petitioner and Cioffi under the second indictment, 487 F.2d 492 (1973).

The substantive § 501 first count alleged possession of the stamps 'with intent to use and sell.' Shortly before submission of the case to the jury, the indictment was redacted to delete all references to 'sell.' The redaction was acquiesced in by the prosecution when sought by the defense, apparently because the Government's evidence was insufficient to support the charge of possession with intent to 'sell.' The case thus went to the jury under instructions limited to the charge of possession with intent to 'use.' The Court of Appeals held, however, that the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
183 practice notes
  • 68 B.R. 690 (Bkrtcy.S.D.N.Y. 1986), 86 B 12238 through 86 B 12241 , In re McLean Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Bankruptcy Courts Second Circuit
    • December 29, 1986
    ...S.Ct. 137, 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979); International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 493 F.2d 112, 115 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 995, 94 S.Ct. 2409, 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). It is, therefore, fashioned in a way that is contingent on compliance with the order. This is often acc......
  • AGO 2007-024.
    • United States
    • Attorney General Opinions Connecticut
    • November 1, 2007
    ...due to objections to content violated the First Amendment); Bazaar v. Fortune, 476 F.2d 570 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 995 (1974)(university's attempt to prevent distribution of student magazine because it considered content to be in bad taste violated ......
  • 154 B.R. 660 (E.D.Pa. 1993), 93-0090, Sterling Supply Corp. v. Mullinax
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 3th Circuit Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • May 10, 1993
    ...669 F.2d 114, 122 (3d Cir.1982); International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 493 F.2d 112, 114 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 995, 94 S.Ct. 2409, 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). Mullinax would not be able to challenge the contempt citation until the case was fully Page 664 10 Neve......
  • 25 B.R. 869 (Bkrtcy.W.D.Mich. 1982), 81-0825, In re Haines & Baker Excavating, Inc.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Bankruptcy Courts Sixth Circuit
    • December 10, 1982
    ...94 S.Ct. 2378, 40 L.Ed.2d 756 (1974), Lv. to file Writ of Mandamus den. 416 U.S. 980, 94 S.Ct. 2413, 40 L.Ed.2d 777 (1974), Cert. Den. 416 U.S. 995, 94 S.Ct. 2409, 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974); National Labor Relations Board v. Vander Wal, 316 F.2d 631 (9th Cir.1963); McGoff v. Rapone, 78 F.R.D. 8......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
182 cases
  • 68 B.R. 690 (Bkrtcy.S.D.N.Y. 1986), 86 B 12238 through 86 B 12241 , In re McLean Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Bankruptcy Courts Second Circuit
    • December 29, 1986
    ...S.Ct. 137, 62 L.Ed.2d 89 (1979); International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 493 F.2d 112, 115 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 995, 94 S.Ct. 2409, 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). It is, therefore, fashioned in a way that is contingent on compliance with the order. This is often acc......
  • 154 B.R. 660 (E.D.Pa. 1993), 93-0090, Sterling Supply Corp. v. Mullinax
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 3th Circuit Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • May 10, 1993
    ...669 F.2d 114, 122 (3d Cir.1982); International Business Machines Corp. v. United States, 493 F.2d 112, 114 (2d Cir.1973), cert. denied, 416 U.S. 995, 94 S.Ct. 2409, 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974). Mullinax would not be able to challenge the contempt citation until the case was fully Page 664 10 Neve......
  • 25 B.R. 869 (Bkrtcy.W.D.Mich. 1982), 81-0825, In re Haines & Baker Excavating, Inc.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Bankruptcy Courts Sixth Circuit
    • December 10, 1982
    ...94 S.Ct. 2378, 40 L.Ed.2d 756 (1974), Lv. to file Writ of Mandamus den. 416 U.S. 980, 94 S.Ct. 2413, 40 L.Ed.2d 777 (1974), Cert. Den. 416 U.S. 995, 94 S.Ct. 2409, 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974); National Labor Relations Board v. Vander Wal, 316 F.2d 631 (9th Cir.1963); McGoff v. Rapone, 78 F.R.D. 8......
  • 550 F.Supp. 692 (D.Md. 1981), Civ. HM81-72, Butcher v. Robertshaw Controls Co.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 4th Circuit District of Maryland
    • July 31, 1981
    ...Florida E. Coast Ry. v. United States, 519 F.2d 1184 (5th Cir.1975); Curtis v. Everette, 489 F.2d 516 (3d Cir.1973) cert. denied, 416 U.S. 995, 94 S.Ct. 2409, 40 L.Ed.2d 774 (1974); Schulman v. Huck Finn, Inc., 472 F.2d 864 (8th Cir.1973); Leather's Best, Inc. v. S.S. Mormaclynx, 451 F.2d 8......
  • Request a trial to view additional results