418 U.S. 323 (1974), 72-617, Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.

Docket Nº:No. 72-617
Citation:418 U.S. 323, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789
Party Name:Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
Case Date:June 25, 1974
Court:United States Supreme Court

Page 323

418 U.S. 323 (1974)

94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789

Gertz

v.

Robert Welch, Inc.

No. 72-617

United States Supreme Court

June 25, 1974

Argued November 14, 1973

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

Syllabus

A Chicago policeman named Nuccio was convicted of murder. The victim's family retained petitioner, a reputable attorney, to represent them in civil litigation against Nuccio. An article appearing in respondent's magazine alleged that Nuccio's murder trial was part of a Communist conspiracy to discredit the local police, and it falsely stated that petitioner had arranged Nuccio's "frameup," implied that petitioner had a criminal [94 S.Ct. 2999] record, and labeled him a "Communist-fronter." Petitioner brought this diversity libel action against respondent. After the jury returned a verdict for petitioner, the District Court decided that the standard enunciated in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, which bars media liability for defamation of a public official absent proof that the defamatory statements were published with knowledge of their falsity or in reckless disregard of the truth, should apply to this suit. The court concluded that that standard protects media discussion of a public issue without regard to whether the person defamed is a public official as in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, supra, or a public figure, as in Curtis Publishing Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130. The court found that petitioner had failed to prove knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth, and therefore entered judgment n.o.v. for respondent. The Court of Appeals affirmed.

Held:

1. A publisher or broadcaster of defamatory falsehoods about an individual who is neither a public official nor a public figure may not claim the New York Times protection against liability for defamation on the ground that the defamatory statements concern an issue of public or general interest. Pp. 339-348.

(a) Because private individuals characteristically have less effective opportunities for rebuttal than do public officials and public figures, they are more vulnerable to injury from defamation. Because they have not voluntarily exposed themselves to increased risk of injury from defamatory falsehoods, they are also more deserving of recovery. The state interest in compensating

Page 324

injury to the reputation of private individuals is therefore greater than for public officials and public figures. Pp. 343-345.

(b) To extend the New York Times standard to media defamation of private persons whenever an issue of general or public interest is involved would abridge to an unacceptable degree the legitimate state interest in compensating private individuals for injury to reputation and would occasion the additional difficulty of forcing courts to decide on an ad hoc basis which publications and broadcasts address issues of general or public interest and which do not. Pp. 345-346.

(c) So long as they do not impose liability without fault, the States may define for themselves the appropriate standard of liability for a publisher or broadcaster of defamatory falsehood which injures a private individual and whose substance makes substantial danger to reputation apparent. Pp. 347-348.

2. The States, however, may not permit recovery of presumed or punitive damages when liability is not based on knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth, and the private defamation plaintiff who establishes liability under a less demanding standard than the New York Times test may recover compensation only for actual injury. Pp. 348-350.

3. Petitioner was neither a public official nor a public figure. Pp. 351-352.

(a) Neither petitioner's past service on certain city committees nor his appearance as an attorney at the coroner's inquest into the death of the murder victim made him a public official. P. 351.

(b) Petitioner was also not a public figure. Absent clear evidence of general fame or notoriety in the community and pervasive involvement in ordering the affairs of society, an individual should not be deemed a public figure for all aspects of his life. Rather, the public figure question should be determined by reference to the individual's participation in the particular controversy giving [94 S.Ct. 3000] rise to the defamation. Petitioner's role in the Nuccio affair did not make him a public figure. Pp. 351-352.

471 F.2d 801, reversed and remanded.

POWELL, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which WHITE, MARSHALL, BLACKMUN, and REHNQUIST, JJ., joined. BLACKMUN, J., filed a concurring opinion, post, p. 353. BURGER, C.J., post, p. 354, DOUGLAS, J., post, p. 355, BRENNAN, J., post, p. 361, and WHITE, J., post, p. 369, filed dissenting opinions.

Page 325

POWELL, J., lead opinion

MR. JUSTICE POWELL delivered the opinion of the Court.

This Court has struggled for nearly a decade to define the proper accommodation between the law of defamation and the freedoms of speech and press protected by the First Amendment. With this decision we return to that effort. We granted certiorari to reconsider the extent of a publisher's constitutional privilege against liability for defamation of a private citizen. 410 U.S. 925 (1973).

I

In 1968, a Chicago policeman named Nuccio shot and killed a youth named Nelson. The state authorities prosecuted Nuccio for the homicide and ultimately obtained a conviction for murder in the second degree. The Nelson family retained petitioner Elmer Gertz, a reputable attorney, to represent them in civil litigation against Nuccio.

Respondent publishes American Opinion, a monthly outlet for the views of the John Birch Society. Early in the 1960's, the magazine began to warn of a nationwide conspiracy to discredit local law enforcement agencies and create in their stead a national police force capable of supporting a Communist dictatorship. As part of the continuing effort to alert the public to this assumed danger, the managing editor of American Opinion commissioned an article on the murder trial of Officer Nuccio. For this purpose, he engaged a regular contributor to the magazine. In March, 1969, respondent published the resulting article under the title "FRAME-UP: Richard

Page 326

Nuccio And The War On Police." The article purports to demonstrate that the testimony against Nuccio at his criminal trial was false, and that his prosecution was part of the Communist campaign against the police.

In his capacity as counsel for the Nelson family in the civil litigation, petitioner attended the coroner's inquest into the boy's death and initiated actions for damages, but he neither discussed Officer Nuccio with the press nor played any part in the criminal proceeding. Notwithstanding petitioner's remote connection with the prosecution of Nuccio, respondent's magazine portrayed him as an architect of the "frame-up." According to the article, the police file on petitioner took "a big, Irish cop to lift." The article stated that petitioner had been an official of the

Marxist League for Industrial Democracy, originally known as the Intercollegiate Socialist Society, which has advocated the violent seizure of our government.

It labeled Gertz a "Leninist" and a "Communist-fronter." It also stated that Gertz had been an officer of the National Lawyers Guild, described as a Communist organization that "probably did more than any other outfit to plan the Communist attack on the Chicago police during the 1968 Democratic Convention."

These statements contained serious inaccuracies. The implication that petitioner had a criminal record was false. Petitioner had been a member and officer of the National Lawyers Guild some 15 years earlier, but there was no evidence that he or that organization had taken any part in planning the 1968 demonstrations in Chicago. There was also no basis for the charge that petitioner was a "Leninist" or a "Communist-fronter." And he had never been a member of the "Marxist League for Industrial Democracy" or the "Intercollegiate Socialist Society."

Page 327

The managing editor of American Opinion made no effort to verify or substantiate the charges against petitioner. Instead, he appended an editorial introduction [94 S.Ct. 3001] stating that the author had "conducted extensive research into the Richard Nuccio Case." And he included in the article a photograph of petitioner and wrote the caption that appeared under it: "Elmer Gertz of Red Guild harasses Nuccio." Respondent placed the issue of American Opinion containing the article on sale at newsstands throughout the country and distributed reprints of the article on the streets of Chicago.

Petitioner filed a diversity action for libel in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. He claimed that the falsehoods published by respondent injured his reputation as a lawyer and a citizen. Before filing an answer, respondent moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, apparently on the ground that petitioner failed to allege special damages. But the court ruled that statements contained in the article constituted libel per se under Illinois law, and that, consequently, petitioner need not plead special damages. 306 F.Supp. 310 (1969).

After answering the complaint, respondent filed a pretrial motion for summary judgment, claiming a constitutional privilege against liability for defamation.1 It asserted that petitioner was a public official or a public figure, and that the article concerned an issue of public interest and concern. For these reasons, respondent argued, it was entitled to invoke the privilege enunciated in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964). Under this rule, respondent would escape liability unless

Page 328

petitioner could prove publication of defamatory falsehood "with `actual malice' -- that is, with knowledge that it...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP
3842 practice notes
  • 108 F.Supp.3d 1299 (S.D.Fla. 2015), 9:14-CV-80781, Tobinick v. Novella
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 11th Circuit Southern District of Florida
    • June 4, 2015
    ...into a particular public controversy and thereby becomes a public figure for a limited range of issues." Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 345, 351, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974). Tobinick M.D. does not make any argument relating to its status as a public figure, nor do......
  • 19 F.Supp.2d 401 (E.D.Pa. 1998), C. A. 98-CV-2204, Rockwell v. Allegheny Health, Educ. & Research Foundation
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 3th Circuit Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • September 10, 1998
    ...and standing in the community, personal humiliation, or mental anguish or suffering." Id. (quoting Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 350, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974)). "[The defamed party] may recover for any injury done to his reputation and for any other injury......
  • 261 F.Supp.2d 303 (M.D.Pa. 2002), Civ. A. 3CV-97-616, Paul v. Hearst Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 3th Circuit Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • November 8, 2002
    ...fines levied by civil juries to punish reprehensible conduct and to deter its future occurrence." Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 348, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974). The First Amendment inquiry, therefore, is not guided by the amount of compensatory damages a plaintif......
  • 275 F.Supp.3d 1301 (N.D.Ala. 2017), 5:14-cv-00684-MHH, Lovingood v. Discovery Communications, Inc.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 11th Circuit Northern District of Alabama
    • August 1, 2017
    ...New York Times, Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 280, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964)); Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 342, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974); Curtis Publ’g Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 162-164, 87 S.Ct. 1975, 18 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1967) (......
  • Free signup to view additional results
3628 cases
  • 108 F.Supp.3d 1299 (S.D.Fla. 2015), 9:14-CV-80781, Tobinick v. Novella
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 11th Circuit Southern District of Florida
    • June 4, 2015
    ...into a particular public controversy and thereby becomes a public figure for a limited range of issues." Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 345, 351, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974). Tobinick M.D. does not make any argument relating to its status as a public figure, nor do......
  • 19 F.Supp.2d 401 (E.D.Pa. 1998), C. A. 98-CV-2204, Rockwell v. Allegheny Health, Educ. & Research Foundation
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 3th Circuit Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    • September 10, 1998
    ...and standing in the community, personal humiliation, or mental anguish or suffering." Id. (quoting Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 350, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974)). "[The defamed party] may recover for any injury done to his reputation and for any other injury......
  • 261 F.Supp.2d 303 (M.D.Pa. 2002), Civ. A. 3CV-97-616, Paul v. Hearst Corp.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 3th Circuit Middle District of Pennsylvania
    • November 8, 2002
    ...fines levied by civil juries to punish reprehensible conduct and to deter its future occurrence." Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 348, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974). The First Amendment inquiry, therefore, is not guided by the amount of compensatory damages a plaintif......
  • 275 F.Supp.3d 1301 (N.D.Ala. 2017), 5:14-cv-00684-MHH, Lovingood v. Discovery Communications, Inc.
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 11th Circuit Northern District of Alabama
    • August 1, 2017
    ...New York Times, Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254, 280, 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686 (1964)); Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 342, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974); Curtis Publ’g Co. v. Butts, 388 U.S. 130, 162-164, 87 S.Ct. 1975, 18 L.Ed.2d 1094 (1967) (......
  • Free signup to view additional results
21 firm's commentaries
  • Does the Plaintiff's need to destroy the anonymity of the speaker have precedence over the anonymous speaker's right to remain anonymous?
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • July 7, 2008
    ...correction not on the conscience of judges and juries but on the competition of other ideas.'") (quoting Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 339-40, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789 (1974)). 14. E.g. Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400, 415, 111 S.Ct. 1364, 113 L.Ed.2d 411 (1991) (defenda......
  • Liability for Commercial Speech: A Guide to False Advertising, Commercial Disparagement, and Related Claims
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • October 7, 2010
    ...85 (1966). A “public figure” is an individual who has assumed a role of prominence in the affairs of society. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 345 (1974). A corporation can also be a public figure under certain circumstances. Flotech, Inc. v. E.I. Du Pont de Nemours Co., 627 F. Su......
  • What is the proper standard for determining defamation of a company's products?
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • September 28, 1998
    ...dignity and worth of every human being—a concept at the root of any decent system of ordered liberty.'" (Id. quoting Gertz, supra, 418 U.S. at 341, 94 S.Ct. 2997, 41 L.Ed.2d 789.) However, while the Constitution permits private individuals to recover liability for damage to their reput......
  • How the First Amendment Affects Tort Law
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • December 14, 2012
    ...“[S]trict liability” or “liability without fault” may not be imposed upon First Amendment protected speech. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 340, 347 & n.10 (1974). For example, in United States v. National Treasury Employees Union, 513 U.S. 454 (1995), the First Amendment pre......
  • Free signup to view additional results
186 books & journal articles
  • The Best Puffery Article Ever
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review Nbr. 91-5, July 2006
    • July 1, 2006
    ...bad consumption, I do not mean to imply agreement that such a distinction is coherent or even desirable. [22] Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 341 (1974). [23] See infra notes 152-54 and accompanying text (citing and summarizing the issues in several commercial free-speech cases).......
  • Restraining false light: constitutional and common law limits on a "troublesome tort".
    • United States
    • Federal Communications Law Journal Vol. 61 Nbr. 3, June 2009
    • June 1, 2009
    ...concurring in part and dissenting in part); id. at 172-74 (Brennan, J., and White, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). (44.) 418 U.S. 323 (1974). Although some level of fault must be shown, a private figure need not prove actual malice. Id. at 345-47. For example, in many states......
  • Libel in cyberspace: a framework for addressing liability and jurisdictional issues in this new frontier.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 59 Nbr. 4, June 1996
    • June 22, 1996
    ...462 F.2d at 1176. (159) Id. (footnotes omitted). (160) See supra notes 104-59 and accompanying text. (161) Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 370 (1974) (White, J., dissenting) ("[D]efamed private citizen had to prove only a false publication that would subject him to hatred, c......
  • Rebel without a clause: the right "rights of students" in Nixon v. Board of Education and the shadow of freedom under Harper v. Poway.
    • United States
    • Ave Maria Law Review Vol. 6 Nbr. 1, September 2007
    • September 22, 2007
    ...libel such that the speech must be malicious or in reckless disregard for the truth to be actionable at law); Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 339 (1974) (holding there is no such thing as a false idea). (64.) WEINSTEIN, supra note 33, at 58. (65.) Id. (66.) 395 U.S. 444 (1969) (p......
  • Free signup to view additional results
1 provisions