Cummins v. District Township of Doon
Decision Date | 06 May 1890 |
Parties | CUMMINS v. DISTRICT TOWNSHIP OF DOON. |
Court | U.S. District Court — Northern District of Iowa |
Davis & Gault, for plaintiff.
Van Wagener & McMillan and Kaufmann & Guernsey, for defendant.
This action is based upon certain interest coupons attached to a series of bonds for the sum of $20,000, issued by the defendant, a school district in the county of Lyon, in this state. The defense is that the bonds were issued without consideration, without authority of law, and in violation of section 3, art. 11, of the constitution of Iowa, which provides that no municipal or political corporation within the state shall be allowed to become indebted in a sum exceeding 5 per cent. of the assessed valuation of the taxable property within the limits of the corporation, as shown by the last preceding state and county tax-lists. By written stipulation a jury was waived and the cause submitted to the court upon the evidence taken in writing, and after full and able arguments by counsel upon the legal questions involved. From the evidence submitted, I find the following facts:
(1) The defendant, the district township of Doon, is a school-district in Lyon county, Iowa, created under the provisions of the laws of the state of Iowa, having power to contract in its corporate name, to issue negotiable bonds and to sue and be sued in its corporate name. As originally constituted, the district included six congressional townships of land. From time to time other districts have been set off therefrom, until it now includes only two congressional townships.
(2) That the affairs of the district township from the date of its organization have been badly managed, and, through fraud and incompetency on part of the officers of the district, indebtedness to a very large extent has been created against the district, part of which was evidenced by bonds of the district, part by judgments against the district, and part by warrants or orders drawn on the different funds.
(3) That on or about the 14th day of June, 1881, the then officers of the district determined to undertake the refunding of the outstanding bonded indebtedness of the district, and to that end the board of directors of said district, on the 9th day of July, 1881, adopted the following resolution by an unanimous vote:
(4) That, in pursuance of said resolution, negotiable bonds, with interest coupons attached, were prepared and duly signed by the proper officers of the district; said bonds having printed thereon chapter 132 of the Acts of the 18th General Assembly of the state of Iowa. The following is a copy of the statute, and of the bonds and coupons:
(5) That B. L. Richards, named in the resolution of the directors of said district as the refunding agent to negotiate said bonds, sold on or about July 25, 1881, $10,000 of the bonds to plaintiff, who then resided at Lincoln, Ill., and on or about August 11, 1881, sold a further amount of $10,000 to said plaintiff, who paid in cash the par value of said bonds or in all the sum of $20,000 therefor. In making the purchase of said bonds the plaintiff relied upon the representations made to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The State ex rel. Clark County v. Hackmann
... ... Camden, 44 S.C ... 319, 51 Am. St. 855; Rose v. Road District, 275 Mo ... 603. (3) The Constitution does not specify the purpose for ... 10 of the Constitution of Missouri. District of Doon Twp ... v. Cummins, 142 U.S. 366, 35 L.Ed. 1047; Council ... Bluffs ... Constitution. In Doon Township v. Cummins, 142 U.S ... 366, it is said: ... "The ... ...
-
People ex rel. Van Dyke v. Colorado Cent. R. Co.
... ... 28th day of August, 1889, there was filed in the district ... court of Larimer county, in this state, a petition, the ... material ... ...
-
Shaw v. Independent School Dist. of Riverside
...showing that the constitutional limitation had been exceeded. The material questions arising in this case were before me in Cummins v. District of Doon, 42 F. 644, and therein held that bonds issued for refunding purposes under the provisions of chapter 132, Acts 18th Gen. Assem. Iowa, diff......