420 F.Supp. 177 (S.D.N.Y. 1976), 71 Civ. 602, Bright Tunes Music Corp. v. Harrisongs Music, Ltd.

Docket Nº:71 Civ. 602.
Citation:420 F.Supp. 177
Party Name:BRIGHT TUNES MUSIC CORP., Plaintiff, v. HARRISONGS MUSIC, LTD., et al., Defendants.
Case Date:August 31, 1976
Court:United States District Courts, 2nd Circuit

Page 177

420 F.Supp. 177 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)



HARRISONGS MUSIC, LTD., et al., Defendants.

No. 71 Civ. 602.

United States District Court, D. New York

Aug. 31, 1976

As Amended Sept. 1, 1976.

Page 178

Pryor, Cashman & Sherman, by Gideon Cashman, James A. Janowitz, New York City, for plaintiff.

Hardee, Barovick, Konecky & Braun, by Joseph J. Santora, Robert B. McKay, Michael Perlstein, New York City, for defendants Harrisongs Music, Ltd., George Harrison, Apple Records, Inc. and Apple Records, Ltd.

Leibman & Schreier, by Leonard S. Leibman, New York City, for defendant Broadcast Music, Inc.

Netter, Dowd, Ness, Alfieri & Stern, by Edward Berman, New York City, for defendant Hansen Publications, Inc.


OWEN, District Judge.

This is an action in which it is claimed that a successful song, My Sweet Lord, listing George Harrison as the composer, is plagiarized from an earlier successful song, He's So Fine, composed by Ronald Mack, recorded by a singing group called the "Chiffons," the copyright of which is owned by plaintiff, Bright Tunes Music Corp.

He's So Fine, recorded in 1962, is a catchy tune consisting essentially of four repetitions of a very short basic musical phrase, "sol-mi-re," (hereinafter motif A), 1 altered as necessary to fit the words, followed by four repetitions of another short basic musical phrase, "sol-la-do-la-do," (hereinafter motif B). 2 While neither motif is novel, the four repetitions of A, followed by four repetitions of B, is a highly unique pattern. 3 In addition, in the second use of the motif B series, there is a grace note inserted making the phrase go "sol-la-do-la-re-do." 4

(Image Omitted)

(Image Omitted)

(Image Omitted)

My Sweet Lord, recorded first in 1970, also uses the same motif A (modified to suit the words) four times, followed by motif B, repeated three times, not four. In place of He's So Fine's fourth repetition of motif B, My Sweet Lord has a transitional passage of musical attractiveness of the same approximate length, with the identical grace note in the identical second repetition. 5 The harmonies of both songs are identical. 6

Page 179

George Harrison, a former member of The Beatles, was aware of He's So Fine. In the United States, it was No. 1 on the billboard charts for five weeks; in England, Harrison's home country, it was No. 12 on the charts on June 1, 1963, a date upon which one of the Beatle songs was, in fact, in first position. For seven weeks in 1963, He's So Fine was one of the top hits in England.

According to Harrison, the circumstances of the composition of My Sweet Lord were as follows. Harrison and his group, which include an American black gospel singer named Billy Preston, 7 were in Copenhagen, Denmark, on a singing engagement. There was a press conference involving the group going on backstage. Harrison slipped away from the press conference and went to a room upstairs and began "vamping" some guitar chords, fitting on to the chords he was playing the words, "Hallelujah" and "Hare Krishna" in various ways. 8 During the course of this vamping, he was alternating between what musicians call a Minor II chord and a Major V chord.

At some point, germinating started and he went down to meet with others of the group, asking them to listen, which they did, and everyone began to join in, taking first "Hallelujah" and then "Hare Krishna" and putting them into four part harmony. Harrison obviously started using the "Hallelujah," etc., as repeated sounds, and from there developed the lyrics, to wit, "My Sweet Lord," "Dear, Dear Lord," etc. In any event, from this very...

To continue reading