Jacobson v. Kidd
Decision Date | 17 September 2018 |
Docket Number | S-17-0332 |
Parties | Matthew T. JACOBSON, Appellant (Defendant), v. Aimee V. KIDD f/k/a Aimee V. Jacobson, Appellee (Plaintiff). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Representing Appellant: Linda J. Steiner and Abigail E. Fournier, Steiner Law, LLC, Cheyenne, Wyoming.
Representing Appellee: No appearance.
Guardian Ad Litem: Jacqueline K. Brown, Brown Law Office, P.C., Casper, Wyoming.
Before DAVIS, C.J., and BURKE* , FOX, KAUTZ, and BOOMGAARDEN, JJ.
[¶1] Appellant Matthew T. Jacobson (Father) appeals from the district court’s order denying his petition to modify the order granting Appellee Aimee V. Kidd (Mother) primary custody of their children. Father claims the district court abused its discretion by concluding he had not shown a material change in circumstances to warrant modification of the order. Mother did not file a brief on appeal.1
[¶2] We reverse and remand.
[¶3] The dispositive issue in this case is: Did the district court abuse its discretion by concluding that Father had not demonstrated a material change in circumstances to justify re-opening the custody and visitation order?
[¶4] Mother and Father married in 2007, and two daughters were born to them – MJ in 2007 and KJ in 2008. Mother already had two sons from a prior marriage to Chris Jones – CJ and ZJ. Mother and Father divorced in 2009, and the district court awarded Mother primary physical custody of the girls. Father was awarded visitation in a complicated order organized around his work schedule, but generally included visitation from Thursday at noon until Sunday at 4:00 p.m. on alternating weeks. Also, during the "off week" (when Father did not have the girls from Thursday to Sunday), Father was entitled to one overnight visitation. The order included a holiday visitation schedule and a summer visitation schedule which allowed longer consecutive periods of visitation as the girls got older. In addition, the order stated that "[e]ach party shall have the right of first refusal for watching the children when the other parent is in need of child care for a period of more than two (2) consecutive hours."
[¶5] On August 15, 2011, Father filed a petition to modify the divorce decree to give him sole custody of the girls. He alleged:
[¶6] The parties reached a settlement during a September 22, 2011 hearing on Father’s modification petition. For reasons not evident in the record, an order on the settlement agreement was not entered for eight and one-half months. On June 5, 2012, the district court entered a stipulated and modified decree of divorce. The order continued the provisions of the original decree not modified, including that Mother was the primary custodian, but contained the following changes:
[¶7] On September 29, 2015, Father filed the current petition to modify custody, visitation and child support, requesting primary custody of the girls. He asserted that there had been a material change in circumstances since the 2012 modification because Mother had attempted suicide for a second time and she was "unstable and unfit to have primary custody of the children." On January 8, 2016, Father filed a motion to show cause as to why Mother should not be held in contempt of court. He alleged Mother violated the terms of the modified decree in numerous instances.
[¶8] The district court held an evidentiary hearing on Father’s modification petition and motion to show cause on May 9-10, 2017. At the hearing, evidence was presented showing the following incidents involving Mother:
, and I believe he had some narcotics on board as well." She also testified that, more than once, she let Mr. Hernandez "sleep it off" on her couch. Mother, however, denied that the children were aware of "his issues."
• On February 21, 2015, the police were called to a fight at a bar in Casper. It is unclear from the record whether Mother was involved in the fight, but she was at the bar during the fight and was required to leave. An officer testified that Mother was intoxicated and, had she not taken a taxi home, "she probably would have wound up going to jail for public intoxication."
• On September 7, 2015, another of Mother’s ex-boyfriends, Christopher Edmonds, called the police to report that Mother came to his house unannounced. She drank "a few beers" and tried to get in bed with him. He got out of bed and told her to go home. He stated that Mother then locked herself in the bathroom, where later he found her lying on the floor with an empty bottle of hydrocodone nearby. When the police arrived, Mother and Mr. Edmonds were sitting on the couch. She denied taking the pills and stated she was just "trying to coerce Mr. Edmonds into showing her love and give her affection." Mother was arrested for interference with a peace officer because she gave the officer false information about her name, date of birth and telephone number.
• On October 10, 2015, Father enrolled the girls in counseling. When Mother found out, she called the counselor and said she was the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ianelli v. Camino
...to be considered material and justify reopening the decree, the change in circumstances must affect the welfare of the children." Jacobson v. Kidd , 2018 WY 108, ¶ 17, 426 P.3d 813, 821 (Wyo. 2018) (citing Hanson v. Belveal , 2012 WY 98, ¶ 34, 280 P.3d 1186, 1197 (Wyo. 2012) ; Kappen v. Kap......
-
Martin v. Hart
...our consistent principle that in custody matters, the welfare and needs of the children are to be given paramount consideration." Jacobson v. Kidd , 2018 WY 108, ¶ 14, 426 P.3d 813, 820 (Wyo. 2018) (quoting Meehan-Greer v. Greer , 2018 WY 39, ¶ 14, 415 P.3d 274, 278 (Wyo. 2018) ). We will n......
-
Kimzey v. Kimzey
...WY 23, ¶ 8, 318 P.3d 802, 805-06 (Wyo. 2014) (quoting Bingham v. Bingham, 2007 WY 145, ¶ 10, 167 P.3d 14, 17–18 (Wyo. 2007) ). Jacobson v. Kidd, 2018 WY 108, ¶ 14, 426 P.3d 813, 820 (Wyo. 2018) (quoting Meehan-Greer v. Greer, 2018 WY 39, ¶ 14, 415 P.3d 274, 278-79 (Wyo. 2018) (other citatio......
-
Taulo-Millar v. Hognason
...unless it acts in a manner which exceeds the bounds of reason under the circumstances.’ " (quoting Jacobson v. Kidd , 2018 WY 108, ¶ 14, 426 P.3d 813, 820 (Wyo. 2018) (other citations omitted)). [¶15] Our review of the reasonableness of a district court's custody and visitation orders " ‘en......