In re Marriage Cases

Decision Date15 May 2008
Docket NumberNo. S147999.,S147999.
Citation76 Cal.Rptr.3d 683,183 P.3d 384,43 Cal.4th 757
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
PartiesIn re MARRIAGE CASES. [Six consolidated appeals.]<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL>

To continue reading

Request your trial
145 cases
  • People v. Douglas
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 3 Mayo 2018
    ...... so-called "mixed motive" or "dual motive" analysis, which arose in employment discrimination cases as a way for defendant-employers to show that they would have taken an adverse action against a ...744, 133 S.Ct. 2675, 186 L.Ed.2d 808, which held that the Defense of Marriage Act's definition of marriage as excluding same-sex partners violated equal protection and due ......
  • Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • 27 Noviembre 2017
    ...some cases raising federal and state equal protection challenges may require a bifurcated analysis (see, e.g., In reMarriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757, 843–844, 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 683, 183 P.3d 384 ), Gerawan argues, and we agree, that the federal and state standards operate the same way here......
  • People v. Jackson
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals
    • 23 Febrero 2021
    ......It provides in part: "This section shall not apply to cases in which sentencing occurs pursuant to Section 1170.12, subdivisions (b) to (i), inclusive, of ...statute from any meaningful equal protection review." ( In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757, 831, fn. 54, 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 683, 183 P.3d 384 ; see Shay, Similarly ......
  • People v. Contreras, S224564
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • 26 Febrero 2018
    ...compelling one that justifies the disparate treatment prescribed by the statute in question. [Citation.]" ( In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757, 847, 76 Cal.Rptr.3d 683, 183 P.3d 384.) And "the state must demonstrate that the distinctions drawn by the statute (or statutory scheme) ar......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 books & journal articles
  • JUDICIAL MORAL PROPHECY.
    • United States
    • Washington University Law Review Vol. 101 No. 1, August 2023
    • 1 Agosto 2023
    ...that judicial opinions upholding same-sex-marriage bans "will not stand the test of time" due to their "inhuman[ity]"), rev'd in part, 183 P.3d 384 (Cal. 2008); Hernandez v. Robles, 855 N.E.2d 1, 34 (N.Y. 2006) (Kaye, C.J., dissenting) ("I am confident that future generations will look back......
  • The Court of Appeals's decision in Godfrey v. Spano: a troubling exercise of indecision.
    • United States
    • Albany Law Review Vol. 73 No. 3, March 2010
    • 22 Marzo 2010
    ...Kerrigan v. Comm'r of Pub. Health, 957 A.2d 407, 412 (Conn. 2008) (striking down same-sex marriage ban); see also In re Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384, 399 (Cal. 2008) (striking down same-sex marriage ban), superseded by Strauss v. Horton, 207 P.3d 48, 59 (Cal. 2009) (upholding Proposition 8,......
  • The evolution toward judicial independence in the continuing quest for LGBT equality.
    • United States
    • Case Western Reserve Law Review Vol. 64 No. 3, March - March 2014
    • 22 Marzo 2014
    ...(Alexander Hamilton). (285.) See Goodridge v. Dep't of Pub. Health, 798 N.E.2d 941, 948-49 (Mass. 2003). (286.) See In re Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384 (Cal. (287.) See Kerrigan v. Comm'r of Pub. Health, 957 A.2d 407 (Conn. 2008). (288.) See Varnum v. Brien, 763 N.W.2d 862 (Iowa 2009). (289.......
  • Theorizing and litigating the rights of sexual minorities.
    • United States
    • Columbia Journal of Gender and Law Vol. 19 No. 1, January - January 2010
    • 1 Enero 2010
    ...Profiles, http://www.gladtesting.org/work/cases/ kerrigan-mock-v-connecticut-dept-of-public-health/ (last visited Feb. 1, 2010). (58) 183 P.3d 384 (2008). The court The named same-sex couples who are parties to these actions embody a diverse group of individuals who range from 30 years of a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 provisions
  • Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 22, § 50961 Estate Claims
    • United States
    • California Code Of Regulations 2023 Edition Title 22. Social Security Division 3. Health Care Services Subdivision 1. California Medical Assistance Program Chapter 2.5. Third Party Liability Article 2. Estate Recovery
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...for Nursing Home Reform v. Bontá (2003) 106 Cal. App. 4th 498; Shewry v. Begil (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 639; In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757; Perry v. Brown (9th Cir. 2013) 725 F.3d 1140; Section 2602(f) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, (Pub. L. No. 111-1......
  • Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 22, § 50962 Notification
    • United States
    • California Code Of Regulations 2023 Edition Title 22. Social Security Division 3. Health Care Services Subdivision 1. California Medical Assistance Program Chapter 2.5. Third Party Liability Article 2. Estate Recovery
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...and 19202, Probate Code; California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Bontá (2003) 106 Cal. App. 4th 498; In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757; Perry v. Brown (9th Cir. 2013) 725 F.3d 1140; Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013) 570 U.S. 12-144; and United States v. Windsor (2013) 570 U.S. ...
  • Cal. Code Regs. Tit. 22, § 50963 Substantial Hardship Criteria
    • United States
    • California Code Of Regulations 2023 Edition Title 22. Social Security Division 3. Health Care Services Subdivision 1. California Medical Assistance Program Chapter 2.5. Third Party Liability Article 2. Estate Recovery
    • 1 Enero 2023
    ...No. 65 § 3810; California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform v. Bontá (2003) 106 Cal. App. 4th 498; In re Marriage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757; Perry v. Brown (9th Cir. 2013) 725 F.3d 1140; Hollingsworth v. Perry (2013) 570 U.S. 12-144; and United States v. Windsor (2013) 570 U.S. ...
  • California Register, 2014, Number 37. September 12, 2014
    • United States
    • California Register
    • Invalid date
    ...for Nursing Home Reform v. Bonta (2003) 106 Cal. App. 4th 498; Shewry v. Begil (2005) 128 Cal.App.4th 639; In re Mar- riage Cases (2008) 43 Cal.4th 757; Perry v. Brown (9th Cir. 2013) 725 F.3d 1140; Section 2602(f) of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, (Pub. No. 111–148......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT