Tucker v. Hester, 94-6326

• Citation: 43 F.3d 1468
• Decision Date: 18 October 1994
• Docket Number: No. 94-6326,94-6326
• Parties: NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant, v. Sergeant HESTER; Mr. Herron, Major, Hoke Correctional Center; W. Shields, Superintendent, Hoke Correctional Center; L. C. Phillips, Director, Ncdop, Defendants Appellees. . Submitted:
• Court: United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)

Page 1468

43 F.3d 1468

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant, v. Sergeant HESTER; Mr. Herron, Major, Hoke Correctional

Center; W. Shields, Superintendent, Hoke

Correctional Center; L. C. Phillips,

Director, Ncdop, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6326.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: October 18, 1994

Decided: November 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-93-501-5-H)

Cornelius Tucker, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Hester, No. CA-93-501-5-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED