Babcock & Wilcox Company v. Combustion Engineering, Inc.
| Decision Date | 21 November 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 263,Docket 32974.,263 |
| Citation | 430 F.2d 1177 |
| Parties | The BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, Assignee of the Interference Parties Rothemund and Koch, Appellee, v. COMBUSTION ENGINEERING, INC., Assignee of the Interference Parties Powell, Schroedter, Clayton and Knust, Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit |
Arthur S. Tenser, New York City (Brumbaugh, Graves, Donohue & Raymond, New York City, Ralph G. Elliot, Alcorn, Bakewell & Smith, Hartford, Conn., on the brief), for appellant.
Roland T. Bryan, Stamford, Conn. (Haynes N. Johnson, Robertson, Bryan, Parmelee & Johnson, Stamford, Conn., Joseph M. Maguire, New York City, on the brief), for appellee.
Before KAUFMAN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and TENNEY, District Judge.*
We affirmed in open court1 the decision of the District Court on the opinion of Judge Zampano, reported at 314 F. Supp. 235 (D.Conn.1968).
* Of the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation.
1 On November 21, 1968.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Frilette v. Kimberlin
...also Ochsner v. Millis, 382 F.2d 618 (6th Cir. 1967).8 Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir. 1968).9 Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 430 F.2d 1177 (2d Cir. 1968), affirming per curiam 314 F.Supp. 235 (D.Conn.1968).10 Lomex v. Kihara, 175 U.S.P.Q. 538 (D.C.D.C.1972).1......
-
Brown v. Braddick
...by BI discovery rules and rules of admissibility. 8 See, e. g., In re Natta,388 F.2d 215 (CA3, 1968); Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Combustion Eng'r, Inc.,430 F.2d 1177 (CA2, 1968), Aff'g mem. 314 F.Supp. 235 (D.Conn.); Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (CA10, 1968); Natta v. Zletz, 379 F.2d 615 (CA7,......
-
Shattuck v. Hoegl
... ... Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 314 ... ...
-
Sheehan v. Doyle, No. 74-1318
...and in particular the production of documents from a party by means of a Rule 34 motion. See, e. g., Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. Combustion Engineering, Inc., 430 F.2d 1177 (2d Cir. 1968), aff'g mem. 314 F.Supp. 235 (D.Conn.1968); In re Natta, 388 F.2d 215 (3d Cir. 1968); Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.......