Galiher v. Johnson
Citation | 432 P.3d 502 |
Decision Date | 31 December 2018 |
Docket Number | S-18-0116 |
Parties | Louise J. GALIHER, Trustee of the Louise J. Galiher Trust, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. Dennis and Vicki JOHNSON, Appellees (Defendants). |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Wyoming |
Representing Appellant: Anna Reeves Olson of Park Street Law Office, Casper, Wyoming.
Representing Appellees: Matthew E. Turner of Mullikin, Larson & Swift, LLC, Jackson, Wyoming.
Before DAVIS, C.J., and BURKE* , FOX, KAUTZ, and BOOMGAARDEN, JJ.
[¶1] This case is before the Court for a second time and involves a property dispute between Louise J. Galiher and her neighbors, Dennis and Vicki Johnson (hereinafter the Johnsons or Mr. Johnson). Following a bench trial, the district court entered a judgment vesting title to a portion of Ms. Galiher’s property in the Johnsons by adverse possession. Ms. Galiher appealed that decision, and this Court reversed and remanded for the district court to consider the totality of the evidence, including statements Mr. Johnson made claiming he had permission to use the property. On remand, the district court again concluded title to the disputed property had vested in the Johnsons. Ms. Galiher appeals that judgment, arguing the district court’s findings of fact were clearly erroneous, and the facts presented did not support a finding of adverse possession. We affirm.
[¶2] Ms. Galiher raises three issues in this appeal:
[¶3] In Galiher v. Johnson , 2017 WY 31, 391 P.3d 1101 (Wyo. 2017) ( Galiher I ), we engaged in a thorough discussion of the relevant evidence provided during the bench trial in this matter. For consistency’s sake, we repeat those facts here:
Galiher I , ¶¶ 4-17, 391 P.3d at 1102-06.
[¶4] Ms. Galiher appealed the decision, and this Court concluded the district court erred when it refused to consider Mr. Johnson’s statements that he had permission from Ms. Galiher’s predecessors to use the property. Id ., ¶ 30, 391 P.3d at 1107-08. Consequently, we reversed and remanded so the district court could "consider the statements together with the other testimony and evidence in the record." Id .
[¶5] On remand the parties agreed that no additional testimony or evidence was necessary. They submitted further briefing and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mantle v. N. Star Energy & Constr. LLC
...are unsupported by the record or erroneous as a matter of law. The district court’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo . Galiher v. Johnson , 2018 WY 145, ¶ 6, 432 P.3d 502, 507 (Wyo. 2018) (quoting Graybill v. Lampman , 2014 WY 100, ¶ 25, 332 P.3d 511, 519 (Wyo. 2014) ).B. We examine ......
-
State v. Gallaga (In re U.S. Currency Totaling $75,000.00)
...factual findings "'are not entitled to the limited review afforded a jury verdict.'" Galiher v. Johnson, 2018 WY 145, ¶ 6, 432 P.3d 502, 507 (Wyo. 2018) Graybill v. Lampman, 2014 WY 100, ¶ 25, 332 P.3d 511, 519 (Wyo. 2014), and Helm v. Clark, 2010 WY 168, ¶ 6, 244 P.3d 1052, 1056 (Wyo. 2010......
-
O'Hare v. Hulme
...(citing Gray v. Fitzhugh , 576 P.2d 88, 90-91 (Wyo. 1978) ); see also Little Medicine , 2019 WY 103, ¶ 22, 450 P.3d at 229 ; Galiher v. Johnson , 2018 WY 145, ¶¶ 21-22, 432 P.3d 502, 512 (Wyo. 2018) ( Galiher II ). We have also described "the special relationship that often exists between n......
-
Woodward v. Valvoda
...because they were uncertain as to the exact location of the property lines." "Permission is an act of commission, not omission." Galiher v. Johnson , 2018 WY 145, ¶ 13, 432 P.3d 502, 510 (Wyo. 2018) (quoting Brennan v. Manchester Crossings, Inc. , 708 A.2d 815, 823 (Pa. Super. 1998) ). "[A ......