Sinclair v. Henderson, 30025 Summary Calendar.

Decision Date17 November 1970
Docket NumberNo. 30025 Summary Calendar.,30025 Summary Calendar.
Citation435 F.2d 125
PartiesBilly Wayne SINCLAIR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Respondent-Appellee.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Billy W. Sinclair, pro se.

Jack P. F. Gremillion, Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., for appellee.

Before THORNBERRY, MORGAN and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Billy Wayne Sinclair filed a petition in the nature of a civil rights action in the district court which was denied without an evidentiary hearing or a response by the defendant.1 We vacate the judgment below and remand the case for reconsideration on the merits.

Sinclair is an inmate on "Death Row" at the Louisiana State Penitentiary. The gravamen of his complaint is that the conditions maintained on "Death Row" are violative of the Eighth Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. In support of his contention appellant alleges that an inmate on Death Row "is only allowed out of his cell fifteen minutes each day during which time he must shave, bathe, wash his clothing, and get what little physical exercise he can. He is never outside the immediate vicinity of his death cell thus he is denied sunshine and exercise." He avers that he has sustained physical illnesses, as well as pain and suffering, from this treatment.

Appellant further complains that:

"The men must live and eat in a cell where his toilet facilities are located in which many leak and some are constantly bubbling over. The men must drink water that is loaded with rust and it stains everything it touches. Regardless of how much a man cleans and disinfects his cell, he still comes in contact with excessive amounts of bacteria. The men are fed from a food cart that is usually filthy and numerous times insects, roaches, or human hair is found in his food and many times the trays he must eat out of are stained with two or three day old grease. Several months past hundreds of small roaches were found nesting in the same bread box from which the men are served because these bread boxes are used week after week thus creating a haven for roaches."

The district court peremptorily denied relief on the ground that the appellant had failed to exhaust his available state remedies. This was error.

Since this is a petition in the nature of a civil rights complaint rather than a petition for habeas corpus relief challenging the legality of appellant's conviction, a federal court's assumption of jurisdiction over the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Gray v. Creamer
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • August 14, 1972
    ...Royster, 333 F.Supp. 621, 651-656 (E.D.Va.1971); Sinclair v. Henderson, 331 F.Supp. 1123 (E.D.La.1971), on hearing after remand, 435 F.2d 125 (5th Cir. 1970); Clutchette v. Procunier, 328 F.Supp. 767 (N.D.Cal.1971); Bundy v. Cannon, 328 F.Supp. 165 (D.Md.1971); Rhem v. McGrath, 326 F.Supp. ......
  • Newman v. State of Ala.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • November 8, 1974
    ...been sedulously mindful of its circumscribed role, see, e.g., Campbell v. Beto, 460 F.2d 765, 767 (5th Cir. 1972); Sinclair v. Henderson, 435 F.2d 125, 126 (5th Cir. 1970); Schack v. State of Florida,391 F.2d 593, 594 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 392 U.S. 916, 88 S.Ct. 2080, 20 L.Ed.2d 1376 (1......
  • Gates v. Collier
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • September 20, 1974
    ...661 (5th Cir. 1971); Rocha v. Sowers, 454 F.2d 1155 (5th Cir. 1972); Woolsey v. Beto, 450 F.2d 321 (5th Cir. 1971); Sinclair v. Henderson, 435 F.2d 125 (5th Cir. 1970). Although the prison officials possess broad discretion in the area of conditions of confinement, this Court has repeatedly......
  • Williams v. Treen
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • March 31, 1982
    ...opinion which suggests that conditions such as those at Angola might violate the constitutional rights of inmates. In Sinclair v. Henderson, 435 F.2d 125 (5th Cir. 1970), an inmate at the Louisiana State Penitentiary alleged that the conditions of his confinement were so unsafe and unsanita......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT