438 U.S. 781 (1978), 77-1107, Alabama v. Pugh
| Docket Nº: | No. 77-1107 |
| Citation: | 438 U.S. 781, 98 S.Ct. 3057, 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 |
| Party Name: | Alabama v. Pugh |
| Case Date: | July 03, 1978 |
| Court: | United States Supreme Court |
Page 781
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Syllabus
In respondent present and former prison inmates' suit against petitioners (the State of Alabama, the Alabama Board of Corrections, and several prison officials), the District Court issued an injunction prescribing measures to eradicate cruel and unusual punishment in the Alabama prison system. The Court of Appeals affirmed with some modifications.
Held: The District Court's injunction, insofar as it was issued against the State and the Board of Corrections, violates the State's Eleventh Amendment immunity absent the State's consent to suit.
Certiorari granted; 559 F.2d 283, reversed in part and remanded.
Per curiam opinion.
PER CURIAM.
Respondents, inmates or former inmates of the Alabama prison system, sued petitioners, who include the State of Alabama and the Alabama Board of Corrections as well as a number of Alabama officials responsible for the administration of its prisons, alleging that conditions in Alabama prisons constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The United States District Court agreed, and issued an order prescribing measures designed to eradicate cruel and unusual punishment in the Alabama prison system. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed, but modified some aspects of the order which it believed exceeded the limits of the appropriate exercise of the court's remedial powers. 559 F.2d 283.
Among the claims raised here by petitioners is that the issuance of a mandatory injunction against the State of Alabama and the Alabama Board of Corrections is unconstitutional because the Eleventh Amendment prohibits federal courts from entertaining suits by private parties against States and their agencies. The Court of Appeals did not address this contention, perhaps because it was of the view that, in light of
Page 782
the numerous individual defendants in the case, dismissal as to these two defendants would not affect the scope of the injunction. There can be no doubt, however, that suit against the State and its Board of Corrections is barred by the Eleventh Amendment, unless Alabama has consented to the filing of such a suit. Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974); Ford Motor Co. v. Department of Treasury, 323 U.S. 459 (1945); [98 S.Ct. 30...
To continue reading
FREE SIGN UP
-
249 F.R.D. 334 (N.D.Cal. 2008), C 06-5125 SBA, Californians for Disability Rights, Inc. v. California Dept. of Transp.
...Department of Health v. Florida Nursing Home Assn., 450 U.S. 147, 101 S.Ct. 1032, 67 L.Ed.2d 132 (1981) (per curiam); Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 98 S.Ct. 3057, 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1978) (per curiam). Thus, Caltrans enjoys 11th Amendment protection unless a statute unequivocally abrogates s......
-
318 F.R.D. 652 (N.D.Ala. 2016), C. A. 2:14cv601-MHT, Dunn v. Dunn
...v. McIntosh, 722 F.3d 1294, 1299 n.2 (11th Cir. 2013) (citation omitted); see also Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 782, 98 S.Ct. 3057, 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1978) (same). Therefore, the parties have stipulated that " without the necessity of a separate amendment to t......
-
617 F.Supp. 809 (E.D.Mich. 1985), 85-CV-60089, Karmanos v. Baker
...Marwil v. Board of Regents, Civil Action No. 79-7331 (E.D.Mich., July 3, 1980), and as such, they are immune from suit. Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 782, 98 S.Ct. 3057, 3057, 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1978). Plaintiffs have not alleged that the State of Michigan has consented to suit, and I hold t......
-
927 F.Supp. 977 (W.D.Tex. 1996), C. A. SA-95-CA-699, Ta v. Neimes
...have considered the merits of claims not barred by the Eleventh Amendment even when barred claims were present, citing Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 782, 98 S.Ct. 3057, 3057-58, 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1978), and Roberts v. College of the Desert, 870 F.2d 1411, 1415 (9th Cir. 1988). In addition, ......
-
249 F.R.D. 334 (N.D.Cal. 2008), C 06-5125 SBA, Californians for Disability Rights, Inc. v. California Dept. of Transp.
...Department of Health v. Florida Nursing Home Assn., 450 U.S. 147, 101 S.Ct. 1032, 67 L.Ed.2d 132 (1981) (per curiam); Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 98 S.Ct. 3057, 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1978) (per curiam). Thus, Caltrans enjoys 11th Amendment protection unless a statute unequivocally abrogates s......
-
318 F.R.D. 652 (N.D.Ala. 2016), C. A. 2:14cv601-MHT, Dunn v. Dunn
...v. McIntosh, 722 F.3d 1294, 1299 n.2 (11th Cir. 2013) (citation omitted); see also Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 782, 98 S.Ct. 3057, 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1978) (same). Therefore, the parties have stipulated that " without the necessity of a separate amendment to t......
-
617 F.Supp. 809 (E.D.Mich. 1985), 85-CV-60089, Karmanos v. Baker
...Marwil v. Board of Regents, Civil Action No. 79-7331 (E.D.Mich., July 3, 1980), and as such, they are immune from suit. Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 782, 98 S.Ct. 3057, 3057, 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1978). Plaintiffs have not alleged that the State of Michigan has consented to suit, and I hold t......
-
927 F.Supp. 977 (W.D.Tex. 1996), C. A. SA-95-CA-699, Ta v. Neimes
...have considered the merits of claims not barred by the Eleventh Amendment even when barred claims were present, citing Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781, 782, 98 S.Ct. 3057, 3057-58, 57 L.Ed.2d 1114 (1978), and Roberts v. College of the Desert, 870 F.2d 1411, 1415 (9th Cir. 1988). In addition, ......
-
Recasting prosecutorial discretion.
...318 (M.D. Ala. 1976), aff'd sub nom. Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 (5th Cir. 1977), rev'd in part and remanded sub nom. Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781 (1978); Palmigiano v. Garrahy, 443 F. Supp. 956 (D.R.I. 1977). See also Michael B. Mushlin, Rights of Prisoners [sections] 2.14 (2d ed. 199......
-
EXPERIMENTAL PUNISHMENTS.
...think is needed lo avoid mental, physical, and emotional deterioration."), rev'd in part on other grounds sub nom. Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781 (1978) (per curiam). See generally Haney & Lynch, supra note 143. al 543-44. (222) 384 F.2d 307, 307-08 (10th Cir. 1907) (per curiam). (2......
-
A farewell to harms: against presuming irreparable injury in constitutional litigation.
...might like to see accomplished in the way of ideal prison conditions."), rev'd in part on other grounds sub nom. Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 782 (1978). (119.) Dickerson v. United States, 530 U.S. 428, 446, 461, 465 (2000) (Scalia, J., dissenting) (criticizing the use of any form of cons......
-
Reforming Labor Law by Reforming Labor Law Preemption Doctrine to Allow the States to Make More Labor Relations Policy
...Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006). Different standards are, however, applied to public employee free speech. Id. [51] E.g., Alabama v. Pugh, 438 U.S. 781 (1978) (state official but not the state may be sued under Section 1983). [52] National Labor Relations Act § 10, 29 U.S.C. § 160 (2006). [53......