44 Ala. 287 (Ala. 1870), Talladega Ins. Co. v. Woodward

Citation44 Ala. 287
Opinion JudgeB. F. SAFFOLD, J.
Party NameTALLADEGA INSURANCE COMPANY v. WOODWARD.
AttorneyJOHN T. HEFLIN, for appellant. J. A. WOODWARD, pro se.
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

Page 287

44 Ala. 287 (Ala. 1870)

TALLADEGA INSURANCE COMPANY

v.

WOODWARD.

Supreme Court of Alabama

January Term, 1870

[ACTION ON CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT.]

APPEAL from the Circuit Court of Talladega.

Tried before Hon. JOHN HENDERSON.

JOHN T. HEFLIN, for appellant.

J. A. WOODWARD, pro se.

B. F. SAFFOLD, J.

This suit was brought by the appellee against the appellant. The plaintiff claimed of the defendant a specified sum of money as due on a writing as follows: "$3,900. Talladega Insurance Company, Talladega, Alabama, January 13, 1862. Mr. James A. Woodward has deposited in this office, with interest, thirty-nine hundred dollars to the credit of himself, payable on the return of this certificate, properly endorsed. James G. L. Huey, secretary."

The service of the summons was effected thus: "The defendant, its secretary and managing agent, hereby acknowledges legal service of the within summons and complaint, and waives copy; also waives entry on appearance docket at spring term, 1866. April 17, 1866. James G. L. Huey, secretary." The judgment was by default, and recites that service was "proven to the satisfaction of the court."

The objections of the appellant may be embraced in two propositions: 1. The record does not show service of process on the defendant. 2. The cause of action did not authorize a judgment by default and without a writ of inquiry.

When process against a corporation is executed by the sheriff on one of its officers or agents, proof is necessary that the person served is an officer or agent upon whom it may be served.-- Cole v. Wetumpka and C. R. R. Co., 6 Ala. 655; Lyon v. Lorant, 3 Ala. 151. A summons to a corporation may be executed by the delivery of a copy of the summons and complaint to the president, or other head thereof, secretary, cashier or managing agent thereof.--Revised Code, § 2568. Acceptance of service of summons is usually an acknowledgment in writing of notice of the suit, and of the delivery of a copy of the summons and complaint. Can the president or other officer or agent above mentioned accept service? The service upon him, though on account of his connection with the corporation, is, nevertheless, a personal act. It is notice to an individual of a proceeding against the body he represents, and his acceptance of service is nothing more than his declaration in writing that he has received such notice. Any one on whom service may be executed, may acknowledge that he...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 practice notes
  • 62 S.W. 815 (Tex.Civ.App. 1901), Fox v. Robbins
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
    • March 27, 1901
    ...may legally be served is competent to accept service for the corporation. 19 Enc. Pl. & Prac. 670; Insurance Co. v. Woodward, 44 Ala. 287. We, therefore, conclude that such acceptance of service was apparently valid, and prima facie conferred jurisdiction to render judgment against the ......
  • 139 S.W. 487 (Mo.App. 1911), In re Estate of offutt
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • July 15, 1911
    ...Bank v. Brown, 45 Oh. St. 39; Zane on Banks and Banking, sec. 161; Frank v. Wessels, 64 N.Y. 155; Talladega Ins. Co. v. Woodward, 44 Ala. 287; Baker v. Leland, 9 App.Div. (N. Y.) 365; Hunt v. Devine, 37 Ill. 137. (3) Deposit of moneys in bank subject to withdrawal only after notice for a sp......
  • 223 P. 1091 (Kan. 1923), 24,724, Barrett v. Foster
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • December 8, 1923
    ...303 Ill. 282, 135 N.E. 497; Pierce v. State National Bank of Boston, 215 Mass. 18, 101 N.E. 1060; Talladega Insurance Co. v. Woodward, 44 Ala. 287; Hillsinger v. Georgia Railroad Bank, 108 Ga. 357, 33 S.E. 985; Elliott v. State Bank, 128 Iowa 275, 103 N.W. 777; Easley v. East Tennessee Nat.......
  • 75 S.W. 271 (Ky.App. 1903), Dietrich v. Rothenberger
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Kentucky
    • June 17, 1903
    ...of deposit payable to order." To same effect, see Bank of Peru v. Farnsworth, 18 Ill. 563; Talladega Insurance Company v. Woodward, 44 Ala. 287; Poorman v. Mills, 35 Cal. 118, 95 Am.Dec. 90; Gregg v. Union County National Bank, 87 Ind. 238; Bean v. Briggs, 1 Iowa, 488, 63 Am.Dec. 464; ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • 62 S.W. 815 (Tex.Civ.App. 1901), Fox v. Robbins
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
    • March 27, 1901
    ...may legally be served is competent to accept service for the corporation. 19 Enc. Pl. & Prac. 670; Insurance Co. v. Woodward, 44 Ala. 287. We, therefore, conclude that such acceptance of service was apparently valid, and prima facie conferred jurisdiction to render judgment against the ......
  • 139 S.W. 487 (Mo.App. 1911), In re Estate of offutt
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • July 15, 1911
    ...Bank v. Brown, 45 Oh. St. 39; Zane on Banks and Banking, sec. 161; Frank v. Wessels, 64 N.Y. 155; Talladega Ins. Co. v. Woodward, 44 Ala. 287; Baker v. Leland, 9 App.Div. (N. Y.) 365; Hunt v. Devine, 37 Ill. 137. (3) Deposit of moneys in bank subject to withdrawal only after notice for a sp......
  • 223 P. 1091 (Kan. 1923), 24,724, Barrett v. Foster
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Kansas
    • December 8, 1923
    ...303 Ill. 282, 135 N.E. 497; Pierce v. State National Bank of Boston, 215 Mass. 18, 101 N.E. 1060; Talladega Insurance Co. v. Woodward, 44 Ala. 287; Hillsinger v. Georgia Railroad Bank, 108 Ga. 357, 33 S.E. 985; Elliott v. State Bank, 128 Iowa 275, 103 N.W. 777; Easley v. East Tennessee Nat.......
  • 75 S.W. 271 (Ky.App. 1903), Dietrich v. Rothenberger
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Kentucky
    • June 17, 1903
    ...of deposit payable to order." To same effect, see Bank of Peru v. Farnsworth, 18 Ill. 563; Talladega Insurance Company v. Woodward, 44 Ala. 287; Poorman v. Mills, 35 Cal. 118, 95 Am.Dec. 90; Gregg v. Union County National Bank, 87 Ind. 238; Bean v. Briggs, 1 Iowa, 488, 63 Am.Dec. 464; ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT