Young v. Miller
Decision Date | 29 September 1896 |
Docket Number | 17,540 |
Citation | 44 N.E. 757,145 Ind. 652 |
Parties | Young et al. v. Miller et al |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
Reversed.
Brush & Snyder, Kennedy & Kennedy, and G. F. Harvey, for appellants.
Crane & Anderson, for appellees.
The appellees sued the appellants to set aside the will of Alfred D. Young, alleging that the testator was of unsound mind and that the will was unduly executed.
Upon the trial, the court charged the jury, among other propositions, as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Taylor v. McClintock
...cause of their estrangement and of his discrimination against her. The burden was on the appellee. 57 Ark. 402; 78 S.W. 398; 45 A. 727; 145 Ind. 652; 94 Md. 20. The eighth instruction is erroneous, in charging the jury that one can be entirely sound on all subjects, or as to all persons, ex......
-
Buford v. Gruber
......660; Cutler v. Zollinger, . 117 Mo. 92; Benoist v. Murrin, 58 Mo. 307; Appeal of. Kimberly, 37 L. R. A. 261, 68 Conn. 428; Young v. Miller, 145 Ind. 652; Jones v. Collins, 94 Md. 403; Lee v. Scudder, 31 N.J.Eq. 633; Mullins v. Cottrell, 41 Miss. 291; Edwards v. ......
-
Swygart v. Willard
...a will, such will would be invalid. This instruction was tacitly admitted to be correct in the case of Young et al. v. Miller et al., 145 Ind. 652, 655, 44 N. E. 757. (156, 157) It is finally insisted that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence, and is contrary to law. Appellee......
-
Roller v. Kling
...statements of the law under the decisions of this court in Blough v. Parry, 144 Ind. 463, 40 N. E. 70, and 43 N. E. 560;Young v. Miller, 145 Ind. 652, 44 N. E. 757; and Teegarden v. Lewis, 145 Ind. 98, 40 N. E. 1047, and 44 N. E. 9. If a general, instead of a special, verdict had been retur......