444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971), 21049, N. L. R. B. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.
|Citation:||444 F.2d 502|
|Party Name:||NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. OGLE PROTECTION SERVICE, INC. et al., Respondents.|
|Case Date:||June 30, 1971|
|Court:||United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit|
Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief.
Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess & Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief.
Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges.
This case is before us a second time. Almost four years ago, we enforced an order of the Board finding respondents in violation of the National Labor Rlations Act for refusing to sign a collective bargaining agreement reached between employer and union. 375 F.2d 497 (6th Cir. 1967), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 843, 88 S.Ct. 84, 19 L.Ed.2d 108 (1967). Now the Board has petitioned for enforcement of a supplemental order, reported at 183 N.L.R.B. No. 68 (1970), entered against respondents. The primary issue is the propriety of the back pay award issued by the Board.
The order of the Board which we enforced in 1967 requires respondents, inter alia, to
Upon request by International Union, United Plant Guard Workers of America, and its Local 114, execute the agreement reached on November 14, 1962, the agreement to be effective from that date to at least the next renewal date as provided therein following signature, * * *.
The contract, which could be terminated by either party at the end of the calendar year, was executed on October 27, 1967. In accordance with its previously enforced order, the Board determined that a back pay order should be entered for the period from January 1, 1963-- the day the contract was to have gone into effect-- until October 27, 1967-- the day of ratification (there would be no point in extending the order to December 31, 1967, 'the next renewal date as provided therein following signature,' because contract wages would be paid after October 27).
Our previous judgment enforcing the Board's initial order is of course res judicata, and we decline respondents' invitation to reconsider that decision. We hold that the Board's determination of the...
To continue readingFREE SIGN UP