Minebea Co., Ltd. v. Papst, Civil Action No. 97-0590 (PLF).
Decision Date | 17 August 2006 |
Docket Number | Civil Action No. 97-0590 (PLF). |
Citation | 444 F.Supp.2d 68 |
Parties | MINEBEA CO., LTD., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Georg PAPST, et al., Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of Columbia |
Marin, Schulte Roth & Zabel, LLP, New York City, for Plaintiffs.
A. Sidney Katz, Jerold B. Schnayer, R. Mark Halligan, Walter J. Kawula, Craig M. Kuchii, Daniel R. Cherry, Richard W. McLaren, Jr., Steven E. Feldman, John L. Ambrogi, Welsh & Katz, Limited, Chicago, IL, Campbell Killefer, Venable LLP, James K. Archibald, Venable LLP, Daniel Joseph, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Washington, DC, for Defendants.
OPINION, FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. U.S.
...905 F.2d at 745 ("Plaintiffs have failed to meet their burden and duty of exercising due diligence."); see generally Minebea Co. v. Papst, 444 F.Supp.2d 68, 175 (D.D.C.2006) ("Normally, a defendant asserting an affirmative defense such as the statute of limitations bears the burden of demon......
-
Static Control Components v. Lexmark Intern.
...applies to the sale of an article is whether that article was first sold in the United States or overseas. See Minebea Co. v. Papst, 444 F.Supp.2d 68, 142 (D.D.C.2006). The nature of the patented article, disposable cameras, in Jazz Photo being "of foreign provenance" merely served as proof......
-
Regnante v. Sec. & Exch. Officials
...However, the law of unjust enrichment in New York and in the District of Columbia is "substantially the same." Minebea Co. v. Papst, 444 F.Supp.2d 68, 186 n. 92 (D.D.C.2006). Given the parties' silence on the issue and the similarities between the law in New York and the District of Columbi......
-
Campbell v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA
...the existence of a contractual agreement that foreclosed an unjust enrichment claim, the claim must be dismissed); Minebea Co. v. Papst, 444 F.Supp.2d 68, 186 (D.D.C.2006) (holding that unjust enrichment claim premised on the paid-for purchase of a patent portfolio failed where all parties ......
-
The United States of America
...paid for different sets of rights under the same patents. 189. 553 U.S. 617 (2009). 190. Id. at 631-33. 191. Id. at 631-35. 192. 444 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2006). 193. Id. at 210-13, 215-16, 219-20. 40 Antitrust Issues in International IP Licensing Transactions Minebea paid a royalty “to di......
-
Experts
...66-67 (1st Cir. 2002) (in antitrust action, listing professional soccer leagues from numerous countries); Minebea Co., Ltd. v. Papst, 444 F. Supp. 2d 68, 145 (D.D.C. 2006) (in complex patent bench trial, charts showing customers and computer hard disc drives by motor projects and manufactur......
-
Table of Cases
...Jan. 6, 2014), 115 Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. N. River Ins. Co., 73 F. Supp. 3d 544 (W.D. Pa. 2014), 122 Minebea Co., Ltd. v. Papst, 444 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2006), appeal dismissed based on dismissal agreement, 224 F. App’x 962 (Fed. Cir. 2007), 227 Missouri v. W.E.R. (In re Grand Jur......
-
Table of cases
...Eng’g, 95 F.3d 1109 (Fed. Cir. 1996) ............................................................... 20 Minebea Co. v. Pabst, 444 F. Supp. 2d 68 (D.D.C. 2006) .................................................. 39, 40 Möbelwachspaste, BGH, Mar. 15, 1955, 1955 GRUR 424 .............................