448 F.2d 1240 (4th Cir. 1971), 71-1412, Shaw v. United States

Docket Nº:71-1412.
Citation:448 F.2d 1240
Party Name:John G. SHAW, Administrator of the Estate of Phillip G. Steele, Deceased, Appellant v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Case Date:October 07, 1971
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 1240

448 F.2d 1240 (4th Cir. 1971)

John G. SHAW, Administrator of the Estate of Phillip G. Steele, Deceased, Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 71-1412.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Oct 7, 1971

Page 1241

James C. MacRae, on the brief, for appellant.

L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Warren H. Coolidge, U. S. Atty., Morton Hollander, and Robert M. Feinson, Attys., Dept. of Justice, on the brief, for appellee.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and SOBELOFF and BOREMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff-Appellant brought suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment for the United States, and the plaintiff appeals from that order.

The decedent, Phillip B. Steele, a private in the United States Army, was confined, at the time of his death, in the post stockade at Fort Bragg, North Carolina, following his conviction by a special court martial for being absent without leave. On May 5, 1969, Private Steele and four other soldiers who were also confined in the post stockade were ordered by a sergeant to remove paint from the floor of a building with gasoline and an electric buffer. The gasoline caught fire and Private Steele was severely burned. He died two days later.

In Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950) it was held that:

* * * the Government is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act for injuries to servicemen where the injuries arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service.

Appellant contends that since Private Steele was a military prisoner, he was not on military duty and hence Feres is not applicable. We find this contention to be without merit.

The court in Feres reasoned that since Congress had provided a uniform system of compensation for the injury or death of those in the armed forces and in view of the unique relationship of military personnel to their superiors and the Government, injuries to military personnel incurred while on military duty were not actionable under the Federal Tort Claims Act. See also Buckingham v. United States, 394 F.2d 483 (4th Cir. 1968). An...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP