448 U.S. 448 (1980), 78-1007, Fullilove v. Klutznick

Docket Nº:No. 78-1007
Citation:448 U.S. 448, 100 S.Ct. 2758, 65 L.Ed.2d 902
Party Name:Fullilove v. Klutznick
Case Date:July 02, 1980
Court:United States Supreme Court

Page 448

448 U.S. 448 (1980)

100 S.Ct. 2758, 65 L.Ed.2d 902

Fullilove

v.

Klutznick

No. 78-1007

United States Supreme Court

July 2, 1980

Argued November 27, 1979

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

Syllabus

The "minority business enterprise" (MBE) provision of the Public Works Employment Act of 1977 (1977 Act) requires that, absent an administrative waiver, at least 10% of federal funds granted for local public works projects must be used by the state or local grantee to procure services or supplies from businesses owned by minority group members, defined as United States citizens "who are Negroes, Spanish-speaking, Orientals, Indians, Eskimos, and Aleuts." Under implementing regulations and guidelines, grantees and their private prime contractors are required, to the extent feasible, in fulfilling the 10% MBE requirement, to seek out all available, qualified, bona fide MBE's, to provide technical assistance as needed, to lower or waive bonding requirements where feasible, to solicit the aid of the Office of Minority Business Enterprise, the Small Business Administration, or other sources for assisting MBE's in obtaining required working capital, and to give guidance through the intricacies of the bidding process. The administrative program, which recognizes that contracts will be awarded to bona fide MBE's even though they are not the lowest bidders if their bids reflect merely attempts to cover costs inflated by the present effects of prior disadvantage and discrimination, provides for handling grantee applications for administrative waiver of the 10% MBE requirement on a case-by-case basis if infeasibility is demonstrated by a showing that, despite affirmative efforts, such level of participation cannot be achieved without departing from the program's objectives. The program also provides an administrative mechanism to ensure that only bona fide MBE's are encompassed by the program, and to prevent unjust participation by minority firms whose access to public contracting opportunities is not impaired by the effects of prior discrimination.

Petitioners, several associations of construction contractors and subcontractors and a firm engaged in heating, ventilation, and air conditioning work, filed suit for declaratory and injunctive relief in Federal District Court, alleging that they had sustained economic injury due to enforcement of the MBE requirement, and that the MBE provision, on its face, violated, inter alia, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth

Page 449

Amendment and the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. The District Court upheld the validity of the MBE program, and the Court of Appeals affirmed.

Held: The judgment is affirmed. Pp. 456-492; 517-522.

584 F.2d 600, affirmed.

[100 S.Ct. 2760] MR. CHIEF .JUSTICE BURGER, joined by MR. JUSTICE WHITE and MR. JUSTICE POWELL, concluded that the MBE provision of the 1977 Act, on its face, does not violate the Constitution. Pp. 456-492.

(a) Viewed against the legislative and administrative background of the 1977 Act, the legislative objectives of the MBE provision and of the administrative program thereunder were to ensure -- without mandating the allocation of federal funds according to inflexible percentages solely based on race or ethnicity -- that, to the extent federal funds were granted under the 1977 Act, grantees who elected to participate would not employ procurement practices that Congress had decided might result in perpetuation of the effects of prior discrimination which had impaired or foreclosed access by minority businesses to public contracting opportunities. Pp. 456-472.

(b) In considering the constitutionality of the MBE provision, it first must be determined whether the objectives of the legislation are within Congress' power. Pp. 472-480.

(i) The 1977 Act, as primarily an exercise of Congress' Spending Power under Art. I, § 8, cl. 1, "to provide for the . . . general Welfare," conditions receipt of federal moneys upon the receipt's compliance with federal statutory and administrative directives. Since the reach of the Spending Power is at least as broad as Congress' regulatory powers, if Congress, pursuant to its regulatory powers, could have achieved the objectives of the MBE program, then it may do so under the Spending Power. Pp. 473-475

(ii) Insofar as the MBE program pertains to the actions of private prime contractors, including those not responsible for any violation of antidiscrimination laws, Congress could have achieved its objectives under the Commerce Clause. The legislative history shows that there was a rational basis for Congress to conclude that the subcontracting practices of prime contractors could perpetuate the prevailing impaired access by minority businesses to public contracting opportunities, and that this inequity has an effect on interstate commerce. Pp. 475-476.

(iii) Insofar as the MBE program pertains to the actions of state and local grantees, Congress could have achieved its objectives by use of its power under § 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment "to enforce, by appropriate legislation" the equal protection guarantee of that Amendment. Congress had abundant historical basis from which it could conclude

Page 450

that traditional procurement practices, when applied to minority businesses, could perpetuate the effects of prior discrimination, and that the prospective elimination of such barriers to minority-firm access to public contracting opportunities was appropriate to ensure that those businesses were not denied equal opportunity to participate in federal grants to state and local governments, which is one aspect of the equal protection of the laws. Cf., e.g., Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641; Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112. Pp. 476-478.

(iv) Thus, the objectives of the MBE provision are within the scope of Congress' Spending Power. Cf. Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563. Pp. 479-480.

(c) Congress' use here of racial and ethnic criteria as a condition attached to a federal grant is a valid means to accomplish its constitutional objectives, and the MBE provision, on its face, does not violate the equal protection component of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Pp. 480-492.

(i) In the MBE program's remedial context, there is no requirement that Congress act in a wholly "color-blind" fashion. Cf., e.g., Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenberg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1; McDaniel v. Barresi, 402 U.S. 39; North Carolina Board of Education v. Swann, 402 U.S. 43. Pp. 482-484.

[100 S.Ct. 2761] (ii) The MBE program is not constitutionally defective because it may disappoint the expectations of access to a portion of government contracting opportunities of nonminority firms who may themselves be innocent of any prior discriminatory actions. When effectuating a limited and properly tailored remedy to cure the effects of prior discrimination, such "a sharing of the burden" by innocent parties is not impermissible. Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co., 424 U.S. 747, 777. Pp. 484-485.

(iii) Nor is the MBE program invalid as being underinclusive in that it limits its benefit to specified minority groups, rather than extending its remedial objectives to all businesses whose access to government contracting is impaired by the effects of disadvantage or discrimination. Congress has not sought to give select minority groups a preferred standing in the construction industry, but has embarked on a remedial program to place them on a more equitable footing with respect to public contracting opportunities, and there has been no showing that Congress inadvertently effected an invidious discrimination by excluding from coverage an identifiable minority group that has been the victim of a degree of disadvantage and discrimination equal to or greater than that suffered by the groups encompassed by the MBE program. Pp. 485-486.

Page 451

(iv) The contention that the MBE program, on its face, is overinclusive in that it bestows a benefit on businesses identified by racial or ethnic criteria which cannot be justified on the basis of competitive criteria or as a remedy for the present effects of identified prior discrimination is also without merit. The MBE provision, with due account for its administrative program, provides a reasonable assurance that application of racial or ethnic criteria will be narrowly limited to accomplishing Congress' remedial objectives, and that misapplications of the program will be promptly and adequately remedied administratively. In particular, the administrative program provides waiver and exemption procedures to identify and eliminate from participation MBE's who are not "bona fide," or who attempt to exploit the remedial aspects of the program by charging an unreasonable price not attributable to the present effects of past discrimination. Moreover, grantees may obtain a waiver if they demonstrate that their best efforts will not achieve or have not achieved the 10% target for minority firm participation within the limitations of the program's remedial objectives. The MBE provision may be viewed as a pilot project, appropriately limited in extent and duration and subject to reassessment and reevaluation by the Congress prior to any extension or reenactment. Pp. 486-489.

(d) In the continuing effort to achieve the goal of equality of economic opportunity, Congress has latitude to try new techniques such as the limited use of racial and ethnic criteria to accomplish remedial objectives, especially in programs where voluntary cooperation is induced by placing conditions on federal expenditures. When a program narrowly tailored by Congress to achieve its objectives comes under judicial review, it should be upheld if the courts are satisfied that the legislative objectives and projected administration of the program give reasonable assurance that...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP
679 practice notes
  • 497 F.Supp. 800 (S.D.N.Y. 1980), 75 Civ. 4736, Ste. Marie v. Eastern R.R. Ass'n
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 2nd Circuit
    • July 23, 1980
    ...illegal practices will not be repeated. Fullilove v. Kreps, 584 F.2d 600, 606-07 (2d Cir. 1978), aff'd sub nom. Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 100 S.Ct. 2758, 65 L.Ed.2d 902 (1980); James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 354-55 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U......
  • 671 F.2d 23 (1st Cir. 1982), 81-1561, Morgan v. O'Bryant
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
    • February 17, 1982
    ...remedies are a constitutionally valid means of ameliorating the effects of such discrimination. See, e.g., Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 477-78, 100 S.Ct. 2758, 2774, 65 L.Ed.2d 902 (1980) (Burger, C. J., announcing the judgment of the Court); id., at 517-19, 100 S.Ct. at 2794-2796 ......
  • 671 F.2d 702 (2nd Cir. 1982), 292, Hudson Valley Freedom Theater, Inc. v. Heimbach
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    • February 1, 1982
    ...claims when it alleges discrimination because of the color of its stockholders derives implicit support from Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 455, 100 S.Ct. 2758, 2763, 65 L.Ed.2d 902 (1980), which entertained, without suggesting any question of standing, a complaint of "several a......
  • 696 F.Supp. 1480 (N.D.Ga. 1987), Civ. A. C82-1895, S.J. Groves & Sons Co. v. Fulton County
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 11th Circuit Northern District of Georgia
    • March 30, 1987
    ...Public Works Employment Act (PWEA) of 1977, 42 U.S.C. § 6701 et seq. The PWEA was upheld by the Supreme Court in Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 100 S.Ct. 2758 , 65 L.Ed.2d 902 At first glance, the result in Fullilove seems to favor DOT's argument that its findings in this case w......
  • Free signup to view additional results
550 cases
  • 497 F.Supp. 800 (S.D.N.Y. 1980), 75 Civ. 4736, Ste. Marie v. Eastern R.R. Ass'n
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 2nd Circuit
    • July 23, 1980
    ...illegal practices will not be repeated. Fullilove v. Kreps, 584 F.2d 600, 606-07 (2d Cir. 1978), aff'd sub nom. Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 100 S.Ct. 2758, 65 L.Ed.2d 902 (1980); James v. Stockham Valves & Fittings Co., 559 F.2d 310, 354-55 (5th Cir. 1977), cert. denied, 434 U......
  • 671 F.2d 23 (1st Cir. 1982), 81-1561, Morgan v. O'Bryant
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
    • February 17, 1982
    ...remedies are a constitutionally valid means of ameliorating the effects of such discrimination. See, e.g., Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 477-78, 100 S.Ct. 2758, 2774, 65 L.Ed.2d 902 (1980) (Burger, C. J., announcing the judgment of the Court); id., at 517-19, 100 S.Ct. at 2794-2796 ......
  • 671 F.2d 702 (2nd Cir. 1982), 292, Hudson Valley Freedom Theater, Inc. v. Heimbach
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States Courts of Appeals Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
    • February 1, 1982
    ...claims when it alleges discrimination because of the color of its stockholders derives implicit support from Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 455, 100 S.Ct. 2758, 2763, 65 L.Ed.2d 902 (1980), which entertained, without suggesting any question of standing, a complaint of "several a......
  • 696 F.Supp. 1480 (N.D.Ga. 1987), Civ. A. C82-1895, S.J. Groves & Sons Co. v. Fulton County
    • United States
    • Federal Cases United States District Courts 11th Circuit Northern District of Georgia
    • March 30, 1987
    ...Public Works Employment Act (PWEA) of 1977, 42 U.S.C. § 6701 et seq. The PWEA was upheld by the Supreme Court in Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 100 S.Ct. 2758 , 65 L.Ed.2d 902 At first glance, the result in Fullilove seems to favor DOT's argument that its findings in this case w......
  • Free signup to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Supreme Court ruling confirming the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 28, 2010
    ...State School and Hospital v. Halderman, 451 U. S. 1, 17 (1981); South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U. S. 203, 206 (1987); Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U. S. 448, 474 (1980) (opinion of Burger, C. J.); Steward Machine, supra, at 593. C This practice of attaching conditions to federal funds —————— 8Thi......
  • Supreme Court Opinion in Fisher v. University of Texas Affirmative Action Case
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • June 24, 2013
    ...a relevant basis for disparate treatment,’” Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co., 488 U. S. 469, 505 (1989) (quoting Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U. S. 448, 533–534 (1980) (Stevens, J., dissenting)), “the Equal Protection Clause demands that racial classifications . . . be subjected to the ‘most rig......
  • Delaware Court Arbitration Proceedings Declared Unconstitutional
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • September 25, 2012
    ...tit. 10, § 346 (West). 4 Del. Code Ann. tit. 10, § 347 (West). 5 Del. H.B. No. 49, at 4 (2009). 6 Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 550, 580 (1980). 7 Publicker Indus., Inc. v. Cohen, 733 F.2d 1059, 1061 (3rd Cir. 1984). 8 Complaint, at 4, Delaware Coal. for Open Gov't v. Stri......
123 books & journal articles
  • The Activist Insecurity and the Demise of Civil Rights Law
    • United States
    • Louisiana Law Review Nbr. 63-3, April 2003
    • April 1, 2003
    ...In Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200, 115 S. Ct. 2097(1995), the Court overruled its decision in Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 100 S. Ct. 2758 (1980), which had granted Congress substantial deference in the creation or racial set asides in government spending and cont......
  • "A nation of minorities": race, ethnicity, and reactionary colorblindness.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 59 Nbr. 4, February 2007
    • February 1, 2007
    ...(Thomas, J., concurring); City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 521 (1989) (Scalia, J., concurring); Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 547 n.21 (1980) (Stevens, J., dissenting); Regents of Univ. of Cal. v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265, 295 n.35 (1978) (Powell, J.); Morris B. Abram, ......
  • Legislative record review.
    • United States
    • Stanford Law Review Vol. 54 Nbr. 1, October 2001
    • October 1, 2001
    ...236 (1995) (stating that reasons for racial classification should be "'clearly identified'") (quoting Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 535 (1980) (Stevens, J., dissenting)); City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 504 (1989) (plurality opinion) (requiring that stat......
  • The Supreme Court and the Memory of Evil.
    • United States
    • February 1, 2019
    ...(upholding, under the Commerce Clause, a federal ban on intrastate manufacture, distribution, and possession of marijuana). (341.) See 448 U.S. 448, 453-54, 478, 486, 492 (1980) (plurality opinion), abrogated in part by Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200 (342.) See id, at 522-......
  • Free signup to view additional results
1 provisions
  • Wagner-Peyser Act Staffing Flexibility
    • United States
    • Employment And Training Administration,Labor Department
    • Invalid date
    ...effects it is designed to eliminate.'' Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena, 515 U.S. 200, 238 (1995) (quoting Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 513 (1980) (Powell, J., concurring; cf. Fisher v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 2198, 2208 (2016) (``A university cannot impose a fixed quota or otherwise d......