James Wilson, Plaintiff v. Lewis Rousseau and Charles Easton

Citation45 U.S. 646,4 How. 646,11 L.Ed. 1141
PartiesJAMES G. WILSON, PLAINTIFF, v. LEWIS ROUSSEAU AND CHARLES EASTON
Decision Date01 January 1846
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

JOHN THOMAS, Justice of the Peace.'

The above documents appear to be recorded in the third volume of Transfers of Patent Rights, pages 155, 156, in the patent-office of the United States.

On the 27th of December, 1828, a patent was issued as follows.

'Letters Patent to W. Woodworth.

'The United States of America to all to whom these letters patent shall come:

'Whereas William Woodworth, a citizen of the United States, hath alleged that he has invented a new and useful improvement in the method of planing, tonguing, grooving, and cutting into mouldings, or either, plank, boards, or any other material, and for reducing the same to an equal width and thickness; and also for facing and dressing brick, and cutting mouldings on, or facing, metallic, mineral, or other substances, which improvements, he states, have not been known or used before his application; hath made oath that he does verily believe that he is the true inventer or discoverer of the said improvement; hath paid into the treasury of the United States the sum of thirty dollars, delivered a receipt for the same, and presented a petition to the Secretary of State, signifying a desire of obtaining an exclusive property in the said improvements, and praying that a patent may be granted for that purpose. These are, therefore, to grant, according to law, to the said William Woodworth, his heirs, administrators, or assigns, for the term of fourteen years from the 27th of December, 1828, the full and exclusive right and liberty of making, constructing, using, and vending to others to be used, the said improvement, a description whereof is given in the words of the said William Woodworth himself, in the schedule hereto annexed, and is made a part of these presents.

'In testimony whereof, I have caused these letters to be made patent, and the seal of the United States to be hereunto affixed. Given under my hand, at the city of Washington, this 27th day of December, in the year of our Lord 1828, and of the independence of the United States of America, the fifty-third.

(Signed,) J. Q. ADAMS

[L. S.]

'By the President.

(Signed,) H. CLAY, Secretary of State.'

Certificate of Wm. Wirt, Attorney-General of the United States.

'City of Washington, to wit:

'I do hereby certify, that the foregoing letters patent were delivered to me on the 27th day of December, in the year of our Lord 1828, to be examined; that I have examined the same, and find them conformable to law; and I do hereby return the same to the Secretary of State, within fifteen days from the date aforesaid, to wit, on this 27th day of December, in the year aforesaid.

WM. WIRT,

Attorney-General of the United States.'

Schedule.

'The schedule referred to in these letters patent, and making part of the same, containing a description, in the words of the said William Woodworth himself, of his improvement in the method of planing, tonguing, grooving, and cutting into mouldings, or either, plank, boards, or any other material, and for reducing the same to an equal width and thickness; and also for facing and dressing brick, and cutting mouldings on, or facing, metallic, mineral, or other substances.

'The plank, boards, or other material, being reduced to a width by circular saws or friction-wheels, as the case may be, is then placed on a carriage, resting on a platform, with a rotary cutting-wheel in the centre, either horizontal or vertical. The heads or circular plates, fixed to an axis, may have one of the heads movable, to accommodate any length of knife required. The knife fitted to the head with screws or bolts, or the knives or cutters for moulding fitted by screws or bolts to logs, connecting the heads of the cylinder, and forming with the edges of the knives or cutters a cylinder. The knives may be placed in a line with the axis of the cylinder, or diagonally. The plank, or other material resting on the carriage, may be set so as to reduce it to any thickness required; and the carriage, moving by a rack and pinion, or rollers, or any lateral motion, to the edge of the knives or cutters on the periphery of the cylinder or wheel, reduces it to any given thickness. After passing the planing and reducing wheel, it then approaches, if required, two revolving cutter-wheels, one for cutting the groove, and the other for cutting the rabbets that form the tongue; one wheel is placed...

To continue reading

Request your trial
48 cases
  • American Refining Co. v. Gasoline Products Co.
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • February 5, 1927
    ...1277, decided February 4, 1926; Burr v. Duryee, Fed. Cas. No. 2,190; Steam Cutter Co. v. Sheldon, Fed. Cas. No. 13,331; Wilson v. Rosseau, 4 How. 646, 11 L. Ed. 1141; Grant v. Raymond, 6 Pet. 218, 8 L. Ed. 376; 30 Cyc. Such examination of the authorities as we have been able to make has led......
  • In re Supernatural Foods, LLC
    • United States
    • United States Bankruptcy Courts. Fifth Circuit. U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Middle District of Louisiana
    • October 17, 2001
    ...at 252, 12 S.Ct. at 642-643 (emphasis added). 124 At this point, the Court notes the Supreme Court's decision in Wilson v. Rousseau, 45 U.S. (4 How.) 646, 11 L.Ed. 1141 (1846) could conceivably conflict with Gormully and Etherington. In Rousseau, it was held that an agreement granting the r......
  • Sidney Henry v. Dick Company
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • March 11, 1912
    ...to continue the use during an extended term of the same patent. This was the express holding in the two prior cases of Wilson v. Rosseau, 4 How. 646, 11 L. ed. 1141, and Bloomer v. McQuewan, 14 How. 539, 14 L. ed. 532, where the unlimited right of use by an unconditional purchaser was laid ......
  • Eben Knowlton v. Frank Moore
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 14, 1900
    ...is present in the statute. Bate Refrigerating Co. v. Sulzberger, 157 U. S. 37, 39 L. ed. 611, 15 Sup. Ct. Rep. 508; Wilson v. Rousseau, 4 How. 646, 680, 11 L. ed. 1141, 1156; Bloomer v. McQuewan, 14 How. 539, 553, 14 L. ed. 532, 538; Blake v. National Banks, 23 Wall. 307, 320, 23 L. ed. 119......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT