Culberson v. State, 55031
| Decision Date | 19 September 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 55031,55031 |
| Citation | 456 So.2d 697 |
| Parties | Alvin CULBERSON v. STATE of Mississippi. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Joseph Leray McNamara, Wise Carter Child & Caraway, Jackson, for appellant.
Edwin Lloyd Pittman, Atty. Gen. by William S. Boyd, III and Charles W. Maris, Jr., Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Jackson, for appellee.
Before WALKER, P.J., and BOWLING and HAWKINS, JJ.
Appellant Alvin Culberson twice has been convicted of capital murder and sentenced to death. On his first appeal [Culberson v. State, 348 So.2d 1025 (Miss.1977) ], his conviction was reversed because he was not given a bifurcated trial as required in capital murder trials under the decision of this Court in Jackson v. State, 337 So.2d 1242 (Miss.1976). On the second appeal, [Culberson v. State, 379 So.2d 499 (Miss.1979)], this Court affirmed Culberson's conviction and sentence of death.
After exhausting all required remedies in this Court, Culberson filed a Petition for Permission to File a Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis with the Circuit Court of Harrison County, in which court appellant was convicted and sentenced. The petition initially filed here was pursuant to the provisions of Mississippi Code Annotated, Section 99-35-145 (1972). The petition proposed to be filed in the Circuit Court of Harrison County alleged a number of reasons it should be granted.
This Court, after careful consideration, found that the petition to file a petition for writ of error coram nobis should be granted. [412 So.2d 1184 (Miss.1982) ].
The opinion and order granting appellant's petition provided that "[a]ccordingly, we grant the petition for a writ of error coram nobis and remand the case for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether Culberson told his attorney he wanted to testify as a witness in his own behalf and whether the attorney disregarded the request and refused to permit Culberson to testify at either the guilt phase or sentencing phase of his trial." The original petition filed before this Court, as stated, set out a large number of grounds by appellant alleging that his trial attorney was ineffective. One of these many grounds was that set out above in this Court's order granting the petition on a limited basis. We found that there was no merit to the other allegations of appellant's petition.
The Circuit Court of the First Judicial District of Harrison County received evidence on the petition for writ of error coram nobis and after conclusion of the trial, rendered its opinion on November 1, 1982, finding as follows:
1. Culberson told his attorney he wanted to testify as a witness in his own behalf.
2. The attorney did not disregard the defendant's request but advised him against it because of the previous convictions of the defendant, and for this reason the defendant did not testify.
3. The attorney did not refuse to permit Culberson to testify at either the guilt phase or the sentencing phase of his trial.
On the appeal, appellant propounds numerous assignments of error alleged to have been committed by the lower court, the first being "Culberson was unconstitutionally denied the right to testify."
We consider only this assignment of error for the following reason: Under this Court's order granting permission to file the Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis, the court at that time fully considered all reasons for requesting the petition and found that only one question could or should be considered by the trial court under the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Howell v. State
...at 1003 (¶ 9) (citing Neal v. State, 687 So.2d 1180, 1182 (Miss.1996) ; Billiot v. State, 655 So.2d 1, 17 (Miss.1995) ; Culberson v. State, 456 So.2d 697, 698 (Miss.1984) ). The trial judge did not err in denying Howell's motion to supplement the record with the newly discovered evidence, w......
-
Howell v. State
...1003 (¶ 9) (citing Neal v. State, 687 So. 2d 1180, 1182 (Miss. 1996); Billiot v. State, 655 So. 2d 1, 17 (Miss. 1995); Culberson v. State, 456 So. 2d 697, 698 (Miss. 1984)). The trial judge did not err in denying Howell's motion to supplement the record with the newly discovered evidence, w......
-
Com. v. Hennessey
...discuss with the defendant his right to testify, has found partial acceptance in Culberson v. State, 412 So.2d 1184 (Miss.1982), 456 So.2d 697 (1984). Other courts have rejected a requirement of an on-the-record colloquy in the absence of an indication by the defendant to the trial judge th......
-
Jaco v. State
...of allocution. See Shelton v. State, 445 So.2d 844, 847 (Miss.1984); Culberson v. State, 412 So.2d 1184, 1186 (Miss.1982), affirmed 456 So.2d 697 (Miss.1984). As the point was not presented in any way, shape, form or fashion at trial, it is not available to the Jaco brothers on their direct......