460 F.2d 1246 (9th Cir. 1972), 71-1921, United States v. Ellsworth

Docket Nº:71-1921.
Citation:460 F.2d 1246
Party Name:UNITED STATES of America and Lyman M. Nicoll, Internal Revenue Agent, Petitioners-Appellants, v. W. Vaughn ELLSWORTH, Respondent-Appellee.
Case Date:May 08, 1972
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 1246

460 F.2d 1246 (9th Cir. 1972)

UNITED STATES of America and Lyman M. Nicoll, Internal Revenue Agent, Petitioners-Appellants,

v.

W. Vaughn ELLSWORTH, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 71-1921.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 8, 1972

Page 1247

Richard K. Burke, U. S. Atty., William C. Smitherman, Richard C. Gormley, Asst. U. S. Atty., Phoenix, Ariz., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Meyer Rothwacks, John P. Burke, John M. Brant, Washington, D. C., for petitioners-appellants.

W. Vaughn Ellsworth, Mesa, Ariz., for respondent-appellee.

Before HAMLEY, CHOY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

This matter is before us on the Government's appeal from a district court order enforcing an Internal Revenue Service summons but attaching conditions thereto, and on cross-appeal by the custodian of the records.

W. Vaughn Ellsworth is allegedly the custodian of certain corporate records of Sonel Research and Development, Inc., an Arizona corporation. In 1970, the Internal Revenue Service sought to subpoena those records for the purpose of determining the correctness of the corporation's 1968 income tax return. Acting under 26 U.S.C. § 7602(2), a summons was issued by the Secretary of the Treasury directing Ellsworth to appear on a certain date, bring with him specified corporate documents, and "give testimony relating to the tax liability" of the corporation.

Ellsworth did not appear and the Internal Revenue Service filed a petition in the district court to judicially enforce the summons under 26 U.S.C. § 7604. A show cause order was issued, a hearing held, and an order issued, the relevant parts of which are quoted in the

Page 1248

margin. 1 The Government appeals from that portion of the order restricting its inquiry concerning matters other than the whereabouts of the records. Ellsworth cross-appeals from that portion of the order compelling him to produce the records and submit to questioning.

Ellsworth's cross-appeal is without merit. A corporation has no Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination and the custodian of corporate records may be compelled to produce the books of the corporation even though they may ultimately be used to incriminate him. Curcio v. United States, 354 U.S. 118, 122, 77 S.Ct. 1145, 1 L.Ed.2d 1225 (1957); Wilson v. United States, 221 U.S. 361, 382, 31 S.Ct. 538, 55 L.Ed. 771 (1911)...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP