In re Modiri, 11–60088.

Decision Date02 July 2012
Docket NumberNo. 11–60088.,11–60088.
Citation474 B.R. 511
PartiesIn re Farzin MODIRI, Debtor.
CourtU.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Michigan

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Yuliy Osipov, Osipov Bigelman, P.C., Southfield, MI, for Debtor.

Stuart A. Gold, Southfield, MI, Trustee.

Opinion Regarding United States Trustee's Motion to Dismiss

STEVEN RHODES, Bankruptcy Judge.

The United States Trustee has filed a motion to dismiss for abuse under 11 U.S.C. § 707(b). The United States Trustee contends that the debtor's expenses of $3,000.00 per month for rent and utility expenses and $1,000.00 per month for transportation expenses are excessive and that when these are adjusted to reasonable amounts, the debtor can repay his creditors a substantial dividend in a chapter 13 case.

The debtor filed an objection to the motion. The Court conducted an evidentiary hearing. For the reason stated herein, the motion is granted.1

The debtor's schedule I shows monthly average net income of $5,731.00. His schedule J shows average monthly expenses of $5,728.00. Other than the expense items to which the United States Trustee objects, the debtor's schedule I is unremarkable. Schedule F shows $81,850.00 in unsecured debt.

At the hearing, the debtor testified that sometime before he filed bankruptcy, he moved to Southern California to obtain a job as an engineer after a two-year layoff, although he still owns a home in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan that is in foreclosure. He states that he was compelled to rent his apartment at $3,000.00 per month because he was unable to find any other rental due to his bankruptcy. He also stated that he decided to rent vehicles on a short term basis from a car rental agency rather than try to buy a vehicle with an interest rate that would be high due to his bankruptcy. He commutes 80 miles per day round-trip and must also pay for tolls and parking. Those expenses, as well as the insurance that he obtains from the rental agency, are all included in his monthly transportation expense of $1,000.00.

Upon examination by the Court, the debtor admitted that his $3,000.00 per month apartment (including utilities) is virtually on the beach facing the Pacific Ocean in Laguna Beach. His living room and balcony face the ocean, the apartment complex's pool, the Pacific Coast Highway and the public beach adjacent to the ocean.2

The Court finds that the debtor's expenses for housing are not reasonably necessary for his support and are excessive. Plainly the debtor has rented an ocean-view apartment at a premium rental rate. The Court simply cannot credit the debtor's testimony that his bankruptcy prevented him from finding a less expensive rental. In this regard, the Court notes that the Central District of California is the highest filing district in the country for bankruptcy; it seems highly unlikely that any of those debtors have been forced to rent ocean-view apartments because of their bankruptcies.

In any event, when the debtor filed his petition, the applicable IRS local housing and utilities standard for Orange County, California, was $1,509.00 for rent or mortgage costs and $490.00 for non-mortgage expenses, for a total of $1,999.00. Accordingly, if the debtor's housing expense comported with the IRS guideline, he would have $1,001.00 in additional net disposable income.

The Court further finds that the debtor's expenses for transportation are not reasonably necessary for his support and are excessive. The debtor has chosen the most expensive means of obtaining transportation-temporarily renting a car and purchasing insurance for it from a car rental agency. The Court has actually never seen this in any prior bankruptcy case; in the Court's experience, other debtors obtain basic transportation for a monthly expense of $300–$500, albeit sometimes at high interest rates. On this point, the Court notes that the applicable IRS transportation expense guideline is $295.00 for operating costs and $496.00 for ownership costs, for a total of $791.00. Accordingly, if the debtor's transportation expense comported with the IRS guideline, he would have an additional $209.00 in net disposable income.

These two considerations suggest a total additional monthly income of $1,210.00, which amounts to $72,600.00 in potential payments in a 60 month chapter 13 plan. The debtor's income is in excess of the state median income, as his means test form admits, so a 60 month plan would be required. Baud v. Carroll, 634 F.3d 327 (6th Cir.2011). Certainly such a plan would pay a significant dividend on the potential unsecured claims of $81,850.00.3

Finally, the debtor asserts that mere ability to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • In re Meehean
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Eastern District of Michigan
    • 27 Enero 2020
    ...disposable income permits liquidation of his consumer debts with relative ease." Krohn , 886 F.2d at 126 ; see also In re Modiri, 474 B.R. 511, 514 (Bankr. E.D. Mich. 2012) ("Clearly, it is an abuse of Chapter 7 for a debtor to seek a discharge of debts that the debtor can pay, since the pu......
  • In re Osorio, Case No.: 13–36671–ABA
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — District of New Jersey
    • 8 Diciembre 2014
    ...the general purpose of a bankruptcy case is to grant relief to those who cannot pay their debts as they become due, see In re Modiri, 474 B.R. 511, 514 (Bankr.E.D.Mich.2012) ; In re Balaja, 190 B.R. 335, 340 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1996) ; Matter of Clifton, 35 B.R. 785, 787 (Bankr.D.N.J.1983), it w......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT