474 F.2d 49 (6th Cir. 1973), 72-1456, Bastian-Blessing, Div. of Golconda Corp. v. N.L.R.B.

Docket Nº:72-1456.
Citation:474 F.2d 49
Party Name:BASTIAN-BLESSING, DIVISION OF GOLCONDA CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
Case Date:February 21, 1973
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

Page 49

474 F.2d 49 (6th Cir. 1973)

BASTIAN-BLESSING, DIVISION OF GOLCONDA CORPORATION, Petitioner,

v.

NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

No. 72-1456.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

February 21, 1973

Page 50

Paul F. Gleeson, Chicago, Ill., Arthur B. Smith, Jr., Van H. Viot, Chicago, Ill., on brief; Vedder, Price, Kaufman & Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner-appellant.

Allison W. Brown, Jr., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Steven C. Kahn, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., Jerome H. Brooks, Director, Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., on brief, for respondent-appellee.

Before EDWARDS and CELEBREZZE, Circuit Judges, and HASTIE, [*] Senior Circuit Judge.

EDWARDS, Circuit Judge.

Bastian-Blessing petitions to set aside and the Board seeks enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding the employer guilty of 8(a)(5) and 8(a)(1) violations of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a)(5) and (1) (1970), by unilaterally terminating an employee health insurance plan which had previously been in force through insurance with Aetna Life Insurance Company.

The employer, purporting to maintain the same benefits, undertook self-insurance. Subsequent to the termination of the Aetna coverage, it informed the union 1 as to what it had done and discussed the reasons for the change, but declined to go back to the Aetna insurance contract when requested to do so.

The Board found that the Aetna termination materially affected mandatory subjects of bargaining in relation to health insurance in that two material changes were made in benefits under the company self-insurance program and in that, in addition, the enforceability, administration and funding of the plan were affected. The Board's order required Bastian-Blessing to restore the status quo by reinstating the contract with Aetna.

The Board Decision and Order of December 16, 1971, is reported at 194 N.L.R.B. 95 (1971), and its Supplemental Decision of March 30, 1972, is reported at 195 N.L.R.B. 167 (1972).

The material facts of this case do not appear to this court to be in dispute. Petitioner does dispute the inferences which the Trial Examiner and the Board drew from those facts, along with the legal conclusions drawn therefrom. Specifically, Bastian-Blessing claims that after termination of the Aetna insurance contract, it engaged in good faith negotiations with the union concerning its health insurance program, which served to satisfy the bargaining obligation under the Act. It also claims that the Board was without authority to order it to reinstate the insurance contract between it and Aetna Life, since it claims that the identity of the insurance carrier is not a mandatory subject for bargaining.

Petitioner, Bastian-Blessing, is a division of a conglomerate, Golconda Corporation, which merged with Astro Controls, Inc., the previous parent corporation of Bastian-Blessing, while this controversy was going on. Local 893 of the Brotherhood of Carpenters has been bargaining agent since 1953 only for 165 employees of the Bastian-Blessing Division. Aetna Life Insurance Company had been the Bastian-Blessing group insurance carrier since World War II. It issued a group insurance policy containing the benefits negotiated between Local 893 and Bastian-Blessing in 1959. This policy was continued in effect, with some changes resulting from collective bargaining, up until August 1, 1970, when the company canceled the contract unilaterally, without prior notice to the union.

The group health insurance plan was a contributory plan. Each employee

Page 51

paid $1.00 per week toward its cost and the employee contributions represented approximately 40% of the premium cost, with the employer paying the rest.

The Trial Examiner found a relationship between increasing benefit costs and the sudden termination of the Aetna contract:

In the fiscal year ending April 20, 1967 (as reported on Form D-2 to the Department of Labor), the total premiums paid Aetna (for over 1,500 employees) amounted to $395,318. Aetna paid out benefits, and put in reserves, a total of $312,696, and refunded over $56,000 to the Company. By fiscal 1969, with somewhat fewer employees, the total premiums had increased almost $100,000, to $493,372, and the total...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP