Kunstsammlungen zu Weimar v. Elicofon, 748-749

Citation478 F.2d 231
Decision Date25 April 1973
Docket NumberNo. 748-749,Dockets 72-2305-2306.,748-749
PartiesKUNSTSAMMLUNGEN zu WEIMAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Edward I. ELICOFON, Defendant-Appellee. FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward I. ELICOFON, Defendant-Appellee, Elisabeth Mathilde Isidore Erbgrossherzogin von Sachsen-Weimar-Eisenach (Grand Duchess of Saxony-Weimar), Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee, Kunstsammlungen zu Weimar, Proposed Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)

Harry I. Rand, New York City (Lawrence M. Kaye, Botein, Hays, Sklar & Herzberg, New York City, on the brief), for proposed plaintiff-intervenor-appellant.

Richard W. Hulbert, New York City (Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee Elicofon.

Albert D. Jordan, New York City (Elliot Paskoff, Horst Kurnik and Valicenti, Leighton, Reid & Pine, New York City, on the brief), for defendant-appellee Federal Republic of Germany.

Herbert Strong, New York City, for plaintiff-intervenor-appellee Duchess of Saxony-Weimar.

Before BREITENSTEIN,* KAUFMAN and MANSFIELD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On January 27, 1969, the Federal Republic of Germany brought suit in the district court for the Eastern District of New York against Edward Elicofon, a New York resident, to recover two valuable paintings by the renowned artist Albrecht Duerer, alleged to have been stolen in 1945 from Schwartzburg Castle in Germany during the American Occupation. The Federal Republic asserts that the paintings, executed in the year 1499, are the property of the German people, having been in the possession of a state museum at the time of theft, and that it is the only government that may properly represent the German people in an American court. On March 25, 1969 the Grand Duchess of Saxony-Weimar was granted leave to intervene, based on a claim that the Duerer masterpieces have been part of the collection of the Grand Duke of Saxony-Weimar since 1824 and that title to the paintings rests in her through an assignment from the Grand-Duke.

On April 14, 1969, the Kunstsammlungen zu Weimar (Weimar Art Collection), an entity existing under the laws of the German Democratic Republic, sought leave to intervene, and brought a separate action against Elicofon for return of the paintings. The Kunstsammlungen asserts that it has custody over the art collection from which the paintings allegedly were stolen and is, accordingly, the rightful owner of the Duerer works.

The motion to intervene was opposed by all parties, and Elicofon moved to dismiss the separate action...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Pfizer, Inc. v. Lord
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • 27 Agosto 1975
    ...126, 136-41, 58 S.Ct. 785, 82 L.Ed. 1224 (1938); Federal Republic of Germany v. Elicofon, 358 F.Supp. 747 (E.D.N.Y.1972), Aff'd. 478 F.2d 231 (2nd Cir. 1973), Cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931, 94 S.Ct. 1443, 39 L.Ed.2d 489 (1974); Accord, Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino, 376 U.S. 398, 408-12,......
  • Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. Elicofon
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • 15 Junio 1981
    ...the German Democratic Republic, a country not recognized by the United States at the time. 358 F.Supp. 747 (E.D.N.Y.1972), aff'd 478 F.2d 231 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931, 94 S.Ct. 1443, 39 L.Ed.2d 489, reh. denied, 416 U.S. 952, 94 S.Ct. 1962, 40 L.Ed.2d 302 (1974). On Septem......
  • First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De Cuba
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 17 Junio 1983
    ...juridical entities whenever the need arises. Cf. Federal Republic of Germany v. Elicofon, 358 F.Supp. 747, 757 (EDNY 1972), aff'd, 478 F.2d 231 (CA2 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931, 94 S.Ct. 1443, 39 L.Ed.2d 489 (1974). See n. 25, supra. We therefore hold that Citibank may set off the val......
  • Kunstsammlungen Zu Weimar v. Elicofon
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • 5 Mayo 1982
    ...and therefore barred from suing in our courts. Federal Republic of Germany v. Elicofon, 358 F.Supp. 747 (E.D.N.Y.1972), aff'd, 478 F.2d 231 (2d Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 931, 94 S.Ct. 1443, 39 L.Ed.2d 489 On September 4, 1974, the United States formally recognized the GDR governmen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT