Charles Wilkes, Plaintiff In Error v. Samuel Dinsman
Decision Date | 01 January 1849 |
Citation | 7 How. 89,48 U.S. 89,12 L.Ed. 618 |
Parties | CHARLES WILKES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. SAMUEL DINSMAN |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial76 cases
-
Connelly v. State of California
...v. Stockes, 3 How. 87, 44 U.S. 87, 11 L.Ed. 506, 833; Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 80 U.S. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646, and Wilkes v. Dinsman, 7 How. 89, 48 U.S. 89, 12 L.Ed. 618.In 2 Harper & James, Torts, section 29.10, subdivisions (2), (3), page 1638, the doctrine of abstention is shown to ge......
-
Butz v. Economou
..."[I]t is not enough to show he committed an error of judgment, but it must have been a malicious and wilful error." Wilkes v. Dinsman, 7 How. 89, 131, 12 L.Ed. 618 (1849). In Spalding v. Vilas, 161 U.S. 483, 16 S.Ct. 631, 40 L.Ed. 780 (1896), on which the Government relies, the principal is......
-
Dalehite v. United States
...v. Biddle, 2 Cir., 177 F.2d 579. 16. Spalding v. Vilas, 161 U.S. 483, 16 S.Ct. 631, 40 L.Ed. 780 (Postmaster General); Wilkes v. Dinsman, 7 How. 89, 12 L.Ed. 618 (officer of Marine Corps); Otis v. Watkins, 9 Cranch 339, 3 L.Ed. 752 (Deputy Collector of Customs); Yaselli v. Goff, 2 Cir., 12 ......
-
U.S. v. Rogers
...and thus it is arguable that this plea of guilty ended the threat of further penalty for the robbery. See Wilkes v. Dinsman, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 89, 123, 12 L.Ed. 618 (1849); United States v. Bayer, 156 F.2d 964, 970 (2d Cir.), rev'd on other grounds, 331 U.S. 532, 67 S.Ct. 1394, 91 L.Ed. 1654......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 provisions
-
10 U.S.C. § 8120 Expiration: Rights of Member
...original section. The words "in foreign waters" are inserted to conform to the interpretation of the Supreme Court in Wilkes v. Dinsman, 7 How. 89 (1849). The words "on service" are omitted, as they have no current ascertainable meaning. The words "by Government or other transportation" are......